EFL writing teachers practices and values of assessment for and as learning in a constrained context

Singh, Amreet Kaur Jageer

Abstract

Assessment for Learning (AfL) and Assessment as Learning (AaL) are gaining increasing prominence especially in university EFL writing lessons. This study sheds light on the practices and values of Indonesian EFL writing teachers towards AfL and AaL strategies during the constrained context of online learning setting because of the COVID-19 pandemic. By using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis, explanatory sequential mixed method was used in conjunction with a case study research design. Quantitative data were obtained from 54 teachers who responded to the AfL and AaL Strategy Questionnaire (AfL-AaLSQ), indicating their practices and values of AfL-AaL strategies. Meanwhile, the qualitative data were the results of interview sessions with seven selected participants, who described their practices and values in details. The findings show that all respondents accorded high importance to all AfL-AaL strategies and rated themselves as frequently implementing the AfL-AaL strategies. In both practice and values, the highest mean value was obtained for providing assessment criteria, and the lowest for the peer-and self-assessment. Interestingly, the charting of the mean scores shows a persistent gap between lower-rated practices and the higher-rated values. Finally, several reasons, including the effect of the constrained context, and ramifications of this discovery are examined in depth. 2023, The Pacific Association for Computer Assisted Language Learning (PacCALL). All rights reserved.

References

Alderson, J. C., Brunfaut, T., & Harding, L. (2017). Bridging assessment and learning: A view from second and foreign language assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2017.1331201

Alharbi, M. A. (2022). Exploring the impact of teacher feedback modes and features on students’ text revisions in writing. Assessing Writing, 52, 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2022.100610

Almossa, S. Y., & Alzahrani, S. M. (2022). Assessment practices in Saudi higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-01025-z

Al-Seghayer, K. (2014). The four most common constraints affecting English teaching in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of English Linguistics, 4(5), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v4n5p17

Anam, S. & Putri, N. V. W. (2021). How literate am I about assessment: Evidence from Indonesian EFL pre-service and in-service teachers. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(2), 377-388. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i2.4374

Arsyad Arrafii, M. (2021). Assessment reform in Indonesia: Contextual barriers and opportunities for implementation. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 43(1), 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1898931

Ashraf, H., & Zolfaghari, S. (2018). EFL teachers' assessment literacy and their reflective teaching. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 425-436. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11129a

Baird, J.-A., Andrich, D., Hopfenbeck, T. N., & Stobart, G. (2017). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 24(3), 317–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1319337

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Cheng, X., Zhang, L. J., & Yan, Q. (2021). Exploring teacher written feedback in EFL writing classrooms: Beliefs and practices in interaction. Language Teaching Research, 1-31 136216882110576. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211057665

Chong, S. W. (2018). Three paradigms of classroom assessment: Implications for written feedback research. Language Assessment Quarterly, 15(4), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2017.1405423

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed). Pearson. http://nuir.nkumbauniversity.ac.ug/handle/20.500.12383/985

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 780.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, 453.

Dann, R. (2014). Assessment as learning: Blurring the boundaries of assessment and learning for theory, policy and practice. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(2), 149–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.898128

Earl, L. M. (2013). Assessment for learning; assessment as learning: Changing practices means changing beliefs. Assessment, 80, 63–71. https://wlts.edb.hkedcity.net/filemanager/file/EBook_Assessment_and_Learning_Issue_2_2013.pdf

Ewing, L. A. (2021). Rethinking higher education post COVID-19. The Future of Service Post-COVID-19 Pandemic, Volume 1: Rapid Adoption of Digital Service Technology, 37-54. https://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/46838/2021_Book_TheFutureOfServicePost-COVID-1.pdf?sequence=1#page=48

Fitriyah, I., Basthomi, Y., Khotimah, K., & Gozali, I. (2022). Implementation of assessment for learning in online EFL writing class: A case of novice undergraduate teachers. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 129-159. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/LEARN/index

Fitriyah, I., & Jannah, M. (2021). Online assessment effect in EFL classroom: An investigation on students and teachers’ perceptions. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 5(2), 265-284. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v5i2.709

Fitriyah, I., Masitoh, F., & Widiati, U. (2022). Classroom-based language assessment literacy and professional development need between novice and experienced EFL teachers. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v12i1.46539

Ghaffar, M. A., Khairallah, M., & Salloum, S. (2020). Co-constructed rubrics and assessment for learning: The impact on middle school students’ attitudes and writing skills. Assessing Writing, 45, 100468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100468

Ghanbari, N., & Nowroozi, S. (2021). The practice of online assessment in an EFL context amidst COVID-19 pandemic: Views from teachers. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00143-4

Greenberg, K. P. (2015). Rubric use in formative assessment: A detailed behavioral rubric helps students improve their scientific writing skills. Teaching of Psychology, 42(3), 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315587618

Hentasmaka, D., & Cahyono, B. Y. (2021). Peer feedback uptakes and outcomes across EFL students' proficiency levels: A study at tertiary education in Indonesia. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 271-286. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14316a

Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2021). Understanding changes in EFL teachers’ feedback practice during COVID-19: Implications for teacher feedback literacy at a time of crisis. The Asia- Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 509-518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00583-9