UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :L Education (General)
ISSN :2014-5349
Main Author :Mohd Ridhuan Mohd Jamil
Title :The design and development of a learning strategy to enhance students’ engagement in simultaneous equations: an evaluation viewpoint
Place of Production :Tanjung Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2023
Notes :Journal of Technology and Science Education
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link :Click to view web link

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
In the 21st century, teaching and learning mathematics courses witness significant expansion and development of technology use, which creates a shift from teacher-centred to student-centred learning engagement. Student engagement (SE) faces many challenges of poor performance and student difficulty in solving simultaneous equations involving indices (SEII), among others. This paper presents an evaluation viewpoint of the learning strategy (LS) with cooperative learning strategy (CLS) and GeoGebra (GG) integration to support SE in SEII. The LS employs the think-pair-share approach and the six (6) principles of learning phases associated with constructivism ideology. The discussion of the preliminary mathematical achievement test (MAT-test) from pre-and post-tests with 41 students who have learned SEII using the developed LS is also presented. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with three experienced lecturers to provide feedback and recommendations on interacting with LS. The themes that emerge from those lecturers include the connection between LS phases, specific material, cooperative activity, playfulness in the discovery process, and thinking. Experts feedback on the LSs content reasoning and content learning strategy through a questionnaire was tested using Fleiss multi-rater Kappa and showed good inter-rater reliability and agreement between them. The estimated marginal means covariate of the ANCOVA test was then examined, and the results supported the necessity for a learning strategy to be developed. The findings revealed that the LS, with CLS and GG integration, has the potential to be educationally effective in enhancing SE in SEII. Articles contents are provided on an Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 Creative commons International License. Readers are allowed to copy, distribute and communicate articles contents, provided the authors and JOTSE journals names are included. It must not be used for commercial purposes. To see the complete licence contents, please visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

References

Abdurrahman, M.S., Abdullah, A.H., & Osman, S. (2020). Developing mathematical thinking among polytechnic students in linear algebra through peer tutoring strategy. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(3), 423-434. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V12I3/20201210

Aliyu, J., Osman, S., Kumar, J.A., Talib, C.A., & Jambari, H. (2022). Students ’ Engagement through Technology and Cooperative Learning : A Systematic Literature Revie. International Journal of Learning and Development, 12(3), 23-40. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijld.v12i3.20051

Aliyu, J., Osman, S., Daud, M.F., & Kumar, J.A. (2021). Mathematics teachers’ pedagogy through technology: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 323-341. https://doi.org/10.26803/IJLTER.20.1.18

Alqahtani, M.M., & Powell, A.B. (2017). Mediational activities in a dynamic geometry environment and teachers’ specialized content knowledge. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48(July), 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.004

Attard, C. (2012). Engagement with mathematics: What does it mean and what does it look like? Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 17(1), 9-13.

Berger, J.L., & Karabenick, S.A. (2011). Motivation and students’ use of learning strategies: Evidence of unidirectional effects in mathematics classrooms. Learning and Instruction, 21(3), 416-428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.06.002

Bessong, F.E., Ubana, U.A., & Udo, D.E. (2013). Status of the Quality of Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Nigerian Colleges of Education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 2(5), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.5901/ajis.2013.v2n5p17

Chief Examiner’s Report (2018). The West African Examinations Council Chief Examiners’ Report. Available at: https://www.waecgh.org/uploads/examinersReport/

Christenson, S.L., Wylie, C., & Reschly, A.L. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. In Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7

Creswel, J.W. (2014). Research Design. In Printed in the United States of America Library of Congress Catalogingin-Publication Data.

Curry, J. (2016). a Qualitative Study of Peer Tutoring Developmental Mathematics At The University Level. Disertation. Kent State University College of Education, Health, and Human Services.

Ugboduma, O. (2013). Students’ Preference of Method of Solving Simultaneous Equations. Global Journal of Educational Research, 11(2), 129-136. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v11i2.8

Usman, M. (2019). Concept Mapping Instructional Strategy and Senior Secondary Students’ Performances and Interest in Algebra in Bauchi State. Abacus (Mathematics Education Series), 44(1), 236-243. https://man-nigeria.org.ng/issues/ABA-EDU-2019-30.pdf

Veiga, F.H., Reeve, J., Wentzel, K., & Robu, V. (2014). Assessing students’ engagement: A review of instruments with psychometric Qualities. Envolvimento Dos Alunos Na Escola: Perspetivas Internacionais Da Psicologia e Educaçao / Students’ Engagement in School: International Perspectives of Psychology and Education, 38-57. http://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/18036

Vveinhardt, J., & Gulbovaitė, E. (2016). Expert Evaluation of Diagnostic Instrument for Personal and Organizational Value Congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(3), 481-501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2527-7

Wahab, R.A. (2017). Evaluation by Experts and Designated Users on the Learning Strategy using SketchUp Make for Elevating Visual Spatial Skills and Geometry Thinking / Avaliação de Peritos eUtilizadores Indicados na Estratégia de Aprendizagem Usando o SketchUp Make no Aumento das Competências Visual-Espacial e Pensamento Geométrico. Boletim de Educação Matemática, 31(58). https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v31n58a15

Wang, X. (2015). The Literature Review of Algebra Learning: Focusing on the Contributions to Students’ Difficulties. Creative Education, 06(02), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2015.62013

Warner, S., & Kaur, A. (2017). The Perceptions of Teachers and Students on a 21 st Century Mathematics Instructional Model. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Educatione, 12(2), 193-215. https://www.iejme.com/article/the-perceptions-of-teachers-and-students-on-a-21st-century-mathematicsinstructional-model https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/609

Zengin, Y., & Tatar, E. (2017). Integrating dynamic mathematics software into cooperative learning environments in mathematics. Educational Technology and Society, 20(2).

Zulnaidi, H., Oktavika, E., & Hidayat, R. (2020). Effect of use of GeoGebra on achievement of high school mathematics students. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 51-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09899-y

Zulnaidi, H., & Zamri, S. (2017). The effectiveness of the geogebra software: The intermediary role of procedural knowledge on students’ conceptual knowledge and their achievement in mathematics. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01219a


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.