Abd Samad, M. R., Iksan, Z., & Khalid, F. (2019). Acceptance and readiness to use M-learning among primary school science teachers. Creative Education, 10(12), 3003–3011. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2019.1012224 

Abd Samad, M. R., Iksan, Z., & Khalid, F. (2020). A systematic review : The integration of mobile applications in science education . Are you ready? International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(2), 846–862. 

Abd Samad, M. R., Iksan, Z., & Khalid, F. (2022). Analisis keperluan : Pembangunan aplikasi mudah alih sains tahun lima sekolah kebangsaan luar bandar di Malaysia [Needs analysis: Development of year five science mobile applications for rural national schools in Malaysia]. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 12(2), 1–15. 

Abdi, A. (2014). The effect of inquiry-based learning method on students’ academic achievement in science course. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020104 

Academy of Sciences Malaysia. (2018). Malaysian Educational Module on Responsible Conduct of Research. Academy of Sciences Malaysia. 

Academy of Sciences Malaysia. (2021). Science Outlook 2020: Unlocking the Future. Academy of Sciences Malaysia. 

Adelman, C. (1993). Kurt Lewin and the origins of action research. Educational Action Research, 1(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079930010102 

Akuma, F. V., & Callaghan, R. (2019). A systematic review characterizing and clarifying intrinsic teaching challenges linked to inquiry-based practical work. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(5), 619–648. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21516 

Allen, M. (2020). Misconceptitions in Primary Science (3rd ed.). Open University Press. 

Altrichter, H., Feldman, A., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers Investigate Their Work: An Introduction To Action Research Across The Professions (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315811918 

Amprazis, A., Papadopoulou, P., & Malandrakis, G. (2021). Plant blindness and children’s recognition of plants as living things: A research in the primary schools context. Journal of Biological Education, 55(2), 139–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1667406 

Anderson, J. L., Ellis, J. P., & Jones, A. M. (2014). Understanding early elementary children’s conceptual knowledge of plant structure and function through drawings. CBE Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 375–386. 

Ansari, I. (2019). The 5Es inquiry-based Lesson plan activities and the Preservice Science T eachers ’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge ( TPACK ) Development. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 9(5), 58–64. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0905015864 

Baas, D., Castelijns, J., Vermeulen, M., Martens, R., & Segers, M. (2015). The relation between assessment for learning and elementary students’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 33– 46. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12058 

Babakr, Z. H., Mohamedamin, P., & Kakamad, K. (2019). Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory: Critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 2(3), 517– 524. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.84 

Baharom, M. M., Atan, N. A., Rosli, M. S., Yusof, S., & Hamid, M. Z. A. (2020). Integration of science learning apps based on Inquiry Based Science Education (IBSE) in enhancing students Science Process Skills (SPS). International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(9), 95–109. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i09.11706 

Barana, A., Conte, A., Fissore, C., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2019). Learning analytics to improve formative assessment strategies. Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(3), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.20368/1971-8829/1135057 

Baroudi, S., & Rodjan Helder, M. (2021). Behind the scenes: Teachers’ perspectives on factors affecting the implementation of inquiry-based science instruction. Research in Science and Technological Education, 39(1), 68–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1651259 

Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006­9008-5 

Barrutia, O., & Díez, J. R. (2021). 7 to 13-year-old students’ conceptual understanding of plant nutrition: Should we be concerned about elementary teachers’ instruction? Journal of Biological Education, 55(2), 196–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1679655 

Bartoszeck, B. A., Cosmo, C. R., Silva, B. R. da, & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2015). Concepts of plants held by young Brazilian children: An exploratory study. European Journal of Educational Research, 4(3), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu­jer.4.3.105 

Bell, R., Smetana, L., & Binns, I. (2005). Simplifying inquiry instruction. The Science Teacher, 72(7), 30–33. 

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods For The Social Sciences (4th ed.). Pearson. https://doi.org/10.2307/1319429 

Berland, L. K., Schwarz, C. V., Krist, C., Kenyon, L., Lo, A. S., & Reiser, B. J. (2016). Epistemologies in practice: Making scientific practices meaningful for students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(7), 1082–1112. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21257 

Bevins, S., & Price, G. (2016). Reconceptualising inquiry in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 38(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1124300 

Bjorklund, D. F., & Causey, K. B. (2018). Children’s Thinking: Cognitive Development and Individual Differences (6th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc. 

Blake, B., & Pope, T. (2008). Developmental psychology: Incorporating Piaget’s and Vygotsky’s theories in classrooms. Journal of Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives in Education, 1(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315009674 

Blake, J., & Gibson, A. (2021). Critical Friends Group protocols deepen conversations in collaborative action research projects. Educational Action Research, 29(1), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1717568 

Blake, R. (2016). Technology and the four skills. Language Learning and Technology, 20(2), 129–142. 

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806 

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic Analysis: A Practical Guide. SAGE Publications Ltd. 

Buchanan, J., Pressick-Kilborn, K., & Maher, D. (2019). Promoting environmental education for primary school-aged students using digital technologies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/100639 

Bybee, R. W. (2014). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Personal reflections and contemporary implications. Science and Children, 15–18. 

Bybee, R. W. (2015). The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Creating Teachable Moments. National Science Teachers Association Press. 

Bybee, R. W. (2019). Using the BSCS 5E Instructional Model to Introduce STEM Disciplines. Science and Children, 51(2), 8–12. 

Cairns, D., Dickson, M., & McMinn, M. (2021). “Feeling like a scientist”: Factors affecting students’ selections of technology tools in the science classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(6), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-021-09917-0 

Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge, and Action Research. RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495177 

Carvalho, L., & Yeoman, P. (2021). Performativity of materials in learning: The learning-whole in action. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 10(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.7821/NAER.2021.1.627 

Chang, H. Y., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2020). Students’ context-specific epistemic justifications, prior knowledge, engagement, and socioscientific reasoning in a mobile augmented reality learning environment. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 399–408. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09825-9 

Chen, J. C., Huang, Y., Lin, K. Y., Chang, Y. S., Lin, H. C., Lin, C. Y., & Hsiao, H. S. (2020). Developing a hands-on activity using virtual reality to help students learn by doing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(1), 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12389 

Ching, C. C., & Hagood, D. (2019). Activity monitor gaming and the Next Generation Science Standards: Students engaging with data, measurement limitations, and personal relevance. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(6), 589– 601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09789-5 

Choi, A., Seung, E., & Kim, D. E. (2021). Science teachers’ views of argument in scientific inquiry and argument-based science instruction. Research in Science Education, 51, 251–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9861-9 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2017). Research Methods in Education (5th ed.). RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315456539 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education (8th ed.). Routledge. 

Comeau, P., Hargiss, C. L. M., Norland, J. E., Wallace, A., & Bormann, A. (2019). Analysis of children’s drawings to gain insight into plant blindness. Natural Sciences Education, 48(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2019.05.0009 

Contant, T. L., Bass, J. E., Tweed, A. A., & Carin, A. A. (2018). Teaching Science Through Inquiry-Based Instruction (13th ed.). Pearson. 

Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (1993). Through the lens of a critical friend. Educational Leadership, 51(2), 49–51. 

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd. 

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc. 

Dabholkar, S., Irgens, G. A., Horn, M., & Wilensky, U. (2020). Students’ epistemic connections between science inquiry practices and disciplinary ideas in a computational science unit. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, 2, 1141–1148. 

de Jong, T., Gillet, D., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Hovardas, T., Dikke, D., Doran, R., Dziabenko, O., Koslowsky, J., Korventausta, M., Law, E., Pedaste, M., Tasiopoulou, E., Vidal, G., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2021). Understanding teacher design practices for digital inquiry–based science learning: the case of Go-Lab. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 417–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09904-z 

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-017-1319-x 

Department for Education United Kingdom. (2013). Science Programmes Of Study: Key Stage 1 And 2 National Curriculum In England. Department for Education United Kingdom. 

Desouza, J. M. S. (2017). Conceptual play and science inquiry: using the 5E instructional model. Pedagogies, 12(4), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2017.1373651 

Dewey, J. (1938). Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. Henry Holt and Company. https://doi.org/10.7312/moor90276-010 

Dewey, J. (2015). Experience and Education. Touchstone. 

Dewi, A. K., Slamet, S. Y., Atmojo, I. R. W., & Syawaludin, A. (2022). The influence of interactive digital worksheets based on level of inquiry towards science process skills in elementary school. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi, 13(1), 251–258. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.27 

Dewi, P. S., Widodo, A., Rochintaniawati, D., & Prima, E. C. (2021). Web-based inquiry in science learning: Bibliometric analysis. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(2), 191–203. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v4i2.9576 

Díaz, P., Ioannou, A., Bhagat, K. K., & Spector, J. M. (2019). Learning in a Digital World: Perspective on Interactive Technologies for Formal and Informal Education. Springer. 

DiBiase, W., & McDonald, J. R. (2015). Science teacher attitudes toward inquiry-based teaching and learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 88(2), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2014.987717 

Dixon, B. (2019). Experiments in experience: Towards an alignment of research through design and John Dewey’s pragmatism. Design Issues, 35(2), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00531 

Efron, S. E., & Ravid, R. (2013). Action Research in Education: A Practical Guide. The Guilford Press. 

Engeness, I. (2020). Teacher facilitating of group learning in science with digital technology and insights into students’ agency in learning to learn. Research in Science and Technological Education, 38(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2019.1576604 

Falloon, G. (2017). Mobile devices and apps as scaffolds to science learning in the primary classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(6), 613– 628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9702-4 

Feille, K. K. (2021). Advancing preservice teacher’s science pedagogy beyond the classroom. School Science and Mathematics, 121(4), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12463 

Feldman, A., Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2018). Teachers Investigate Their Work: An Introduction to Action Research Across the Professions (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315398822 

France, A. (2021). Teachers using dialogue to support science learning in the primary classroom. Research in Science Education, 51(3), 845–859. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09863-3 

Fusaro, M., & Smith, M. C. (2018). Preschoolers’ inquisitiveness and science-relevant problem solving. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 42(March 2017), 119– 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.09.002 

Garrison, J. (2010). Dewey and Eros: Wisdom and Desire in the Art of Teaching. IAP. 

Gatt, S., Tunnicliffe, S. D., Borg, K., & Lautier, K. (2007). Young Maltese children’s ideas about plants. Journal of Biological Education, 41(3), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2007.9656080 

Gilbert, J. (2016). Transforming science education for the anthropocene: Is it possible? Research in Science Education, 46(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165­015-9498-2 

Gillies, R. M. (2020). Inquiry-Based Science Education. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429299179 

Gillies, R. M., & Rafter, M. (2020). Using visual, embodied, and language representations to teach the 5E instructional model of inquiry science. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102951 

Godden, N. J. (2017). The Pprticipation imperative in co-operative inquiry: Personal reflections of an initiating researcher. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 30(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-016-9387-2 

Gomez-Arizaga, M. P., Kadir Bahar, A., June Maker, C., Zimmerman, R., & Pease, R. (2016). How does science learning occur in the classroom? Students’ perceptions of science instruction during the implementation of the REAPS model. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 431–455. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1209a 

Goodnough, K. (2011). Taking Action in Science Classrooms Through Collaborative Action Research: A Guide for Educators. Sense Publishers. 

Grangeat, M., Harrison, C., & Dolin, J. (2021). Exploring assessment in STEM inquiry learning classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 43(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1903617 

Gunawan, Harjono, A., Hermansyah, & Herayanti, L. (2019). Guided inquiry model through virtual laboratory to enhance students’ science process skills on heat concept. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345 

Gunstone, R. (2015). Encyclopedia of Science Education. Springer Reference. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0 

Gutierez, S. B. (2021). Teacher’s dialogic prompts that scaffold students’ participation in classroom argumentation: A case of a biology teacher. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 36(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.21315/apjee2021.36.1.4 

Halim, L., Ramli, M., & Mohamad Nasri, N. (2018). Cultural influences in inquiry-based science learning (IBSL) practices : Malaysia and Indonesia context. The 1st PGSD International Conference on Education, 1, 1–8. 

Harlen, W., & Qualter, A. (2018). The Teaching of Science in Primary Schools (7th ed.). Routledge. 

Harris, C. J., & Rooks, D. L. (2010). Managing inquiry-based science: Challenges in enacting complex science instruction in elementary and middle school classrooms. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9172-5 

Hasin, I., & M Nasir, M. K. (2021). The effectiveness of the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in rural secondary schools in Malaysia. Journal of Education and E-Learning Research, 8(1), 59–64. https://doi.org/10.20448/JOURNAL.509.2021.81.59.64 

Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2015). The Action Research Dissertation: A Guide for Students and Faculty (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc. 

Herring, M. C., Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2016). Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315771328 

Hockenbury, S. E., Nolan, S. A., & Hockenbury, D. H. (2016). Discovering Psychology (7th ed.). Worth Publishers. 

Holmes, N. G., Wieman, C. E., & Bonn, D. A. (2015). Teaching critical thinking. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(36), 11199–11204. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1505329112 

Hong, J. C., Hwang, M. Y., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2017). An exploration of students’ science learning interest related to their cognitive anxiety, cognitive load, self-confidence and learning progress using inquiry-based learning with an iPad. Research in Science Education, 47(6), 1193–1212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9541-y 

Huda, M., Maseleno, A., Shahrill, M., Jasmi, K. A., Mustari, I., & Basiron, B. (2017). Exploring adaptive teaching competencies in big data era. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 12(3), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v12i03.6434 

Hurwitz, L. B., & Schmitt, K. L. (2020). Can children benefit from early internet exposure? Short-and long-term links between internet use, digital skill, and academic performance. Computers and Education, 146(October 2019), 103750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103750 

Ianes, D., & Venturoso, L. (2021). Learn by distance: Advice for choosing an effective and inclusive e-Learning platform. Open Journal of IUL University, 2(3), 172– 184. 

James, F., & Augustin, D. S. (2018). Improving teachers’ pedagogical and instructional practice through action research: potential and problems. Educational Action Research, 26(2), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1332655 

Jefferson, R. N. (2014). Action research: Theory and applications. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 20(2), 91–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2014.921536 

Jimoyiannis, A. (2010). Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Computers and Education, 55(3), 1259–1269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022 

Jin, Q., & Kim, M. (2021). Supporting elementary students’ scientific argumentation with argument-focused metacognitive scaffolds (AMS). International Journal of Science Education, 43(12), 1984–2006. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1947542 

Johnston, K. (2019). Digital technology as a tool to support children and educators as co-learners. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(4), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619871571 

Joseph, I. K., Cecilia, N., & Anthonia, U. N. (2017). Development of science process skills among Nigerian secondary school science students and pupils : An opinion. International Journal of Chemistry Education, 1(2), 13–21. www.premierpublishers.org.issn:2169­3342%0Ahttps://premierpublishers.org/ijce/300620179012.pdf 

Kadioglu-Akbulut, C., Cetin-Dindar, A., Acar-Sesen, B., & Küçük, S. (2023). Predicting Preservice Science Teachers’ TPACK through ICT usage. Education and Information Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11657-0 

Kamarudin, M. Z., Mat Noor, M. S. A., & Omar, R. (2022). A scoping review of the effects of a technology- integrated, inquiry-based approach on primary pupils’ learning in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2138847 

Kapici, H. O., & Akcay, H. (2020). Improving student teachers’ TPACK self-efficacy through lesson planning practice in the virtual platform. Educational Studies, 00(00), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1835610 

Karampelas, K. (2019). Cross curricular science in elementary schools in Greece -The curriculum factor. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 18(7), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.18.7.2 

Keahey, J. (2021). Sustainable development and participatory action research: A systematic review. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 34(3), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-020-09535-8 

Kemmis, S. (2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790903093284 

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The Action Research Planner Doing Critical Participatory Action Research. Springer Science+Business Media. 

Kessler, A., & Phillips, M. (2019). What do published abstracts reveal about the TPACK research community? Let us tell you! Society for Information Technology & Teacher …, 1–2. 

Khalaf, B. K., & Zin, Z. B. M. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a 

Koh, J. H. L., & Kan, R. Y. P. (2021). Students’ use of learning management systems and desired e-learning experiences: Are they ready for next generation digital learning environments? Higher Education Research and Development, 40(5), 995–1010. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1799949 

Kontra, C., Lyons, D. J., Fischer, S. M., & Beilock, S. L. (2015). Physical experience enhances science learning. Psychological Science, 26(6), 737–749. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615569355 

Kousloglou, M., Petridou, E., Molohidis, A., & Hatzikraniotis, E. (2023). Assessing students’ awareness of 4Cs skills after mobile-technology-supported inquiry-based learning. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15086725 

Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16, 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020­00635-4 

Krishan, I. Q., & Al-Rsa’I, M. S. (2023). The effect of technology-oriented differentiated instruction on motivation to learn science. International Journal of Instruction, 16(1), 961–982. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16153a 

Kühnis, J., & Fahrni, D. (2021). Forgotten nature? Experiences with and knowledge of nature among schoolchildren: A pilot study in Central Switzerland. Journal of Elementary Education, 14(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18690/rei.14.1.1-10.2021 

Kumar Basak, S., Wotto, M., & Bélanger, P. (2018). E-learning, M-learning and D-learning: Conceptual definition and comparative analysis. E-Learning and Digital Media, 15(4), 191–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753018785180 

Lather, P. (1986). Research as praxis. Harvard Educational Review, 56(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.56.3.bj2h231877069482 

Laverty, M. J. (2016). Thinking my way back to you: John Dewey on the communication and formation of concepts. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(10), 1029–1045. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2016.1185001 

Lin, X. F., Tang, D., Lin, X., Liang, Z. M., & Tsai, C. C. (2019). An exploration of primary school students’ perceived learning practices and associated self-efficacies regarding mobile-assisted seamless science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 41(18), 2675–2695. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1693081 

Livermore, A. H. (1964). The process approach of the AAAS commission on science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(4), 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020403 

Maeng, J. L., Mulvey, B. K., Smetana, L. K., & Bell, R. L. (2013). Preservice teachers’ TPACK: Using technology to support inquiry instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(6), 838–857. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013­9434-z 

Mahmud, S. N. D., Nasri, N. M., Samsudin, M. A., & Halim, L. (2018). Science teacher education in Malaysia: Challenges and way forward. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-018-0026-3 

Marco-Bujosa, L. M., & Levy, A. J. (2016). Caught in the balance: An organizational analysis of science teaching in schools with elementary science specialists. Science Education, 100(6), 983–1008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21239 

Mariegaard, S., Seidelin, L. D., & Bruun, J. (2022). Identification of positions in literature using thematic network analysis: The case of early childhood inquiry-based science education. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2022.2035351 

Marsh, J. (2016). The digital literacy skills and competences of children of pre-school age. Media Education, 7(2), 197–214. https://doi.org/10.14605/MED721603 

Mat Noor, M. S. A. (2021). Annual Report 2021. Malaysian Action Research Network. https://www.marnet.my/annual-report-2021 

Mat Noor, M. S. A., & Shafee, A. (2021). The role of critical friends in action research: A framework for design and implementation. Practitioner Research, 3(July), 1– 33. https://doi.org/10.32890/pr2021.3.1 

Matuk, C., Wanjing Anya, M., Sharma, G., & Linn, M. C. (2019). The lifespan and impact of students’ ideas shared during classroom science inquiry. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Conference, CSCL, 1, 49–56. 

McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856 

McLaughlin, C. A., & MacFadden, B. J. (2014). At the elbows of scientists: Shaping science teachers’ conceptions and enactment of inquiry-based instruction. Research in Science Education, 44(6), 927–947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165­014-9408-z 

McNew-Birren, J., & van den Kieboom, L. A. (2017). Exploring the development of core teaching practices in the context of inquiry-based science instruction: An interpretive case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 74–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.001 

McNiff, J. (2017). Action Research All You Need to Know. SAGE Publications Ltd. 

Meerah, T. S. M., & Osman, K. (2013). What is “action” in action research: A Malaysian exposure. Asian Social Science, 9(16), 148–153. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v9n16p148 

Mehto, V., Kangas, K. K., Hakkarainen, K. P. J., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, S. P. (2019). The roles of material prototyping in collaborative design process at an elementary school. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 24(2), 141–162. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/888709e4-b4f8­4f6c-9e4f-5556b04351f4 

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass. 

Mertler, C. A. (2019). The Wiley Handbook of Action Research in Education. Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119399490 

Mills, G. E., & Gay, L. R. (2016). Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications (11th ed.). Pearson Education Limited. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 -2025 (Preschool to Post-Secondary Education). Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2015). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Sains Tahun 1 Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (Edisi Bahasa Inggeris) [The Standards-Based Curriculum for Primary Schools Science Year 1 Curriculum and Assesment Standards Document (English Edition)]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016a). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah (Semakan 2017) [Standards-Based Curriculum for Malaysian Primary Schools Explanatory Book (2017 Revision)]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016b). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Sains Tahun 2 Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (Edisi Bahasa Inggeris) [The Standards-Based Curriculum for Primary Schools Science Year 2 Curriculum and Assesment Standards Document (English Edition)]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2016c). Panduan Pelaksanaan Pengajaran Pembelajaran Berasaskan Inkuiri [Inquiry-Based Learning Teaching Implementation Guide]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2017). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Sains Tahun 3 Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (Edisi Bahasa Inggeris) [The Standards-Based Curriculum for Primary Schools Science Year 3 Curriculum and Assesment Standards Document (English Edition)]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018a). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Sains Tahun 4 Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (Edisi Bahasa Inggeris) [The Standards-Based Curriculum for Primary Schools Science Year 4 Curriculum and Assessment Standards Document (English Edition)]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2018b). Panduan Pendekatan Modular Dalam Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran [Guide to Modular Approach in Teaching and Learning]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2019). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Sains Tahun 5 Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (Edisi Bahasa Inggeris) [The Standards-Based Curriculum for Primary Schools Science Year 5 Curriculum and Assesment Standards Document (English Edition)]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2022). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Rendah Sains Tahun 6 Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan Pentaksiran (Edisi Bahasa Inggeris) [The Standards-Based Curriculum for Primary Schools Science Year 6 Curriculum and Assesment Standards Document (English Edition)]. Curriculum Development Division, Ministry of Education Malaysia. 

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. 

Moreira-dos-Santos, F., & El-Hani, C. N. (2017). Belief, knowledge and understanding: How to deal with the relations between different cultural perspectives in classrooms. Science and Education, 26(3–4), 215–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-017-9891-5 

Mouromadhoni, K. R., Atun, S., & Nurohman, S. (2019). Students’ curiosity profile in excretion system topic taught using authentic inquiry learning. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 5(3), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i3.7689 

Muhamad Dah, N., Mat Noor, M. S. A., Kamarudin, M. Z., & Ibrahim, M. M. (2023). Facilitation of student questioning in the Malaysian secondary science classroom using the Investigable Questioning Formulation Technique ( IQFT ) Protocol. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1163/23641177­bja10063 

Mulyeni, T., Jamaris, M., & Suprjyati, Y. (2019). Improving basic science process skills through inquiry-based approach in learning science for early elementary students. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10274a 

Mupira, P., & Ramnarain, U. (2018). The effect of inquiry-based learning on the achievement goal-orientation of grade 10 physical sciences learners at township schools in South Africa. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(6), 810– 825. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21440 

Mustafa, N., Khairani, A. Z., & Ishak, N. A. (2021). Calibration of the science process skills among Malaysian elementary students: A Rasch model analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1344– 1351. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I4.21430 

Nawanidbumrung, W., Samiphak, S., & Inoue, N. (2022). The impact of pre-service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs on teaching science as inquiry: A silent antagonist for effective inquiry-based science lessons. Science Education International, 33(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v33.i1.12 

Nicko Mercado, J. L., & Joy Panganiban, V. M. (2019). Technology integration in teaching science using TPACK among Pre–service science teachers of St. Bridget College Batangas City, Philippines. Ioer International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 1(1), 63–71. www.ioer-imrj.com 

Nicol, C. B. (2021). An overview of inquiry-based science instruction amid challenges. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11350 

Niedermeyer, J. (2018). Making the science classroom a place for wonder. The American Biology Teacher, 80(6), 416–422. 

Niiranen, S. (2021). Supporting the development of students’ technological understanding in craft and technology education via the learning-by-doing approach. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 31(1), 81– 93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-019-09546-0 

Norton, L. (2019). Action Research in Teaching and Learning: A Practical Guide to Conducting Pedagogical Research in Universities (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315147581 

Nugroho, K. Y., & Sakhiyya, Z. (2022). Photovoice: Young children online English language learning, parents’ voices and its implication to educational policy and provision. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 612–622. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.35083 

Oliveira, A., Feyzi Behnagh, R., Ni, L., Mohsinah, A. A., Burgess, K. J., & Guo, L. (2019). Emerging technologies as pedagogical tools for teaching and learning science: A literature review. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 1(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.141 

Ong, E. T., Govindasamy, D., Singh, C. K. S., Ibrahim, M. N., Wahab, N. A., Borhan, 

M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2021). The 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on the learning of electricity among Malaysian students. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.33415 

Ong, E. T., Govindasay, A., Salleh, S. M., Tajuddin, N. M., Rahman, N. A., & Borhan, 

M. T. (2018). 5E inquiry learning model: Its effect on science achievement among Malaysian year 5 indian students. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 8(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i12/5017 

Ong, E. T., Keok, B. L., Yingprayoon, J., Singh, C. K. S., Borhan, M. T., & Tho, S. W. (2020). The effect of 5E inquiry learning model on the science achievement in the learning of “magnet” among year 3 students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i1.21330 

Oon, P. T., Pegrum, M., Stevenson, M., & Benson, S. (2023). Exploring science pedagogy on the web 2.0/mobile border: Teachers’ views of a mobile wiki-based inquiry approach. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(1), em2218. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12820 

Østergaard, L. D. (2016). Inquiry-based learning approach in physical education: Stimulating and engaging students in physical and cognitive learning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 87(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2015.1119076 

Özdeniz, Y., Aktamis, H., & Bildiren, A. (2023). The effect of differentiated science module application on the scientific reasoning and scientific process skills of gifted students in a blended learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2175627 

Patrick, P., & Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2011). What plants and animals do early childhood and primary students’ name? Where do they see them? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 20(5), 630–642. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011­9290-7 

Phang, F. A., Abu, M. S., Ali, M. B., & Salleh, S. (2014). Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan pernyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains [Factors contributing to the decline in student participation in the science stream]. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 63– 71. 

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2000). The Psychology of The Child. Basic Books. 

Qablan, A. M., & DeBaz, T. (2015). Facilitating elementary science teachers’ implementation of inquiry-based science teaching. Teacher Development, 19(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.959552 

Rachmatullah, A., Hinckle, M., & Wiebe, E. N. (2023). The role of teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs and habits in differentiating types of K–12 science teachers. Research in Science Education, 53(2), 337–355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165­022-10060-y 

Ramnarain, U. (2015). Connecting the hands-on to the minds-on: A video case analysis of South African physical sciences lessons for student thinking. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1151–1163. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1391a 

Rocha Fernandes, G. W., Rodrigues, A. M., & Rosa Ferreira, C. A. (2019). Using ICT in Inquiry-based Science Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030­17895-6 

Rochintaniawati, D., Riandi, R., Kestianty, J., Kindy, N., & Rukayadi, Y. (2019). The analysis of biology teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge development in lesson study in West Java Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 201–210. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19303 

Rönnebeck, S., Bernholt, S., & Ropohl, M. (2016). Searching for a common ground – A literature review of empirical research on scientific inquiry activities. Studies in Science Education, 52(2), 161–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351 

Rönnebeck, S., Nielsen, J. A., Olley, C., Ropohl, M., & Stables, K. (2017). The teaching and assessment of inquiry competences. In Transforming Assessment (pp. 27–52). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_2 

Royal Society of Biology. (2019). Biology Changing the World: Royal Society of Biology Strategic Plan 2019-2021. Royal Society of Biology. 

Rutherford, F. J. (1964). The role of inquiry in science teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 2(2), 80–84. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660020204 

Ruzaman, N. K., & Rosli, D. I. (2020). Inquiry-based education: Innovation in participatory inquiry paradigm. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(10), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i10.11460 

Rybska, E., Tunnicliffe, S. D., & Sajkowska, Z. A. (2017). Children’s ideas about the internal structure of trees: cross-age studies. Journal of Biological Education, 51(4), 375–390. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2016.1257500 

Saad, A. (2020). Students’ computational thinking skill through cooperative learning based on hands-on, inquiry-based, and student-centric learning approaches. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 290–296. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080135 

Saleh, A., Yuxin, C., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Glazewski, K. D., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. 

C. (2020). Coordinating scaffolds for collaborative inquiry in a game-based learning environment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1490– 1518. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21656 

Salminen, J., & Annevirta, T. (2016). Curriculum and teachers’ pedagogical thinking when planning for teaching. European Journal of Curriculum Studies, 3(1), 387– 406. 

Sarkar, S., Mohapatra, S., & Sundarakrishnan, J. (2017). Assessing impact of technology based digital equalizer programme on improving student learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 195–213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9434-0 

Schussler, E. E., Link-Pérez, M. A., Weber, K. M., & Dollo, V. H. (2010). Exploring plant and animal content in elementary science textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 44(3), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2010.9656208 

Sheffield, R. S., & McIlvenny, L. (2014). Design and implementation of scientific inquiry using technology in a teacher education program. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(6), 46–60. 

Sholahuddin, A., Yuanita, L., Supardi, Z. A. I., & Prahani, B. K. (2020). Applying the cognitive style-based learning strategy in elementary schools to improve students’ science process skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(2), 289–301. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2020.27 

Siegesmund, A. (2016). Increasing student metacognition and learning through classroom-based learning communities and self-assessment. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 17(2), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v17i2.954 

Sikas, N. (2017). Enhancing Scientific Literacy through Implementation of Inquiry-Based Science Education (IBSE) in Malaysia Science Curriculum. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2). 

Singh, G., Shaikh, R., & Haydock, K. (2019). Understanding student questioning. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(3), 643–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-018-9866-0 

So, W. W. M., Chen, Y., & Wan, Z. H. (2019). Multimedia e-learning and self-regulated science learning: A study of primary school learners’ experiences and perceptions. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(5), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09782-y 

Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2022). The effect of an instructional intervention based on the use of video-worked examples to promote elementary students’ science process skills. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(3), 753–772. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2158 

Song, Y. (2014). “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)” for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Computers and Education, 74, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.005 

Song, Y., & Wen, Y. (2018). Integrating various apps on BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) into seamless inquiry-based learning to enhance primary students’ science learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(2), 165–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-017-9715-z 

Sun, S. (2011). Meta-analysis of Cohen’s kappa. Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology, 11(3–4), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-011­0077-3 

Tan, A. L., Ong, Y. S., Ng, Y. S., & Tan, J. H. J. (2022). STEM problem solving: Inquiry, concepts, and reasoning. Science and Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00310-2 

Tanak, A. (2020). Designing tpack-based course for preparing student teachers to teach science with technological pedagogical content knowledge. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 41(1), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.012 

Tay, A. J., & Saleh, S. (2019). Science teachers’ instructional practices in Malaysian and German secondary schools. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(4), 124. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n4p124 

Tohara, A. J. T., Shuhidan, S. M., Bahry, F. D. S., & Nordin, M. N. (2021). Exploring digital literacy strategies for students with special educational needs in the digital age. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(9), 3345–3358. 

Tsivitanidou, O. E., Gray, P., Rybska, E., Louca, L., & Constantinou, C. P. (2018). Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0 

Tsybulsky, D. (2020). Digital curation for promoting personalized learning: A study of secondary-school science students’ learning experiences. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1728447 

Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2001). Talking about plants -Comments of primary school groups looking at plant exhibits in a botanical garden. Journal of Biological Education, 36(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2001.9655792 

Tunnicliffe, S. D. (2015). Considering the needs & interests of the youngest biologists. American Biology Teacher, 77(9), 645–646. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2015.77.9.1 

Upmeier Zu Belzen, A., Engelschalt, P., & Krüger, D. (2021). Modeling as scientific reasoning—the role of abductive reasoning for modeling competence. Education Sciences, 11(9), 9–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090495 

van Riesen, S. A. N., Gijlers, H., Anjewierden, A., & de Jong, T. (2018). The influence of prior knowledge on experiment design guidance in a science inquiry context. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1327–1344. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263 

van Uum, M. S. J., Verhoeff, R. P., & Peeters, M. (2017). Inquiry-based science education: Scaffolding pupils’ self-directed learning in open inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 39(18), 2461–2481. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1388940 

Villanueva, X., Villarroel, J. D., & Antón, A. (2021). Young children’s drawings of plant world: a cohort study analysing pictorial content. Journal of Biological Education, 55(3), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1679656 

Wagh, A., Cook-Whitt, K., & Wilensky, U. (2017). Bridging inquiry-based science and constructionism: Exploring the alignment between students tinkering with code of computational models and goals of inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 615–641. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21379 

Walid, A., Winarni, E. W., & Yanti, F. A. (2023). Argumentation skill assessment for diagnosing students’ understanding of factual, conceptual, procedural, and metacognitive knowledge: Characteristics of initial needs. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i1.40108 

Wang, C., Ma, Y., & Wu, F. (2020). Comparative learning performance and mental involvement in collaborative inquiry learning: Three modalities of using virtual lever manipulative. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(5), 587– 596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09838-4 

Waters-Adams, S. (1994). Collaboration and Action Research: A cautionary tale. Educational Action Research, 2(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965079940020205 

Wei, Z., Luo, Z., Sang, P., & Du, J. (2022). Application of fuzzy AHP in the evaluation of students’ cognitive ability. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 32(6), 730–747. 

Wiemer, M. (2019). Learning through research: Independent learning. Self-Learning processes and self-learning abilities in inquiry-based learning. In Inquiry-Based Learning – Undergraduate Research (pp. 29–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14223-0_3 

Williams, P. J., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2017). Teacher and student reflections on ICT-rich science inquiry. Research in Science and Technological Education, 35(1), 88–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2016.1248928 

Wu, J., Guo, R., Wang, Z., & Zeng, R. (2021). Integrating spherical video-based virtual reality into elementary school students’ scientific inquiry instruction: Effects on their problem-solving performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(3), 496–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1587469 

Yan, Z., Brown, G. T. L., Lee, J. C. K., & Qiu, X. L. (2020). Student self-assessment: why do they do it? Educational Psychology, 40(4), 509–532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038 

Zainudin, S., Halim, L., & Ikhsan, Z. (2015). How 60 : 40 policy affect the development of science curriculum in Malaysia. Proceeding: 7th International Seminar on Regional Education, November 5-7, 2015, 3, 1396–1405. 

Zaman, Z., & Khawaja, U. A. (2022). Deviation from recommended curriculum and efforts to bridge the gap between suggested and taught curricula. Propel Journal of Academic Research, 2(1), 26–36. https://doi.org/10.55464/pjar.v2i1.28 

Zhang, L. (2019). “Hands-on” plus “inquiry”? Effects of withholding answers coupled with physical manipulations on students’ learning of energy-related science concepts. Learning and Instruction, 60(January), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.001 

Zheng, Y., Yu, S., Zhang, M., Wang, J., Yang, X., Zheng, S., & Ping, X. (2022). Research on performance assessment of students’ inquiry skills in China’s elementary schools: a video analysis of Beijing discovering science around us. Research in Science and Technological Education, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2126973 

Zhou, J. (2012). Problems teachers face when doing action research and finding possible solutions. Chinese Education and Society, 45(4), 68–80. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932450405 

Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383–399. 

Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers and Education, 94, 1–17.