UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This study was carried out to uncover the pedagogical gaps by characterizing the teaching practices of chemistry within a teacher education institution and subsequently, identifying the prevalent, non-prevalent and unobserved teaching practices. Accordingly, this implementation study employed the classroom observation method. The one-semester implementation of 11 chemistry lessons of a university lecturer was observed using a psychometrically-validated observation checklist comprises 50 items or indicators that measure six principles (dimensions). The use of the observation checklist entails checking whether each indicator is observed or otherwise during classroom observations. With a frequency of more than 25% to be considered prevalent, the findings indicate that the lecturer prevalently maintained a scaffolding of instructional alignment (62.5%), offered quality learning environments, resources, and technology (57.1%), and promoted positive beliefs, attitudes, and behavioral patterns (54.5%). However, it was a non-prevalent practice in encouraging intellectual curiosity (8.3%), and promoting an atmosphere of critical thinking and inquiry (14.3%). The practice of offering a varied learning atmosphere was, regrettably, non-existent (0%). The pedagogical gaps uncovered are discussed in terms of the needed customized staff development on teaching and learning in teacher education, particularly the content coverage of pedagogy (or teaching models), and the pedagogical coverage of pedagogy. 2023, Institute of Advanced Engineering and Science. All rights reserved. |
References |
Ministry of Education Malaysia, Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025 (Preschool to Post-secondary Education). Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia, 2012. I. V. S. Mullis, M. O. Martin, P. Goy, D. L. Kelly, and B. Fishbein, TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College, 2020. M. O. Martin, I. V. S. Mullis, P. Foy, and G. M. Stanco, The TIMSS 2011 International Results in Science. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Boston College, 2012. T. S. A. Azian, “STEM Education: Policies and prospects towards achieving the International standard and meeting national development needs,” The keynote address was given at International Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics High-Level Policy Forum on Evidenced-Based Science Education in Developing Countries, Kuala Lumpur, 2015. C. Green, M. Eady, and P. Andersen, “Preparing quality teachers,” Teaching & Learning Inquiry, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 104–125, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.20343/teachlearninqu.6.1.10. G. K. Paronjodi, A. J. Jusoh, and M. H. Abdullah, “A comparative study of beginning teacher induction in Malaysia and Victoria (Australia): A review of the literature,” Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 36–48, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.37134/jrpptte.vol7.no1.5.2017. P. S. C. Goh and K.-T. Wong, “Discerning beginning teachers’ conceptions of competence through a phenomenographic investigation,” Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, vol. 4, pp. 40–47, 2014. C. K. S. Singh, R. Gopal, N. A. Mostafa, R. K. A. Singh, E. T. Ong, and T. S. M. Singh, “ESL teachers’ strategies to foster higher-order thinking skills to teach writing,” Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, vol. 17, no. Number 2, pp. 195–226, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.32890/mjli2020.17.2.7. C. K. Swaran Singh, E. T. Ong, T. S. Masa Singh, M. Maniam, and T. M. Tunku Mohtar, “Exploring ESL learners’ reading test taking strategies,” Studies in English Language and Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 227–242, 2021, doi: 10.24815/siele.v8i1.18130. K. Roberts-Hull, B. Jensen, and S. Cooper, A new approach: Teacher education reform. Melbourne, Australia: Learning First, 2015. H. T. L. Ha, A. T. K. Pham, H. T. Nguyen, and H. T. T. Duong, “Training Pedagogical Skills: Evaluation of Lecturers and Teacher Training Students at Educational Universities in Vietnam,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 17, no. 12, p. em2054, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/11418. K. E. Leong, C. M. Chew, and S. S. Abdul Rahim, “Understanding Malaysian pre-service teachers mathematical content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge,” EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 11, no. 2, Apr. 2015, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1346a. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group, Action Now: Classroom Ready Teachers. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group Final Report, 2015. E. Thanheiser et al., “Prospective Elementary Mathematics Teacher Content Knowledge: What Do We Know, What Do We Not Know, and Where Do We Go?” The Mathematics Enthusiast, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 433–448, 2014, doi: 10.54870/1551-3440.1308. P. Griffin, E. Care, M. Francis, D. Hutchinson, A. Arratia-Martinez, and C. McCabe, Assessment and Learning Partnerships: The influences of teaching practices on student achievement. Melbourne: Assessment Research Centre, 2013. F. Senom, A. R. Zakaria, and S. S. Ahmad Shah, “Novice Teachers’ Challenges and Survival: Where do Malaysian ESL Teachers Stand?” American Journal of Educational Research, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 119–125, 2013, doi: 10.12691/education-1-4-2. S. Halim, R. Wahid, and T. Halim, “Classroom observation- a powerful tool for continuous professional development (CPD),” International Journal on Language, Research and Education Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 162–168, May 2018, doi: 10.30575/2017/IJLRES-2018050801. M. Hammersley and P. Atkinson, Ethnography Principles in Practice, 4th ed. London: Routledge, 2019. T. L. Hutner and V. Sampson, “New ways of teaching and observing science class,” Phi Delta Kappan, vol. 96, no. 8, pp. 52–56, May 2015, doi: 10.1177/0031721715583964. J. Ryder, “Practice Teaching: A Reflective Approach,” ELT Journal, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 361–363, 2013, doi: 10.1093/elt/cct027. J. N. Mikeska, S. Holtzman, D. F. McCaffrey, S. Liu, and T. Shattuck, “Using classroom observations to evaluate science teaching: Implications of lesson sampling for measuring science teaching effectiveness across lesson types,” Science Education, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 123–144, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1002/sce.21482. M. O’Leary, Classroom Observation: A Guide to the Effective Observation of Teaching and Learning, 2nd Edition. UK: Routledge, 2020. E. C. Wragg, An Introduction to Classroom Observation, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2012. M. Antinluoma, L. Ilomäki, and A. Toom, “Practices of Professional Learning Communities,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 6, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.617613. G. D. Borich, Observation skills for effective teaching: Research-based practice, 7th ed. Abingdon, OX: Taylor & Francis, 2016. W. Lan and R. Lam, “Exploring an EFL teacher’s beliefs and practices in teaching topical debates in mainland China,” Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 25–44, 2020. K. Jonson, Being an Effective Mentor: How to Help Beginning Teachers Succeed. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press, 2014. P. J. E. Alegado and H. Y. Soe, “the Significance of Mentoring on Teachers’ Beliefs and Teachers’ Pedagogical Practices: A Comparative Analysis Among 47 Countries Based on 2018 Teaching and Learning International Survey (Talis),” Bulgarian Journal of Science and Education Policy, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 232–259, 2020. M. Asgari, A. M. Miles, M. S. Lisboa, and M. A. Sarvary, “COPUS, PORTAAL, or DART? Classroom Observation Tool Comparison from the Instructor User’s Perspective,” Frontiers in Education, vol. 6, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.740344. G. E. Mills and L. R. Gay, Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications, Loose-Leaf Version, 11th Ed. London: Pearson, 2014. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |