Challenges and strategies for implementing the Activator School program

Sri Marmoah

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :	Sri Marmoah
Additional Authors :	Sri Surachmi W Sri Utaminingsih Slamet Utomo Yantoro
Title :	Challenges and strategies for implementing the Activator School program

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2023
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The implementation of school drive programs still needs to be improved. This study discusses the challenges and strategies involved in implementing the Activator School Program. In this study, mixed-methods research was used. The study included six principals and thirty elementary school teachers from Surakarta, Indonesia. To collect data for this study, questionnaires, interviews, observations, and documentation were used. The data analysis techniques used were descriptive statistics for quantitative analysis. Meanwhile, for qualitative analysis, the research used the Miles and Huberman method, that is, data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. The findings of this study include the challenges and obstacles to the implementation of the activator school program, educators' inability to control teachers' level of digital technology mastery, a lack of socialization related to the curriculum of the activator school program, and an lack of educational facilities that support the activator school program. Strategies to ensure that the implementation of the activator school program runs smoothly include socialization and assistance to teachers and principals regarding the programs, curriculum, improvement and mentoring of teachers in mastering digital technology, particularly information and technology mastery, provision of adequate facilities for schools serving as the activator school program, and enhancement of educational quality. Keywords: activator, school program, challenges, strategies

References

Creswel JW. (2018). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 2nd Ed

University of Nebraska.

Ellya N, Daharnis, Yeni Erita AF. (2021). Projek penguatan profil pelajar pancasila dalam implementasi kurikulum prototipe di sekolah penggerak jenjang sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 6349-6356.

Etikan I, Musa SA, Alkassim RS. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.

Fetra Bonita Sari, Risda Amini M. (2020). Nilai kearifan lokal: projek paradigma baru program sekolah penggerak untuk mewujudkan profil pelajar pancasila. Jurnal Basicedu, 3(2), 524-532.

Goe L, Wylie EC, Bosso D, Olson D. (2018). State of-the States’ Teacher Evaluation and Support Systems: A Perspective From Exemplary Teachers. ETS Research Report Series, 1, 1-27.

Goldhaber D, Hansen M. (2010). Race, gender, and teacher testing: how informative a tool is teacher licensure testing? American Educational Research Journal, 1, 1-34.

Good TL. (2013). Teacher effectiveness in the elementary school. Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 52-64.

Guba EG, Lincoln YS. (2005). The sage handbook of qualittative research. In Third Edition. Sage Publication.

Harapan E. (2017). Visi kepala sekolah sebagai penggerak mutu pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen, Kepemimpinan, Dan Supervisi Pendidikan, 1(2), 133-145.

Jaekel AK, Wagner W, Trautwein U, Göllner R. (2022). The teacher motivates us – or me?” – the role of the addressee in student ratings of teacher support. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 71, 1-10.

Kemendikbud RI. (2021). Program Sekolah Penggerak 2021. In Kemendikbud. Kemendikbud RI. https://sekolah.penggerak.kemdikbud.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Paparan-Program-Sekolah-Penggerak.pdf

Kristiawan M. (2013). The Implementation of cooperative learning in English class of favorite School of secondary high school 5 Batusangkar, West Sumatera. International Journal of Educational Administration and Policy Studies, 5(6), 85-90.

Mahendra Y, Nuha U, Suryani R, Agyus V. (2019). Pengembangan pendidikan karakter menuju transformasi abad-21. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Univ Muhammadiyah Jakarta, 187-191.

Miles MB, Huberman AM, Saldana J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: a methods sourcebook. 4th Ed., Sage Publications.

Muji AP, Gistituati N, Bentri A, Falma FO. (2021). Evaluation of the implementation of the s ekolah penggerak Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(3), 377-384.

Mutiara A, Wagiran W, Pristiwati R. (2022). Pengembangan buku pengayaan elektronik cerita fabel bermuatan profil pelajar pancasila elemen gotong royong sebagai media literasi membaca di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(2), 2419-2429.

O’Cathain A, Elizabeth M, Nicholl J. (2007). Mengapa, dan bagaimana, penelitian metode campuran dilakukan dalam penelitian layanan kesehatan di Inggris: studi metode campuran. BMC Health Service Research, 7(85), 15.

Patilima S. (2022). Sekolah penggerak sebagai upaya peningkatan kualitas pendidikan. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, 1, 228-236.

Rahayu S, Rossari D. (2021). Hambatan guru sekolah dasar dalam melaksanakan kurikulum sekolah penggerak dari sisi manajeman waktu dan ruang di era pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(3), 5759-5768.

Safrizal S, Nurhafizah N, Yulia R, Husnani H. (2022). Analysis of guru penggerak programs as sustainable professional development for teachers. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(2), 2135-2142.

Satriawan W, Santika ID, Naim A, Tarbiyah F, Raya B, Selatan L, Timur L, Bakoman A, Panggung P. (2021). Guru penggerak dan transformasi sekolah dalam kerangka inkuiri apresiatif. Al-Idarah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 11(1), 1-12.

Sibagariang D, Sihotang H, Murniarti E, Indonesia UK. (2021). Peran guru penggerak dalam pendidikan merdeka belajar di Indonesia. Dinamika Pendidikan, 14(2), 88-99.

Siregar BH, Mansyur A. (2021). Pendampingan guru-guru penggerak dalam pengembangan bahan ajar digital interaktif untuk mengoptimalkan proses belajar. Seminar Nasional Pengapdian Kepada Masyarakat, September, 96-100.

Syafi’i FF. (2021). Merdeka belajar: sekolah penggerak. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar “Merdeka Belajar Dalam Menyambut Era Masyarakat 5.0,” November, 46-47.

Terry GR. (1976). Principles of Management (6th ed.). R.D. Irwin.

Tongco MDC. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 5, 147-158.

Triati, Jalius N, Ridwan. (2022). School Management in the 'Sekolah Penggerak' curriculum in vocational high school. Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan, 5(2), 53-56.

Zamjani I, Aditomo A, Pratiwi I. (2020). Naskah akademik program sekolah penggerak. in kementerian pendidikan dan kebudayaan. pusat penelitian kebijkan badan penelitian dan pengembangan dan perbukuan kemdikbud. https://sekolah.penggerak.kemdikbud.go.id/programsekolahpenggerak

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page