UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : |
This study is aimed at determining young students’ achievement in the standard 5 science content, and attitudes towards science, after experiencing hands-on learning. Ten pupils from one elementary school in Selangor were purposively selected as participants. Observations and interviews were the methods used to collect data, and rubrics were specially designed as assessment tools. Data collected from observation were analysed descriptively while from interviews using NVivo 2.0. It is found that the attitudes of th pupils are positive towards science after experiencing hands-on learning, and they are able to link concepts taught through experiments to their daily life experience. Also, hands-on/authentic teaching and learning is found to be an effective pedagogy which increases pupils’ achievement as well as improves their understanding of science concepts. The young students are found to be highly motivated, hence hands-on/authentic teaching and learning is recommended to be implemented by elementary school teachers in Malaysia. |
References |
1. Ali, M. M., Yager, R. E., Hacieminoglu, E., & Caliskan, I. (2013). Changes in student attitudes regarding science when taught by teachers without experiences with a model professional development program. School Science and Mathematics, 113(3), 109-119. 2. Anderson, R. D. (2002). Reforming science teaching: what research says about inquiry. Journal of Science Teacher Education. 13, 1-12. 3. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M. & Simon, H. A. (1996). Situated learning and education. Educational Researcher, 25(4), 5-11. 4. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B. & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: examining 10/11-year-old school children’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617-639. 5. Arisoy, N. (2007). Examining 8th grade students’ perception of learning environment of science classrooms in relations to motivational beliefs and attitudes. Unpublished Theses in Middle east Technical University, Ankara, Turkey. 6. Atkin, J.M. & Black, P. (2003). Inside science education reform: a history of curricular and policy change. New York: Teachers College Press. 7. Azizoglu, n. & Cetin, G. (2009). The effect of learning style on middle school students’ motivation and attitudes towards science, and the relationships among these variables. Kastamonu Education Journal, 17(1), 171-182. 8. Brown, J. S., Collins, A. & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18, 32-42. 9. Bulunuz, N. & Jarrett, O. S. (2010). The effects of hands-on learning stations on building American elementary teachers’ understanding about earth and space science concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 6(2), 85-99. 10. Campione, J. C. & Brown, A. I. (1990). Guided learning and transfer: implications for approaches to assessment, in Frederiksen, N., Glaser, R., Lesgold, A. &Shafto, M. G. (Eds) Diagnostic Monitoring of Skill and Knowledge Acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 11. Chen, C. H. & Howard, B. (2010). Effect of live simulation on middle school students’ attitudes and learning toward science. Educational Technology & Society, 13(1), 133-139. 12. Cumming, J. J. & Maxwell, G. S. (1999). Contextualising authentic assessment. Assessment in Education, 6(2), 177-194. 13. Gerde, H., Schachter, R. & Wasik, B. (2013). Using the scientific method to guide learning: an integrated approach to early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Education Journal, 41(5), 315-323. 14. Hacieminoglu, E. (2016). Elementary school students’ attitude toward science and related variables. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(2), 35-52. 15. Haitham, M. A. (2002). Attitudes of undergraduate majors in elementary education toward mathematics through a hands-on manipulative approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94(1), 55-58. 16. Haigh, M., France, B. & Forret, M. (2005). Is ‘doing science’ in New Zealand classrooms an expression of scientific inquiry? International Journal of Science Education. 27(2), 215-226. 17. Hume, A. (2009). Authentic scientific inquiry and school science. Teaching Science: The Journal of the Australian Science Teachers Association, 55(2). 35-41. 18. Hume, A. & Coll, R. (2010). Authentic student inquiry: the mismatch between the intended curriculum and the student-experienced curriculum. Research in Science & Technological Education. 28(1), 43-62. 19. Johnson, C. C., Zhang, D. & Kahle, J. B. (2012). Effective science instruction: impact on high-stakes assessment performance. Resarch in Middle Level Education Online. 35(9). 1-12. 20. Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Tyler-Wood, T. & Periathiruvadi, S. (2013). Impact on environmental power monitoring activities on middle school perceptions of STEM. Science Education International. 24(1), 98-123. 21. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 22. Maxwell, G. S. (1997). Teacher judgement of achievement standards in performance assessments, in Adar,D. & Kandarakis, H. M. (Eds) Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, Montreal, Canada, 12-17 June 1995. Montreal, IAEA, Faculty of Science Education, University of Montreal. 23. Moebius-Clune, B. N., Elsevier, I. K., Crawford, B. A., Trautmann, N. M., Schindelbeck, R. R. & van Es, H. M. (2011). Moving authentic soil research into high school classrooms: student engagement and learning. Journal of Natural Resources & Life Sciences Education, 40(1), 102-113. 24. Murphy, S. H. (2009). Real authentic learning. Principal Leadership: Middle level Edition, 9(6), 6-8. 25. National Research Council (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. 26. Newhouse, N. (1990). Implication of attitudes and behavior research for environmental conservation. The Journal of Environmental education, 22(1), 26-32. 27. Newmann, F. M. & Archbald, D. A. (1992). The nature of authentic academic achievement, in Berlak, H., Newmann, F. M., Adams, E., Archbald, D. A., Burgess, T., Raven, J. & Romberg, T. A., Toward a new science of educational testing and assessment. Albany, NY, State University of New York Press. 28. Osborne, J. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079. 29. Resnick, L. B. (1987). Learning in school and out. Educational Researcher, 16, 13-20. 30. Resnick, L. B. (1989). Introduction, in Resnick, L. B. (Ed.) Knowing, learning and instruction: essays in honor of Robert Glazer. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 31. Riah, H. & Fraser, B. J. (1997). Chemistry learning environment in Brunei Darussalam’s secondary schools. In D. I., Fisher & T. Rickards (Eds.), Science, Mathematics and Technology Education and National development: Proceedings of the Vietnam Conference (pp.108-120). Hanoi; Vietnam. 32. Rukavina, S., Zuvic-Butorac, M., Ledic, J., Milotic, B. & Jurdana-Sepic, R. (2012). Developing positive attitude towards science and mathematics through motivational classroom experiences. Science Education International, 23(1), 6-19. 33. Sandoval, W. A. (2005). Understanding students’ practical epistemologies and their influence on learning through inquiry. Science Education, 89(4), 634-656. 34. Schroeder, C. M., Scott, T. P., Tolson, H., Huang, T. Y. & lee, Y. H. (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: effects of teaching strategies on students achievement in science in USA. Jounal of research in Science Teaching, 44, 1436-1460. 35. Shedletzky, E. & Zion, M. (2005). The essence of open inquiry teaching. Science Education International, 16(1), 23-38. 36. Splitter, L. J. (2009). Authenticity and construction in education. Stud Philos Educ 28, 135-151 DOI 10.1007/s11217-008-9105-3. 37. Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V. & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312(5779), 1143-1144, doi: 10.1126/science.1128690. 38. Telli, S., Cakiroglu, J., & den Brok, P. (2006). Turkish secondary education students’ perceptions of their classroom learning environment and their attitude towards Biology. In D.L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: world views (pp. 517-542). 39. Tytler, R. (2007). Re-imagining science education: engaging students in science for Australia’s future (2007). Australian Education Review. http://research.acer.edu. au/aer/3. 40. Varelas, M., Plotnick, R., Wink, D., Fan, Q. & Harris, Y. (2008). Inquiry and connections in integrated science content courses for elementary education majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 37(5), 40-45. 41. Verma, A. K., Dickerson, D. & McKinney, S. (2011). Engaging students in STEM careers with project-based learning – marine tech project. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 71(1), 25-31. 42. Wahyudi, W. & David, F. T. (2004). The status of science classroom learning environments in Indonesian lower secondary schools. Learning Environment Research, 7, 43-63. 43. Watson, R., Goldsworthy, A. & Wood-Robinson, V. (1999). What is not fair with investigations? School Science Review. 80(292), 101-106. 44. Wiggins, G. P. (1993) Assessning student performance. San Francisco, CA, Jossey- Bass. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |