|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| Teaching reading in English to young six-year-old non-native speakers of English requires a specific approach. Children at this age are best taught to read from the smallest unit of sounds and continue to learn how these sounds are associated with the letters of the alphabets before they embarked into reading words. However, some scholars argue that approaches in teaching young children to read should differ between genders. Gender factor has been widely deliberated in the domain of reading in English among children. This paper addresses the issue of teaching the soundletter association among 6-year-old preschool children. Specifically, it will focus on the gender factor in learning the sound-letter association and blending of those sounds via the use of the synthetic phonics method of reading instruction. We will discuss the method of instruction used in this study and provide evidence based on the findings of a pre and post-test. Our findings indicate that there were no gender differences of the lower level skill specifically in the sound-letter association. The findings suggest that both male and female preschool children learned at the same rate using the synthetic phonics method of instructions. We argue that though gender is considered as one of the contributing factors in successful reading in English, for example at the comprehension or vocabulary level, it is however not a fundamental factor with the lower level skills specifically, in learning the sound and letter association and blending these sounds. In other words, children’s success in associating sounds and letters, and in blending sounds in English does not differ in terms of their gender. |
| References |
1. Baker, D. L., Park, Y., & Baker, S. K. (2010). The reading performance of English learners in grades 1–3: the role of initial status and growth on reading fluency in Spanish and English. Reading and Writing, 25(1), 251–281. doi:10.1007/s11145-010-9261-z. 2. Below, J. L., Skinner, C. H., Fearrington, J. Y., & Sorrell, C. A. (2010). Gender differences in early literacy: Analysis of kindergarten through fifth-grade Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills Probes. School Psychology Review, 39(2), 240–257. 3. Berglund, E. V. A., Eriksson, M., & Westerlund, M. (2005). Development and aging communicative skills in relation to gender , birth order , childcare and socioeconomic status in 18-month-old children. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(6), 485–491. 4. Bouchamma, Y., Poulin, V., & Ruel, C. (2014). Impact of reading strategy use on girls’ and boys’ achievement. Reading Psychology, 35(4), 312–331. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.724043 5. Chatterji, M. (2006). Reading achievement gaps, correlates, and moderators of early reading achievement: Evidence from the Early Childhood Longitudinal Study (ECLS) kindergarten to first grade sample. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 489–507. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.489. 6. Chia, N. K. H., & Kee, N. K. N. (2013). Gender differences in the reading process of six-year-olds in Singapore. Early Child Development and Care, 183(10), 1432–1448. doi:10.1080/03004430.2013.788812. 7. DiLorenzo, K. E., Rody, C. a., Bucholz, J. L., & Brady, M. P. (2011). Teaching letter–sound connections with picture memonics: Itchy’s alphabet and early decoding. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(1), 28–34. doi:10.1080/10459880903286763. 8. Dodd, B., & Carr, A. (2003). Young children’s letter-sound knowledge. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 34(2), 128–137. 9. Dooner, J. (2012). The magic and mystery of learning to read: A practical approach to implementing phonics in the classroom. Practically Primary, 17(1), 31-33. 10. Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2011). Dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS) next assessment manual. Eugene, OR.: Dynamic Measurement Group. 11. Harn, B. a, Stoolmiller, M., & Chard, D. J. (2008). Measuring the dimensions of alphabetic principle on the reading development of first graders: the role of automaticity and unitization. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 143–57. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354934. 12. Johnston, R. S., McGeown, S., & Watson, J. E. (2011). Long-term effects of synthetic versus analytic phonics teaching on the reading and spelling ability of 10 year old boys and girls. Reading and Writing, 25(6), 1365–1384. doi:10.1007/s11145-011-9323-x. 13. Johnston, R., & Watson, J. (2005). The effects of synthetic phonics teaching on reading and spelling attainment : A seven year longitudinal study. Retrieved from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/36496/0023582.pdf. 14. Kame’enui, E. J., Simmons, D. C., & Coyne, M. D. (2000). Schools as host environments: toward a schoolwide reading improvement model. Annals of Dyslexia, 50(1), 31–51. doi:10.1007/s11881-000-0016-4. 15. Locke, A., Ginsborg, J., & Peers, I. (2002). Development and disadvantage: Implications for the early years and beyond. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 37(1), 3–15. doi:10.1080/1368282011008991. 16. Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199–214. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2008.01389.x. 17. Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2010). Investigating gender differences in reading. Educational Review, 62(2), 175–187. doi:10.1080/00131911003637006. 18. Morgan, P. L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children’s reading skills and reading motivation. Exceptional Children, 73(2), 165–183. 19. National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implication for reading instruction. Betthesda, MD: National Inst. of Child, Health and Human Development (NIH). 20. Nik Nawi, N. E., & Ahamad, O. (2001). ReadEasy phonics reading series: Beginner level. Kuala Lumpur: ReadNetwork. 21. Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS Survival manual (4th ed.). Berkshire: McGraw Hill. 22. Westerlund, M., & Lagerberg, D. (2008). Expressive vocabulary in 18-month-old children in relation to demographic factors, mother and child characteristics, communication style and shared reading. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34(2), 257–66. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2214.2007.00801.x. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |