Alternative pedagogy approaches in physical education and health education

Mohd Izwan Shahril

Abstract

This study aims to develop alternative pedagogical approaches to Physical Education and Health Education. The development of the alternative pedagogical approaches is based on 21st-century learning, Constructivism Theory, Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), and Revised Bloom's Taxonomy. The research design used the pre-experimental one-shot case study method A sample of 65 Physical Education teachers was obtained through purposive sampling. The data were analyzed descriptively using mean and percentage. Subsequently, the effectiveness of the alternative pedagogical approaches and the interobserver agreement was evaluated using a questionnaire. The 8 alternative pedagogical approaches that have been developed include Music (95%), Commentary Review (85%), Plotter Sketch (95%), Body Metaphor (85%), Ideaspora (90%), Extrapolation (85%), Stage Play (85%), and Skimps (95%). The percentage of an interobserver agreement to use the alternative pedagogical approaches developed exceeds 70% agreement between the testers, and the value shows that it can be used. Overall, the developed alternative pedagogy approaches can be used as a guide for teachers to choose appropriate teaching methods during the teaching and learning process. 2023, North American Business Press. All rights reserved.

References

Algahtani, F. (2017). Teaching students with intellectual disabilities: Constructivism or behaviorism? Educational Research and Reviews, 12(21), 1031–1035.

Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001).A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.

Ariffin, N.A., & Yunus, F. (2017). Kesediaan guru prasekolah dalam melaksanakan KBAT dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran.Simposium Pendidikan diperibadikan: Perspektif Risalah An-Nur.

Curriculum Development Division. (2016). Standard curriculum of special education high school,physical education and health education. Curriculum standard document and assessment level 2. Putrajaya. Malaysia Education Ministry.

Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Columbus: Merrill Greenwood.

Gunduz, N., & Hursena, C. (2015). Constructivism in teaching and learning: Content analysis Evaluation. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 526–533.

Hausman, N.L., Javed, N., Bednar, M.K., Guell, M., Schaller, E., Nevill, R.E., & Kahng, S. (2022). Interobserver agreement: A preliminary investigation into how much is enough?Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis,55(2), 357–368.

Idris, N. (2013).Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. McGraw-Hill Education.

Mahamod, Z., & Embi, M.A. (2005). Penggunaan strategi pembelajaran bahasa untuk menguasai kemahiran membaca.Sains Humanika,42(1).

Malaysia Education Ministry. (2013). Higher Level Thinking Skills (KBAT) for School Guidance.Putrajaya, Malaysia.

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysian education development plan 2013–2025. Putrajaya: Curriculum Development Division.

Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2019). Revised Bloom’s taxonomy and major theories and frameworks that influence the teaching, learning, and assessment of mathematics: A comparison.International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology,50(6), 895–920.

Rink, J. (2010).Teaching physical education for learning(pp. 350–370). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Saad, L. (2017).Pentaksiran pembelajaran kemahiran asas bagi permainan kategori serangan dalam Pendidikan Jasmani tahun 4.[Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris].

Salehudin, N.N., Hassan, N.H., & Hamid, N.A.A. (2015). Matematik Dan Kemahiran Abad Ke-21: Perspektif Pelajar (Mathematics and the 21st Century Skills: Students’ Perspective).Jurnal Pendidikan Matematik,3(1), 24–36.

Salimin, N., Jani, J., Ishak, N.A., Hassan, S., Elumalai, G., Boon, O.K., & Shahril, M.I. (2014). Validity and Reliability of Comprehensive Assessment Instruments for Professional Skills in Field and Court Sport Among Major Students Coaching Based on Model K.International Journal of Humanities, Arts, Medicine and Sciences (BEST: IJHAMS) ISSN (E), pp. 2348–0521.

Shahril, M.I., Salimin, N., Aziz, S.A., & Saryono, M. (2018, December). The Effectiveness of Task Assessment Standard (TASk) in the Teaching and Learning Process of Physical and Health Education Teachers. In2nd Yogyakarta International Seminar on Health, Physical Education, and Sport Science (YISHPESS 2018) and 1st Conference on Interdisciplinary Approach in Sports (CoIS 2018)(pp. 105–108).

Atlantis Press.Shahril, M.I.B., & Salimin, N.B. (2015). The validity and reliability of iso test towards the performance assessment of future physical education teachers in teaching and learning process.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,195, 814–820.

Teacher Education Institute Malaysia. (2019). Assessment handbook 2019 edition. Cyberjaya.

Tee, T.K., Ramlan, A., Azman, M.N.A., Bagus., N.R.P.A., Sukardi, Risfendra, & Abd Hamid, R.I. (2022). Mastery Issues and Teaching Approaches for the Electrical Technology Certificate Programme at Community Colleges on the Topic of Measuring Instruments.Asian Pendidikan, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.53797/aspen.v2i1.1.2022

Topolovčan, T., & Matijević, M. (2016). Constructivist Learning and Digital Media. InInternational conference on knowledge, innovation and enterprise. Research papers on knowledge, innovation and enterprise(pp. 78–98).

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge:Harvard University Press.