Abend, G. (2008). The meaning of ‘theory’. Sociological theory, 26(2), 173-199. 

Ackerman, J. M. (1993). The promise of writing to learn. Written communication, 10(3), 334­370. 

Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & education, 33(2­3), 131-152. 

Al-Jarf, R. (2009). Enhancing Freshman Students’ Writing Skills with A Mind-Mapping Software. In Conference proceedings of eLearning and Software for Education (eLSE) (Vol. 5, No. 01, pp. 375-382). Carol I National Defence University Publishing House. 

Al Kamli, H. M. (2019). The effect of using mind maps to enhance EFL learners' writing achievement and students' attitudes towards writing at Taif University. Arab World English Journal, 232, 1-92. 

Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers & Education, 144, 103695. 

Appstore. (2013). App Store is a service mark of Apple Inc. Retrieved from http://popplet.com. 

Ardac, D., & Akaygun, S. (2004). Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change. Journal of research in science teaching, 41(4), 317-337. 

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Canada: Nelson Education, Ltd. 

Aydin, S., Aydemir, N., Boz, Y., Cetin-Dindar, A., & Bektas, O. (2009). The contribution of constructivist instruction accompanied by concept mapping in enhancing pre-service chemistry teachers’ conceptual understanding of chemistry in the laboratory 

course. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 518-534. 

Balasundram, N., & Karpudewan, M. (2020). Embedding multiple modes of representations in open-ended tests on learning transition elements. Science Education in the 21st Century: Re-searching Issues that Matter from Different Lenses, 113-136. 

Balasundram, N., & Karpudewan, M. (2021). Exploring the use of a writing-to-learn activity embedded with multiple modes using ‘Popplet’on pre-university students’alternative conceptions on transition metals. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 263-281. 

Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research, 74(1), 29-58. 

Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. S., & Silberstein, J. (1986). Is an atom of copper malleable?. Journal of chemical education, 63(1), 64. 

Bhardwaj, P. (2019). Types of sampling in research. Journal of the Practice of Cardiovascular Sciences, 5(3), 157. 

Bollen, K. A. (2002). Latent variables in psychology and the social sciences. Annual review of psychology, 53(1), 605-634. 

Boscolo, P., & Mason, L. (2001). Writing to learn, writing to transfer. Writing as a learning tool: Integrating theory and practice, 83-104. 

Bozkoyun, Y. (2004). Facilitating conceptual change in learning rate of reaction concepts (Master's thesis, Middle East Technical University). 

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2007). The development of a two-tier multiple-choice diagnostic instrument for evaluating secondary school students’ability to describe and explain chemical reactions using multiple levels of 

representation. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 8(3), 293-307. 

Chandrasegaran, A. L., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2008). An evaluation of a teaching intervention to promote students’ability to use multiple levels of representation when describing and explaining chemical reactions. Research in Science Education, 38, 237­248. 

Chen, C. A., Hsieh, C. W., & Chen, D. Y. (2021). Can training enhance public employees’ public service motivation? A pretest–posttest design. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 41(1), 194-215. 

Chmarkh, M. (2021). 'Writing to Learn'Research: A Synthesis of Empirical Studies (2004­2019). European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 85-96. 

Choo, S. Y., & Taha, H. (2023). Embracing gen-z's learning styles with a mobile enthalpy game application (MEGA) for thermochemical equation. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 42(1). 

Chua, Y. P. (2004). Kaedah penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill. 

Chuephangam, M. (2000). Analysis of misconception in chemistry of Mathayom Suska 5 students. Retrieved May, 10, 2023. 

Clark, R. C., Sweller, J. I., & Nguyen, F. I. (2006). Efficiency in learning: Evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.United States of America: Pearson Education, Inc. 

Demircioglu, G. (2003). Preparation and implementation of guide materials concerning the unit ‘Acids and Bases’ at lycee II level. PhD thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. 

Disessa, A. A. (2004). Metarepresentation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and instruction, 22(3), 293-331. 

Dunker, V. E. (2019). Case Study of High School Math and Science Teachers' Beliefs about Using Writing to Learn and Their Beliefs about Themselves as Writing-to-Learn Practitioners. 

Effendy. (2002). Upaya untuk mengatasi kesalahan konsep dalam pengajaran kimia dengan menggunakan strategi konflik kognitif [Efforts to overcome misconceptions in chemistry teaching by using cognitive conflict strategies]. Chemical Communication Media/ Media Komunikasi Kimia, 6(2), 1-22. 

Ekiz-Kiran, B., Boz, Y., & Oztay, E. S. (2021). Development of pre-service teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through a PCK-based school experience course. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 22(2), 415-430. 

Elijah, C. E. (2023). Effect of Power Point Presentation Mode on Student Achievement and Retention in Structure and Bonding in Chemistry Kaduna State (Doctoral Dissertation). 

Fahmi, F., & Irhasyuarna, Y. (2017). Misconceptions of Reaction Rates on High School Level in Banjarmasin. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 7(1), 54-61. 

Fry, S. W., & Villagomez, A. (2012). Writing to learn: Benefits and limitations. College Teaching, 60(4), 170-175. 

Galbraith, D., & Torrance, M. (1999). Conceptual processes in writing: From problem solving to text production. In D. Galbraith & M. Torrance (Eds.), Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 1–12). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press. 

Gall, M. D., Gall, J. P., & Borg, W. R. (2007). Educational research: an introduction (8. utg.). 

AE Burvikovs, Red.) USA: Pearson. 

García-Martínez, I., Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Cobos Sanchiz, D., & Luque de La Rosa, A. (2019). Using mobile devices for improving learning outcomes and teachers’ professionalization. Sustainability, 11(24), 6917. 

Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students. Journal of educational psychology, 99(3), 445. 

Griffiths, A. K. (1994). A critical analysis and synthesis of research on students’ chemistry misconceptions. Problem solving and misconceptions in chemistry and physics, 70-99. 

Gunel M., Hand B. and Gunduz S., (2006), Comparing student understanding of quantum physics when embedding multimodal representations into two different writing formats: Presentation format versus summary report format. Sci. Educ., 90(6), 1092–1112. 

Gunel, M., Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2007). Writing for learning in science: Asecondary analysis of six studies. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,5, 615-637. 

Gunel, M., Hand, B., & McDermott, M. A. (2009). Writing for different audiences: Effects on high-school students' conceptual understanding of biology. Learning and instruction, 19(4), 354-367. 

Isaac, S., & Michael, W. B. (1995). Handbook in research and evaluation: A collection of principles, methods, and strategies useful in the planning, design, and evaluation of studies in education and the behavioral sciences. 

Haele, R. & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence Based Nursing, 18(3), 66-67. 

Hand, B., Wallace, C. W., & Yang, E. M. (2004). Using a Science Writing Heuristic to enhance learning outcomes from laboratory activities in seventh-grade science: quantitative and qualitative aspects. International Journal of Science Education, 26(2), 131-149. 

Hand B. M., Gunel M. and Ulu C., (2009), Sequencing embedded multimodal representations in a writing to learn approach to the teaching of electricity. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 46(3), 225–247. 

Hapsari, E. W., & Sukavatee, P. (2018). Second language writing instruction: Arecent practice in Indonesia. Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 3(1), 24-48. 

Holliday, W. G., Yore, L. D., & Alvermann, D. E. (1994). The reading–science learning–writing connection: Breakthroughs, barriers, and promises. Journal of research in science teaching, 31(9), 877-893. 

Hopkyns, S., & Nicoll, T. (2021). Transforming Essay Writing Through App-

Smashing. International Journal of English for Specific Purposes, 2(1), 67-85. Houston, P. L. (2012). Chemical kinetics and reaction dynamics. Courier Corporation. Jackson, S. L. (2006). Research methods and statistics. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning. Jusniar, J., Effendy, E., Budiasih, E., & Sutrisno, S. (2020). Misconceptions in Rate of Reaction 

and Their Impact on Misconceptions in Chemical Equilibrium. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 1405-1423. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Dokumen standard kurikulum pentaksiran KSSM kimia tingkatan 4. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 

Kirik, Ö. T., & Boz, Y. (2012). Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice,13(3), 221­236. 

Klein, P. D. (1999). Reopening inquiry into cognitive process in writing-to-learn. Educational Psychology Review, 11(3), 203–270 

Koo, T. K., & Li, M. Y. (2016). AGuideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. Journal of chiropractic medicine, 15(2), 155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012 

Kousathana, M., & Tsaparlis, G. (2002). Students’ errors in Solving Numerical Chemical-Equilibrium Problems. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 3(1), 5-17. 

Kozma, R., Chin, E., Russell, J., & Marx, N. (2000). The roles of representations and tools in the chemistry laboratory and their implications for chemistry learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(2), 105-143. 

Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement, 30(3), 607-610. 

Lemke, J. (1998). Multiplying meaning. Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science, 87. 

Ma, C. M., Shek, D. T., & Chen, J. M. (2019). Changes in the participants in a community-based positive youth development program in Hong Kong: Objective outcome evaluation using a one-group pretest-posttest design. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 14, 961-979. 

Marshall, G., & Jonker, L. (2011). An introduction to inferential statistics: A review and practical guide. Radiography, 17(1), e1-e6. 

Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. 

Mayer, R. E. (2003). Learning and instruction. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall. 

McDermott, M. A. (2009). The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation on student construction of chemistry knowledge. The University of Iowa. 

McDermott, M. A., & Hand, B. (2013). The impact of embedding multiple modes of representation within writing tasks on high school students’ chemistry understanding. Instructional Science, 41, 217-246. 

McDermott M. and Hand B., (2016), Modelling Scientific Communication with Multimodal Writing Tasks: Impact on Students at Different Grade Levels, in Hand B., McDermott 

M. and Prain V. (ed.), Using multimodal representations to support learning in the science classroom, Switzerland: Springer, pp. 183–221. 

Meral, E., Kayaalp, F., & Basci Namli, Z. (2022). The Role of Argumentative Writing in Teaching Controversial Issues: A Mixed Methods Research. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 9(1), 143-163. 

Nagin, C. (2012). Because writing matters: Improving student writing in our schools. John Wiley & Sons. 

Nakiboglu, C. (2017). Use of graphic organizers in secondary chemistry lessons. The Eurasia Proceedings of Educational and Social Sciences, 7, 72-75. 

Newell, G. E. (2006). Writing to learn. Handbook of writing research, 235-247. 

Nixon, R. S., Smith, L. K., & Wimmer, J. J. (2015). Teaching multiple modes of representation 

in middle-school science classrooms: Impact on student learning and multimodal use. School Science and Mathematics, 115(4), 186-199. Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific literacy. Science education, 87(2), 224-240. Osman, K., Soh, Y. F., & Arsad, N. A. (2010). The Malaysian education system: Trends, issues, and challenges. The Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 1(4), 1-9. Özmen, H., DemIrcIoGlu, G., & Coll, R. K. (2009). A comparative study of the effects of a concept mapping enhanced laboratory experience on Turkish high school students’ understanding of acid-base chemistry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7, 1-24. Paas, F. G., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and motor skills, 79(1), 419-430. 

Pachman, M., Sweller, J., & Kalyuga, S. (2014). Effectiveness of combining worked examples and deliberate practice for high school geometry. Applied cognitive psychology, 28(5), 685-692. 

Pearson, K. (1895). Correlation coefficient. In Royal Society Proceedings (Vol. 58, p. 214). 

Peters, B. (2017). Reaction rate theory and rare events. Elsevier. 

Pifarré, M., & Fisher, R. (2011). Breaking up the writing process: how wikis can support understanding the composition and revision strategies of young writers. Language and Education, 25(5), 451-466. 

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497. 

Popplet, (2020), Retrieved December 2023 from http://www.popplet.com/. 

Reedy, G. B. (2015). Using cognitive load theory to inform simulation design and practice. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(8), 355-360. 

Reid, N. (2021). The Working Memory Story: Why Is It Difficult to Understand Chemistry?. 

Rivard, L. O. P. (1994). Areview of writing to learn in science: Implications for practice and research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 969-983. 

Salleh, R., & Jusoh, A. J. (2015). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan soal selidik egogram analisis transaksional dalam kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah. Jurnal PERKAMA, 19, 67-82. 

Sanger, M. J. (2000). Using particulate drawings to determine and improve students' conceptions of pure substances and mixtures. Journal of Chemical Education, 77(6), 762. 

Sessions, L., Kang, M. O., & Womack, S. (2016). The neglected “R”: Improving writing instruction through iPad apps. TechTrends, 60, 218-225. 

Seufert, T. (2003). Supporting coherence formation in learning from multiple representations. Learning and instruction, 13(2), 227-237. Sidek M. N. & Jamaludin A. 2005. Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana Membina Modul Latihan dan Modul Akademik. Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia. 

Sirhan, G. (2007). Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. 

Stieff, M., Hegarty, M., & Deslongchamps, G. (2011). Identifying representational competence with multi-representational displays. Cognition and Instruction, 29(1), 123-145. Sun, J., Zheng, C., Xie, E., Liu, Z., Chu, R., Qiu, J., ... & Li, Z. (2023). ASurvey of Reasoning with Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.11562. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 261-292. Tan, O. S. (2021). Problem-based learning innovation: Using problems to power learning in the 21st century. Gale Cengage Learning. 

Tan, S. C., Looi, C. K., Cheung, Y. L., Chung, S. H., Lim, S. J., & Wong, W. H. (2021). Designing and evaluating a mobile peer tutoring application: A cultural historical activity theory approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-12. 

Tasker, R., & Dalton, R. (2006). Research into practice: visualisation of the molecular world using animations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 7(2), 141-159. 

Tayib, A. M. (2015). The effect of using graphic organizers on writing (A case study of preparatory college students at Umm-Al-Qura University). International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research, 3(1), 15-36. 

Tolppanen, S., Rantaniitty, T., & Aksela, M. (2016). Effectiveness of a lesson on multimodal writing. Using multimodal representations to support learning in the science classroom, 39-57. 

Trochim, W. M. (2006). Introduction to validity. 

Upahi, J. E., & Ramnarain, U. (2019). Representations of chemical phenomena in secondary school chemistry textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 146­159. 

Vagg, T., Balta, J. Y., Bolger, A., & Lone, M. (2020). Multimedia in education: what do the students think?. Health Professions Education, 6(3), 325-333. 

Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press. 

Wallace, B., Maker, J., & Cave, D. (2004). Thinking skills and problem-solving: An Inclusive approach: a practical guide for teachers in primary schools. Routledge. 

Wang, M., & Lv, Z. (2022). Construction of personalized learning and knowledge system of chemistry specialty via the internet of things and clustering algorithm. The Journal of Supercomputing, 78(8), 10997-11014. 

Whitehead, D., & Murphy, F. (2014). “Mind Your Language” High School Students Write Laboratory Reports. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(6), 492-502. 

Willingham, D. T. (2021). Why don't students like school?: A cognitive scientist answers questions about how the mind works and what it means for the classroom. John Wiley & Sons. 

Wiyarsi, A., Sutrisno, H., & Rohaeti, E. (2018, September). The effect of multiple representation approach on students’ creative thinking skills: A case of ‘Rate of Reaction’topic. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012054). IOP Publishing. 

Yore, L., Bisanz, G. L., & Hand, B. M. (2003). Examining the literacy component of science literacy: 25 years of language arts and science research. International journal of science education, 25(6), 689-725. 

Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy—empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2-3), 291-314. 

Zammit, K. (2016). Responding to literature: iPads, apps and multimodal text creation. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 24(2), 8-16. 

Zomer, T., Neely, A., Sacks, R., & Parlikad, A. (2021). Exploring the influence of socio-historical constructs on BIM implementation: an activity theory perspective. Construction management and economics, 39(1), 1-20. 

Zorluoglu, S. L., & Kizilaslan, A. (2019). Analysis of 10th Chemistry Curriculum According to Revised Bloom Taxonomy. Journal of Education and e-learning Research, 6(2), 88­95.