|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Digital platforms are one of the technology adoption that is beginning to be used in most vocational colleges today. Services provided through digital platforms are an alternative to conventional methods. However, the use of digital platforms nowadays, among users consisting of vocational college students in Malaysia is still at a less than satisfactory level. Previous studies also focused a lot on the use and acceptance of technology platforms among users in schools only but not in vocational colleges (VC). The aim of the research is to determine the experts consensus on the objective of the digital pedagogy policy for Technical Education and Vocational Training (TVET) students especially in vocational colleges which is currently under development. Vocational colleges is one of the Technical Education and Vocational Training (TVET) institutions in Malaysia that offers certificate level and skill diploma education to high school students. Therefore, it is important to identify the policy that will be used. The Fuzzy Delphi Technique (FDT) was used in this research. Ten experts were chosen by utilizing the purposive sampling method. Analysis of the data was using the Triangular Fuzzy Number and Defuzzification process. The findings showed 100% consensus was achieved by the experts for objectives 1 and 3, and 90% consensus was achieved by the experts for objective 2. All of the experts agreed on the elements in the objectives of the digital pedagogy policy for TVET students. Further development of this policy hopefully will help the teachers in improving their knowledge of digital pedagogy and increase their competency pedagogy in order to produce skills oriented workforce among TVET students in Malaysia. Therefore, the results of this study are expected to be used to strengthen the development of e-learning models in the future to help students and educators to use digital platforms in vocational colleges in particular. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia Publishers Office. |
| References |
Berliner, D. C. (2004). Describing the Behavior and Documenting the Accomplishments of Expert Teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 200–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467604265535 Chen, C. T. (2000). Extensions of the TOPSIS for Group Decision-Making under Fuzzy Environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114, 1-9. Cheng, C. H., & Lin, Y. (2002). Evaluating the Best Main Battle Tank Using Fuzzy Decision Theory with Linguistic Criteria Evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142, 74-86. Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-Based Approach to Developing Expert Systems with the Cooperation of Multiple Experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 26-40. Ciptono, A., Setiyono, S., Nurhidayati, F., & Vikaliana, R. (2019). Fuzzy Delphi method in education: A mapping. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1360, Article 12029. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1360/1/012029 Cruickshank, D. R., Jenkins, D. B., & Metcalf, K. K. (1995). The act of teaching. New York: McGraw-Hill Dangwal, K. L. & Srivastava, S. (2016). Digital Pedagogy in Teacher Education. International Journal of Information Science and Computing, 3(2): December 2016: p. 67-72. DOI: 10.5958/2454-9533.2016.00008.9 Deng, L., & Yu, D. (2014). Deep learning: methods and applications. Foundations and Trends® in Signal Processing, 7(3–4), 197-387 Derek Cheung. (2001). School-based assessment in public examinations: Identifying the concerns of teachers. Educational Journal, 29(2). The Chinese University of Hong Kong Díaz-Noguera, M.D., Hervás-Gómez, C., De laCalle-Cabrera, A.M., López-Meneses, E. (2022). Autonomy, Motivation, and Digital Pedagogy Are Key Factors in the Perceptions of Spanish Higher-Education Students Toward Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 654.https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19020654 Embi, M. A. (2010). Panduan Amalan Pengajaran & Pembelajaran Berkesan. [A Guide to Effective Teaching & Learning Practices]. Pusat Pembangunan Akademik: Bangi Frank, J. R., Snell, L. S., Cate, O. T., Holmboe, E. S., Carraccio, C., Swing, S. R., & Harris, K. A. (2010). Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 32(8), 638-645 Gambatese, J.A., Behm, M., & Rajendran, S. (2008) Design’s Role in Construction Accident Causality and Prevention: Perspectives from an Expert Panel, Safety Science, 46 (4), pp. 675-691. Gerds, P. (2008). Shaping and evaluating vocational training offers. Handbook of TVET Research, 1 Gibson, P. A., Stringer, K., Cotten, S. R., Simoni, Z., O'neal, L. J., & Howell-Moroney, M. (2014). Changing teachers, changing students? The impact of a teacher-focused intervention on students' computer usage, attitudes, and anxiety. Computers & Education, 71, 165-174 Göçen, A., Eral, S. H., & Buçuk, M. H. (2020). Teacher perceptions of a 21st-century classroom. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 7(1), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.638110 Hasim, M. A., Jabar, J., Sufian, A., Ibrahim, N. F., & Abdul Khalid, F. (2023). Employing fuzzy Delphi techniques to validate the components and contents of e-learning antecedents and usage behaviour towards e-learning performance. European Journal of Educational Research, 12(1), 467-480. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.12.1.467 Hosseini, H., Maxwell, H., & Mehrnaz Mostafapour (2019). Learning is child’s play: game-based learning in computer science education. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 19(3), 1-18 Ilomäki, L. (2008). The effects of ICT on school: teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Disertasi PhD. University of Turku, Finland Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 137-154 Ismail, M. Z. & Othman, M. K. (2021). Amalan Pedagogi Abad Ke-21 Dalam Kalangan Guru Pelatih Program Ijazah Sarjana Muda Perguruan (Pismp) Pendidikan Islam di Institut Pendidikan Guru Malaysia. [21st Century Pedagogical Practices Among Teacher Trainees of the Bachelor of Teaching Degree Program (PISMP) in Islamic Education at the Malaysian Institute of Teacher Education] Jurnal Penyelidikan Dedikasi, [S.l.], v. 13, p. 54-71, Feb. 2021. ISSN 2710-6810. Available at: https://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jd/article/view/12184 Johari, F. M., Othman, W., Ismail, H. N., & Isa, Z. (2014). Isu dan Cabaran Pelaksanaan Pendidikan Asas Vokasional (PAV) di Sekolah Menengah Harian, Malaysia. [Issues and Challenges in the Implementation of Basic Vocational Education (PAV) in Secondary Schools, Malaysia]. In PDE Professional Development in Education Conference 2014, 11-12 Juni 2014, Park Hotel Bandung Jones, H., & Twiss, B. L. (1978). Forecasting Technology for Planning Decisions. New York: Macmillan Kent, P., & Holdway, M. (2009). Interactive whiteboards, productive pedagogies and literacy teaching. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 17(1), 21-25 Kim, C., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76-85 Kimmons, R., Miller, B. G., Amador, J., Desjardins, C. D., & Hall, C. (2015). Technology integration coursework and finding meaning in pre-service teachers’ reflective practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(6), 809-829 Kurnia, D, Dittrich, J & Ilhamdaniah (2013). Occupational competence needs analysis as basis for TVET teacher curriculum development, RCP practice and working paper, no. 3, Regional Cooperation Platform for Vocational Teacher Education in Asia, Shanghai, viewed 22 Apr 2022, http://tvet-online.asia/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/PWP_vol-3_Kurnia_etal.pdf Kurvinen, E., Dagienė, V., & Laakso, M.-J. (2018). The impact and effectiveness of technology-enhanced mathematics learning (pp. 344–356). Lithuania: Proceedings of Constructionism Kurvinen, E., Kaila, E., Laakso, M.-J., & Salakoski, T. (2020). Long-term effects on technology enhanced learning: The use of weekly digital lessons in mathematics. Informatics in Education, 19(1), 51–75. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2020.04 |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |