Development of Project-Based Learning E-Module by utilizing the Arduino for the topic of impulse and its usability

Bernet Parantis@Francis

QR Code Link :
Type :	final_year_project
Subject :	QC Physics
Main Author :	Bernet Parantis@Francis
Title :	Development of Project-Based Learning E-Module by utilizing the Arduino for the topic of impulse and its usability

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :	2024
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :	Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

This study aims to develop a Project-Based Learning E-Module by utilizing the Arduino for the topic of impulse and examine its validity and usability among trainee physics teachers. ADDIE model was followed in the development of the PjBL e-module where the problem was analysed, the e-module was designed, and then developed using Canva. Constructivism learning theory, Inquiry-Based learning, Experiential Learning Theory and Cognitive Load Theory was implemented into the e-module to make the e-module meet the learning style of 21st-century learning. After that, the e-module then goes to implementation phase before finally getting its usability evaluated. The PjBL e-module has been read and evaluated by 56 Semester 7 physics students selected via convenience sampling. The mean value of the usability obtained is 3.67, which proves that the e-module has achieved a high usability level among trainee physics teachers. The PjBL e-module surely will help trainee physics teachers to teach the topic of impulse for Form 4 Physics since the e-module is useful for them, easy to use and satisfy their need for teaching the topic.

References

Avila, G. (2019). Project-Based Learning: Projects for Academic Excellence. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.csumb.edu/caps_thes_all/434.

Bledsoe, R., & Richardson, D. (2020). Maximizing learning using cognitive load theory. ETH Learning and Teaching Journal, 2(2), 148–152. https://doi.org/ https://doi.org/10.16906/lt-eth.v2i2.121

Cleofe, M. R. P., & Panoy, J. F. D. (2022). Project-based digitized module in enhancing scientific competencies among distance learning students. APJAET - Journal Asia Pacific Journal of Advanced Education and Technology. https://doi.org/10.54476/apjaet/03734

Conger, S., Krauss, K. E. M., & Simuja, C. (2017). New pedagogical approaches with technologies. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 13(4), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijthi.2017100105

Desai, S., & Patel, N. (2020). ABC of face validity for questionnaire. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences Review and Research, 65(1), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.47583/ijpsrr.2020.v65i01.025

Dubey, S. K., & Rana, A. (2010). Analytical Roadmap to Usability Definitions and Decompositions. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 2(9), 4723–4729. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282848700_Analytical_Roadmap_to_Usa

bility_Definitions_and_Decompositions#:~:text=ISO%209241%2D11%20(1998),1998)%20provided%20usability.

Ghavifekr, S. & Rosdy, W.A.W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 175-191.

Gholam, A. (2019). Inquiry-Based Learning: Student Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions. Journal of Inquiry & Action in Education, 10(2), 112–130. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1241559.pdf

Golder, J. (2018). CONSTRUCTIVISM: A PARADIGM FOR TEACHING AND LEARNING. International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR), 5(3), 678–686. https://ijrar.org/papers/IJRAR1903214.pdf

Hamdi Serin. (2018). A Comparison of Teacher-Centered and Student-Centered Approaches in Educational Settings. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5 (1). pp. 164-167. ISSN 24091294

Hamzah, M., Juraime, F. and Mansor, A. (2016) Malaysian Principals’ Technology Leadership Practices and Curriculum Management. Creative Education, 7, 922-930. doi: 10.4236/ce.2016.77096.

Hawthorne, B. S., Vella-Brodrick, D. A., & Hattie, J. (2019). Well-being as a cognitive load reducing agent: A review of the literature. Frontiers in Education, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00121

Kalalo, D., Katuuk, D., Lengkong, J., & Rotty, V. N. (2023). Innovative 21st century learning through PAKEM learning management. Tadbir: Jurnal Studi Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(1), 231-244. https://doi.org/10.29240/jsmp.v7i1.6966

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. http://academic.regis.edu/ed205/Kolb.pdf

Konting, M. M., Kamaruddin, N., & Man, N. A. (2009). Quality Assurance in higher education institutions: Exist survey among Universiti Putra Malaysia graduating students. International Education Studies, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v2n1p25

Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). In Project-based learning, & R. K. Sawyer (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences, (2nd ed., pp. 275–297). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607–610.

Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3-6. (www.stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/index.htmi)

Mahardika, I. K., Rasagama, I. G., Indrianto, L., Doyan, A., & Supeno. (2020). Validity of physical learning module based on multiple representation and higher order

thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1465(1), 012057. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1465/1/012057

Markula, A., Aksela, M. The key characteristics of project-based learning: how teachers implement projects in K-12 science education. Discip Interdscip Sci Educ Res 4, 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-021-00042-x

McGriff, S. J. (2000). Instructional system design (ISD): Using the addie model. Instructional System Design (ISD): Using the ADDIE Model. https://www.lib.purdue.edu/sites/default/files/directory/butler38/ADDIE.pdf

Mcleod, S. (2023). Kolb’s learning Styles & Experiential Learning Cycle. Simply Psychology. https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html

Mohd Arof, K. Z., Ismail, S., & Najib, N. H. (2020). Critical causal factors of failure (CCFF) in adopting a biophilic city concept in Malaysia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(05). https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.05.14

Mohd Idriki, N. A., & Tan, B. P. (2022). Aplikasi pembelajaran abad ke-21 dalam talian: cabaran guru Pendidikan Moral [21st century online learning applications: the challenge of Moral Education teachers]. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 6(1), 16-35. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/174

Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). What Is Convenience Sampling? | Definition & Examples. Scribbr. Retrieved May 29, 2023, from https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/convenience-sampling/.

Nur Izzati Rozman. (2018). Pengukuran Dalam Penyelidikan: Kebolehpercayaan Dan Kesahan Dalam kajian. Academia.edu. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/38027643/PENGUKURAN_DALAM_PENYELIDIKAN_KEBOLEHPERCAYAAN_DAN_KESAHAN_DALAM_KAJIAN.

Nurnaifah, I. I., Anggriani, S., Zulpiah, A., & Wahyuni, S. (2023). Increasing students’ physics learning outcomes through experiential learning model. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 11(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v11i1.9590

Richey, R. C. (1994). Developmental Research: The Definition and Scope. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED373753.pdf

Richey, R. C., & Klein, J. D. (2005). Developmental research methods: Creating knowledge from instructional design and development practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02961473

Russo, A., & Adorno, D. P. (2018). An inquiry-based learning path to introduce modern physics in high-school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1076. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1076/1/012007/pdf

Shah, R. K. (2019). Effective Constructivist Teaching Learning in the Classroom. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(4). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED598340.pdf

Shpeizer, R. (2019). Towards a successful integration of project-based learning in higher education: Challenges, technologies and methods of implementation. Universal

Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1765–1771. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.070815

Sumarna, C., & Gunawan, H. (2022). Foundations of Constructivism Philosophy in Classroom Learning. International Journal of Science and Society, 4(3), 53-65. https://doi.org/10.54783/ijsoc.v4i3.499.

Sweller, J., van Merrienboer, J.J.G. & Paas, F.G.W.C. Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design. Educational Psychology Review 10, 251–296 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205

Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2012). Designing learning modules for online courses: The Five-WH approach. International Forum, 15(2), 29–41. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263277960_Designing_learning_modules_for_online_courses_The_Five-WH_approach

Yu, S.-Y. (2022). Research on the learning effect of experiential learning theory applied to design education. ECE Official Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.22492/issn.2188-1162.2022.38

Yunus, H. (2018). The Importance of Student-centered Learning (SCL) in Indonesian Higher Education. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/papers/aceid2018/ACEID2018_39937.pdf

Yusoff, M. S. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal, 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page