|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| The impact of spatial heterogeneity on industrial outputs is a new important topic in economic geography. A considerable amount of research literature has accumulated, but the academic community lacks a systematic and comprehensive review and consensus on this topic. This study carried out research by mining the relevant classical literature. This investigation first combed the connotation of spatial heterogeneity, which is both corresponding to and related to spatial dependence. Theorists generally acknowledge that there is spatial heterogeneity in the process of industrial outputs. Then this study summarizes the logical basis, relationship coordination, measurement and other aspects of the effect of spatial heterogeneity on industrial outputs. In analyzing the impact of spatial heterogeneity on industrial outputs, we should not ignore the spatial dimension, but must also pay attention to the heterogeneity of individual enterprises. Industrial output analysis needs to be based on the relationship between spatial heterogeneity and spatial dependence. The influence of spatial heterogeneity on industrial outputs and the degree of differences among observation objects can be measured by econometric methods. The common indicators for measuring and quantitatively describing the impact of spatial heterogeneity on industrial outputs mainly include semivariogram, the spatial expansion model and the geographical weighted regression model. Finally, some directions of future research are pointed out in order to provide useful ideas for future theoretical research and industrial practice. 2023, Editorial office of Journal of Resources and Ecology. All rights reserved. |
| References |
Aguilar A G. 1999. Mexico City growth and regional dispersal: The expansion of largest cities and new spatial forms. Habitat International, 23(3): 391–412. Allen G L. 1999. Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: Bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. Wayfinding Behavior, (1): 46–80. Alvarado R. 2021. Ecological footprint, economic complexity and natural resources rents in Latin America: Empirical evidence using quantile regressions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318: 128585. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128585. Anselin L. 1989. Spatial econometrics, methods and models. Economic Geography, 65: 160–162. Anselin L. 2019. The Moran scatterplot as an ESDA tool to assess local instability in spatial association: Spatial analytical perspectives on GIS. London, UK: Routledge. Anselin L. 2001a. Spatial econometrics: A companion to theoretical econometrics. Hoboken, USA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Anselin L. 2001b. Spatial effects in econometric practice in environmental and resource economics. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 83(3): 705–710. Anselin L, Varga A, Acs Z J. 2000. Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 79(4):435–443. Axtell R L. 2007. What economic agents do: How cognition and interaction lead to emergence and complexity. The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(2): 105–122. Bai L. 2019. Quantifying the spatial heterogeneity influences of natural and socioeconomic factors and their interactions on air pollution using the geographical detector method: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232: 692–704. Basile R. 2014. Modeling regional economic dynamics: Spatial dependence, spatial heterogeneity and nonlinearities. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 48: 229–245. Berg N, Gigerenzer G. 2010. As-if behavioral economics: Neoclassical economics in disguise? History of Economic Ideas, 18(1): 133–166. Billé A G. 2021. Spatial autoregressive nonlinear models in R with an empirical application in labour economics. Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing. Bocken N M, Short S W, Rana P, et al. 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65: 42–56. Bourdieu P. 1998. Practical reason: On the theory of action. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press. Brenner N. 1999. Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society, 28(1): 39–78. Breschi S, Malerba F. 1997. Sectoral innovation systems: Technological regimes, schumpeterian dynamics, and spatial boundaries. Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations, 1: 130–156. Brunsdon C, Fotheringham A S, Charlton M E. 1996. Geographically weighted regression: A method for exploring spatial nonstationarity. Geographical Analysis, 28(4): 281–298. Brunsdon C, Fotheringham A S, Charlton M. 1998. Geographically weighted regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (Statistician), 47(3): 431–443. Brunsdon C, Fotheringham A S, Charlton M. 1999. Some notes on parametric significance tests for geographically weighted regression. Journal of Regional Science, 39(3): 497–524. Burnett P. 2012. Urban industrial composition and the spatial expansion of cities. Land Economics, 88(4): 764–781. Casetti E. 1972. Generating models by the expansion method: Applications to geographical research. Geographical Analysis, 4(1): 81–91. Ciccone A, Hall R E. 1996. Productivity and the density of economic activity. The American Economic Review, 86(1): 54–70. Colander D. 2000. The death of neoclassical economics. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 22(2): 127–143. Corsín J A. 2003. On space as a capacity. Royal Anthropological Institute, 9(1): 137–153. Dall’Erba S, Percoco M, Piras G. 2008. The European regional growth process revisited. Spatial Economic Analysis, 3(1): 7–25. De Marsily G, Delay F, Gonçalvès J, et al. 2005. Dealing with spatial heterogeneity. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(1): 161–183. Du Q, Deng Y G, Zhou J, et al. 2022. Spatial spillover effect of carbon emission efficiency in the construction industry of China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(2): 2466–2479. Fleming M M. 2000. Spatial statistics and econometrics for models in fisheries economics: Discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82(5): 1207–1209. Fotheringham A S, Charlton M E. 1998. Geographically weighted regression: A natural evolution of the expansion method for spatial data analysis. Environment and Planning A, 30(11): 1905–1927. Fujita M, Krugman P. 2004. The new economic geography: Past, present and the future. Papers in Regional Science, 83(1): 139–164. Fusco E, Vidoli F, Sahoo B K. 2018. Spatial heterogeneity in composite indicator: A methodological proposal. Omega, 77: 1–14. Goodchild M F. 2004a. The validity and usefulness of laws in geographic information science and geography. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(2): 300–303. Goodchild M F. 2004b. Geoscience, geography, form, and pro-cess. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4): 709–714. Haining R P. 2003. Spatial data analysis: Theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Hausmann R, Hidalgo C A, Bustos S, et al. 2014. The atlas of economic complexity: Mapping paths to prosperity. Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press. Herliana S. 2015. Regional innovation cluster for small and medium enterprises (SME): A triple Helix concept. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169: 151–160. Hess M. 2004. ‘Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2): 165–186. Huang Y F, Leung Y. 2002. Analysing regional industrialisation in Jiangsu Province using geographically weighted regression. Journal of Geographical Systems, 4(2): 233–249. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |