An integrated framework of online learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning

Mohamad Rohieszan Ramdan

QR Code Link :
Type :	Article
Subject :	L Education (General)
ISBN :	2165-8714
Main Author :	Mohamad Rohieszan Ramdan
Additional Authors :	Khoo Yin Yin Dayang Rafidah Syariff M. Fuad Azita Yonus @ Ahmad Suzyanty Mohd Shokory
Title :	An integrated framework of online learning effectiveness in institutions of higher learning
Hits :	108

Place of Production :	Tanjung Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pengurusan & Ekonomi
Year of Publication :	2024
Notes :	European Journal of Educational Research
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
HTTP Link :	Click to view web link
PDF Full Text :	You have no permission to view this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

In the early stages of adopting online learning, both learners and teachers displayed resistance, but the COVID-19 pandemic has forced a widespread shift to digital learning. To facilitate this transition, there is a growing focus on highlighting the effectiveness of online learning, which directly impacts learning outcomes. This study investigates online learning effectiveness through an integrated framework that considers online assessment practices and online course design as independent variables, with online learning support as a moderating variable. Understanding the effectiveness of online learning is crucial as hybrid learning becomes the "new norm" in education, combining online and offline methods for teaching the digital generation. Using a quantitative research design involving 232 students at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, the study found that online assessment practices and course design significantly influence students perceived learning outcomes in an online learning environment. Additionally, online learning support positively moderates this relationship. These findings offer a comprehensive perspective on how online assessment practices, course design, and support systems contribute to the quality of higher education in Malaysia amidst evolving educational practices. © 2024 The Author(s).

References

Abd Aziz, N. A., Ramdan, M. R., Nik Hussin, N. S., Abdul Aziz, Z., Osman, J., & Hasbollah, H. R. (2021). The determinants of global expansion: A study on food and beverage franchisors in Malaysia. Sustainability, 13(18), Article 10328. http://doi.org/10.3390/su131810328.

Abduh, M. Y. M. (2021). Full-time online assessment during COVID-19 lockdown: EFL teachers’ perceptions. Asian EFL Journal, 28(11), 26-46. https://bit.ly/49RHP6p.

Adam, S., Fuzi, N. M., Ramdan, M. R., Isa, R. M., Ismail, A. F. M. F., Hashim, M. Y., Ong, S. Y. Y., & Ramlee, S. I. F. (2022). Entrepreneurial orientation and organizational performance of online business in Malaysia: The mediating role of the knowledge management process. Sustainability, 14(9), Article 5081. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095081.

Akimov, A., & Malin, M. (2020). When old becomes new: a case study of oral examination as an online assessment tool. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(8), 1205-1221. https://doi.org/gpxhsd.

Alavi, M., Marakas, G. M., & Yoo, Y. (2002). A comparative study of distributed learning environments on learning outcomes. Information Systems Research, 13(4), 404-415. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.13.4.404.72.

Ali, L., & Al Dmour, N. A. H. H. (2021). The shift to online assessment due to COVID-19: An empirical study of university students, behaviour and performance, in the region of UAE. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11(5), 220-228. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2021.11.5.1515.

Al Mamun, M. A., Lawrie, G., & Wright, T. (2020). Instructional design of scaffolded online learning modules for self-directed and inquiry-based learning environments. Computers and Education, 144, Article 103695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103695.

Baldwin, S. J. (2019). Assimilation in online course design. American Journal of Distance Education, 33(3), 195-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2019.1610304.

Bates, T. (2018). The 2017 national survey of online learning in Canadian post-secondary education: methodology and results. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, Article 29. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0112-3.

Benson, A. D. (2003). Dimensions of quality in online degree programs. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(3), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1703_2.

Carr‐Chellman, A., & Duchastel, P. (2000). The ideal online course. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(3), 229-241. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00154.

Carvalho, P. F., McLaughlin, E. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2022). Varied practice testing is associated with better learning outcomes in self-regulated online learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(8), 1723-1742. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000754.

Chee, M., Davidian, Z., & Weaver, K. D. (2022). More to do than can ever be done: Reconciling library online learning objects with WCAG 2.1 standards for accessibility. Journal of Web Librarianship, 16(2), 87-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2022.2062521.

Chung, E., Subramaniam, G., & Christ Dass, L. (2020). Online learning readiness among university students in Malaysia amidst Covid-19. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 45-58. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v16i2.10294.

Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning by viewing versus learning by doing: Evidence‐based guidelines for principled learning environments. Performance Improvement, 47(9), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.20028.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587.

Cook, D. A., & Steinert, Y. (2013). Online learning for faculty development: a review of the literature. Medical Teacher, 35(11), 930-937. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2013.827328.

Council of Adult and Experiential Learning. (2000). Serving adult learners in higher education: Principles of effectiveness (Executive Summary). CiteSeerX. http://surl.li/sxucu.

Eom, S. B., Wen, H. J., & Ashill, N. (2016). The determinants of students’ perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2006.00114.x.

Ferrer, J., Ringer, A., Saville, K., Parris, M. A., & Kashi, K. (2022). Students’ motivation and engagement in higher education: The importance of attitude to online learning. Higher Education, 83, 317-338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00657-5.

Fredericksen, E., Picket, A., Pelz, W., Swan, K., & Shea, P. (2000). Student satisfaction and perceived learning with on-line courses: principles and examples from the SUNY learning network. On-line education: Learning effectiveness and faculty satisfaction, 4(2), 7-41. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v4i2.1899.

Gaytan, J., & McEwen, B. C. (2007). Effective online instructional and assessment strategies. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 117-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640701341653.

Gillis, A., & Krull, L. M. (2020). COVID-19 Remote learning transition in Spring 2020: Class structures, student perceptions, and inequality in college courses. Teaching Sociology, 48(4), 283-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X20954263.

Grishchenko, N. (2020). The gap not only closes: Resistance and reverse shifts in the digital divide in Russia. Telecommunications Policy, 44(8), Article 102004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102004.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (7th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to search page