|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Over the past few years, diverse forms of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics) intervention have been designed, demonstrating their beneficial implications on students cognitive and affective domains. This study aims to systematically review the development of STEM education intervention on secondary education through the application of the innovative CiteSpace software and an in-depth systematic analysis. This complementary review provides an overview of visualised citations and empirical studies in chronological order as well as an in-depth analysis of STEM education intervention, which has not been conducted in previous research. The largest seven clusters and top 10 references with strongest citation bursts over the past 20years were identified via CiteSpace analysis. A total of 38 articles were selected and cross-examined by the co-researchers based on the adapted systematic review guide, specifically aiming at ensuring the quality of the study. The findings revealed a number of studies that designed their own STEM intervention (20), reported on understanding (16), attitude (30), and investigated the gender aspect (4) as well as the science practices (11). The findings also provided significant insights into the STEM education trend with an existing evidence base as reference for future STEM education research and development. In conclusion, this study presents the practicality and feasibility of using CiteSpace analysis in a systematic review. 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. |
| References |
Ardianti, S., Sulisworo, D., Pramudya, Y., & Raharjo, W. (2020). The impact of the use of STEM education approach on the blended learning to improve student’s critical thinking skills. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8, 24–32. Bamberger, Y. M. (2014). Encouraging girls into science and technology with feminine role model: Does this work? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(4), 549–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9487-7 Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2018). Robotics and STEM learning: Students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 task taxonomy—practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28(1), 121–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9385-9 Bell, D. (2015). The reality of STEM education, design and technology teachers’ perceptions: A phenomenographic study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-015-9300-9 Bennett, J., Lubben, F., Hogarth, S., & Campbell, B. (2005). Systematic reviews of research in science education: Rigour or rigidity? International Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069042000323719 Bishop, W. A. (2019). The development of management accounting skills in situations where practicalexposure is limited: The perceptions of training ofcers in South Africa. South African Journal of Higher Education, 33(4), 20–43. Blustein, D. L., Barnett, M., Mark, S., Depot, M., Lovering, M., Lee, Y., Hu, Q., Kim, J., Backus, F., Dillon-Lieberman, K., & DeBay, D. (2013). Examining urban students’ constructions of a STEM/career development intervention over time. Journal of Career Development, 40(1), 40–67. Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5–9. Brown, J. (2012). The current status of STEM education research. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(5), 7–11. Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30–35. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA press. Camarao, M. K. G., & Nava, F. J. G. (2017). High school students’ difculties in physics. In A paper presented at the National Conference on Research in Teacher Education (NCRTE), Quezon City, The Philippines. Cantrell, P., & Ewing-Taylor, J. (2009). Exploring STEM career options through collaborative high school seminars. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830. 2009.tb01026.x Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Ofcial Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20237 Çevik, M. (2018). Impacts of the Project Based (PBL) Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education on academic achievement and career interests of vocational high school students. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 8(2), 281–306. Chacko, P., Appelbaum, S., Kim, H., Zhao, J., & Montclare, J. K. (2015). Integrating technology in STEM education. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 5(1), 5–14. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.124 Chang, S. H., Ku, A. C., Yu, L. C., Wu, T. C., & Kuo, B. C. (2015). A science, technology, engineering and mathematics course with computer-assisted remedial learning system support for vocational high school students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(5), 641–654. Chen, C. (2004). Searching for intellectual turning points: Progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(SUPPL. 1), 5303–5310. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307513100 Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientifc literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(3), 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20317 Chen, C., Hu, Z., Liu, S., & Tseng, H. (2012). Emerging trends in regenerative medicine: A scientometric analysis in CiteSpace. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, 12(5), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2012.674507 Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21309 Chittum, J. R., Jones, B. D., Akalin, S., & Schram, Á. B. (2017). The efects of an afterschool STEM program on students’ motivation and engagement. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0065-4 Chonkaew, P., Sukhummek, B., & Faikhamta, C. (2016). Development of analytical thinking ability and attitudes towards science learning of grade-11 students through science technology engineering and mathematics (STEM education) in the study of stoichiometry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 842–861. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00074F Chu, W. W., Ong, E. T., Ayop, S. K.,Mohd Azmi, M. S., Abdullah, A. S., Abd Karim, N. S., & Tho, S. W. (2021). The innovative use of smartphone for sound STEM practical kit: a pilot implementation for secondary classroom. Research in Science & Technological Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1978963 Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE publications. Crisp, G., Nora, A., & Taggart, A. (2009). Student characteristics, pre-college, college, and environmental factors as predictors of majoring in and earning a STEM degree: An analysis of students attending a Hispanic serving institution. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 924–942. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831209349460 Cui, Y., Mou, J., & Liu, Y. (2018). Knowledge mapping of social commerce research: A visual analysis using CiteSpace. Electronic Commerce Research, 18, 837–868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-018-9288-9 Cwikla, J., Milroy, S., Reider, D., & Skelton, T. (2014). Pioneering mars: Turning the red planet green with earth’s smallest settlers. The American Biology Teacher, 76(5), 300–305. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2014.76.5.2 De Leo-Winkler, M. A., Wilson, G., Green, W., Chute, L., Henderson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2019). The vibrating universe: Astronomy for the deaf. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(3), 222–230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9761-1 Emdin, C., Adjapong, E., & Levy, I. (2016). Hip-hop based interventions as pedagogy/therapy in STEM. Journal for Multicultural Education, 10(3), 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-03-2016-0023 English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1 Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating (EPPI). (2007). Guideline Tools for Keywording and Data Extraction. EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit. Retrieved from https://eppi. ioe.ac.uk/cms/Default.aspx?tabid=184#Guidelines. Fung, C. H. (2020). How does fipping classroom foster the STEM education: A case study of the FPD model. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09443-9 Gardner, M., & Tillotson, J. W. (2019). Interpreting integrated STEM: Sustaining pedagogical innovation within a public middle school context. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(7), 1283–1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9927-6 Ghadiri Khanaposhtani, M., Liu, C. C. J., Gottesman, B. L., Shepardson, D., & Pijanowski, B. (2018). Evidence that an informal environmental summer camp can contribute to the construction of the conceptual understanding and situational interest of STEM in middle-school youth. International Journal of Science Education, Part b: Communication and Public Engagement, 8(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2018.1451665 Gülen, S. (2018). Determination of the efect of STEM-integrated argumentation based science learning approach in solving daily life problems. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 10(4), 95–114. Gülen, S. (2019). The efect of STEM education roles on the solution of daily life problems. Participatory Educational Research, 6(2), 37–50. Hafz, N. R. M., & Ayop, S. K. (2019). Engineering design process in Stem education: A systematic review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(5), 676-697. Hanley, T., & Cutts, L. (2013). What is a systematic review? Counselling Psychology Review, 28(4), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebn.2011.0049 Hochberg, K., Gröber, S., Kuhn, J., & Müller, A. (2014). The spinning disc: Studying radial acceleration and its damping process with smartphone acceleration sensors. Physics Education, 49(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/49/2/137 |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |