UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
![]() |
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Cooperative learning is a student-centered learning technique that can be considered a learning strategy for improving student performance both intellectually and in soft skill acquisition. Changes in curriculum structure in vocational institutions, because of the TVET transformation in 2012, have had an unforeseen influence on teaching and learning, whereas in the prior framework, a detailed teaching guideline was supplied compared to the latest structure. Teachers with inadequate knowledge and experience in learning strategies struggled to execute the new curriculum structure due to the lack of depth in these recent curriculum structure. This may be seen in the case of construction drawing subjects, where there were originally 14 main topics but now there are just four. Thus, the goal of this research is to help these teachers by offering a guideline for creating lesson plans that use a cooperative learning strategy. The aim of this paper is to identify and highlight the important component in the creation of a lesson plan using cooperative learning. For this investigation, the fuzzy Delphi technique was used. The main instrument for this study is a questionnaire survey that was developed utilizing a construct identified through literature and the results of a previous needs analysis. A total of 15 expert panels were chosen as the sample, which included university lecturers, vocational college instructors, officers from the Ministry of Education's Technical and Vocational Training Division, and industry representatives. The data was analyzed with the help of Microsoft Excel FDM. Visual skills, Cooperative Student Team Achievement Division (STAD), Power Point, and demonstrations components have been recognized as the major component to include in the lesson plan based on the analysis. With these components identified, a good lesson plan guideline for the next phase of this study can be constructed. It is envisaged that the development of such guidelines would help to elevate the practice of teaching and learning to the next level. 2023 UTHM Publisher. All rights reserved. |
References |
Adepeju, A. I. G. H. T. Y. S. (2018). Effect of powerpoint presentation on students’ cognitive achievement in geography. Romanian Review of Geographical Education, 3(VII/1), 46–60. doi.org/10.23741/rrge120184 Abdul Latif, A., Mohd Yusof, M. H., Arsat, M., & Amin, N. F. (2020). Issue and challenge for vocational teaching quality in the vocational college lecturers: A systematic review. Sains Humanika, 2, 9–13. Ahmad,A. M., Hussin, Z., Malik, M, A., Yusof, F., Jamil, M. R. M. (2017). Masalah etika dan akhlak pelajar kemahiran kejuruteraan: Analisis keperluan. JUKU, 34–45. Alada, H. (2018). Challenges of “teaching and learning” in technical drawing course: A comparison of architectural and engineering drawing. Journal of Teaching and Education, 8, 2. 1–12. Asra, Mohd Ridhuan, M. J., Tony Lim, A., Saedah, S., & Siti Aisyah, H. (2014). Implementation model of mlearning based discovery learning. International Conference on Global Trends in Academic Research., 2009, 366–382. Backfisch,I., Lachner, A., Hische, C., Loose, F., & Scheiter, K. (2020). Professional knowledge or motivation? Investigating the role of teachers’ expertise on the quality of technology-enhanced lesson plans. Learning and Instruction, 66(March 2019), 101300. doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101300 Bairaktarova, D. (2017). Coordinating mind and hand: The importance of manual drawing and descriptive geometry instruction in a cad-oriented engineering design graphics class. Engineering Design Graphics Journal, 81(3), 1–16 Budiman & Anne Nurfarina. (2019). Demonstration Method Drawing Tutorial for Autism Student. 7, 1–7. doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071401 Chuang, Y. H., Lai, F. C., Chang, C. C., & Wan, H. T. (2018). Effects of a skill demonstration video delivered by smartphone on facilitating nursing students’ skill competencies and self-confidence: A randomized controlled trial study. Nurse Education Today, 66(July 2017), 63–68. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.03.027 Contreras, K., Arredondo, C., Díaz, C., Inostroza, M. J., & Strickland, B. (2020). Examining differences between pre- and in-service teachers’ cognition when lesson planning. System, 91, 102240. doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102240 Casey, A., & Fernandez-rio, J. (2019). Cooperative learning and the affective domain. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 3084. doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2019.1559671 Gustia, D. E., Mawardi, M., & Astuti, S. (2019). Implementation of STAD learning models to improve 5th students’ critical thinking skills and mathematics learning outcomes. Jurnal Daya Matematis. doi.org/10.26858/jds.v7i1.8850 Hassan, M. N., Mustapha, R., Nik Yusuff, N. A., & Mansor, R. (2017). Pembangunan modul kemahiran berfikir aras tinggi di dalam mata pelajaran sains sekolah rendah: analisis keperluan guru. Sains Humanika, 9(1–5), 119–125. doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-5.1185 Ismail, K., Mohd Nopiah, Z., & Mohd Sattar, R. (2018). Challenges faced by vocational teachers in public skills training institutions: A reality in Malaysia. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 10(2), 13–27. doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2018.10.02.002 Janssen, N., Knoef, M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2019). Technological and pedagogical support for pre-service teachers’ lesson planning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), 115–128. doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1569554 Jamaludin, M., & Mokhtar, M. F. (2018). Students Team Achievement Division. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(2). doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i2/3966 Johnson, P. Z., Kasprzak, W. K., Shapiro, B. A., & Simon, A. E. (2019). RNA2Drawer: geometrically strict drawing of nucleic acid structures with graphical structure editing and highlighting of complementary subsequence. RNA Biology, 16(12), 1667–1671. doi.org/10.1080/15476286.2019.1659081 König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., Fladung, I., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Pre–service teachers’ generic and subject-specific lesson-planning skills: On learning adaptive teaching during initial teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 131–150. doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1679115 Laa, N., Winata, H., & Meilani, R. I. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe student teams’ achievement division terhadap minat belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Manajemen Perkantoran, 2(2), 139–148. McLain, M. (2021). Developing perspectives on ‘the demonstration’ as a signature pedagogy in design and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(1), 3–26. doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09545-1 Mohd Arshad, Z., & Mustapha, R. (2017). Hubungan antara beban tugas dengan efikasi diri dan kepuasan kerja pensyarah di kolej vokasional. Sains Humanika, 9(1–5). doi.org/10.11113/sh. v9n1-5.1174 Mohd Ridhuan & Nurul Rabihah (2020). Kepelbagaian Metodologi dalam Penyelidikan Reka Bentuk dan Pembangunan. Qaisar Prestige Resources. Mujiarto, Djohar, A., & Komaro, M. (2018). A design of innovative engineering drawing teaching materials. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306(1). doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012090 Murray T.J., Pipino L. L. and Van Gigch J.P. (1985). A pilot study of fuzzy set modification of Delphi, Human Systems Management, 5(1), 76-80. Noviyanta, R., & Ngadiyono, Y. (2019). The development of “manufacturing drawing” video tutorials in state vocational high school SMKN 2 pengasih. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1273(1). doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012022 Nsanja, Y. (2019). Drawing for design: exploring how best students in year one learn freehand drawing using geometric shapes and lines. Islamis University Multidisciplinry Journal, 6(2), 162–168. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |