Developing engagement and agency through project work

Che Musa Normazidah, Azman Hazita, Koo Yew Lie,

Abstract

Research into student writing has shown the central role of writing in promoting language acquisition. Written language is seen as a discourse practice that students must gradually learn in their academic endeavour. Writing in a second or foreign language however poses problems to students whose proficiency in the language is still developing. This article reports the result of a qualitative study that examines how participation in content-based project work helps students’ learning. The study is informed by the central premise that views language and literacy learning as situated practices in specific classroom contexts and are acquired as students engage with the subject matter and in specific learning tasks (Zamel & Spack, 2006). Data were collected using focus group interviews, classroom observation and document analysis. Findings of the study indicate that talk around the written text is multilingual and that content-related project work serves as a tool to promote engagement and agency among multilingual learners.

References

1.Adzmi, N. A., Bidin, S., Ibrahim, S., & Jusoff, K. (2009). The Academic English language needs of Industrial Design students in UiTM Kedah, Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 171–178. 2. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R., (Eds). (2000). Situated literacies: Reading and writing in context. New York: Routledge. 3. Baynham, M., & Prinsloo, M. (2009). Introduction: The future of literacy studies. In M. Baynham, & M. Prinsloo, (Eds.), The future of literacy studies (pp. 1- 20). Great Britain: Palgrave Macmillan. 4. Damber, U. (2012). Equity and models of literacy in a diverse world. Issues in Educational Research. Special issue in intercultural and critical education, 22(1), 36–46. 5. Freebody, P. & Luke, A. (2003). ‘Literacy as engaging with new forms of life: The Four roles model’ In: G. Bull and M. Anstey (Eds.), The literacy lexicon (2nd ed.) (pp. 51-66). NSW: Pearson Education Australia. Ismail, N., Darus, S., and Hussin, S. (2012). ESL Tertiary Students’ writing needs: A framework for a supplementary online writing program. AJTLHE, 4(2), 61–78. 6. Ivanic, R., Edwards, R., Barton, D., Martin-Jones, M., Fowler, Z., & Hughes, B. (2009). Improving learning in college: Rethinking literacies across the curriculum. Oxon: Routledge. 7. Koo, Y. L. (2008). Language, culture and literacy: Meaning-making in global contexts. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 8. Leki, I. (2007). Undergraduates in a second language: Challenges and complexities of academic literacy development. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum. 9. Leki, I., Cumming, A., & Silva, T. (2008). A synthesis of research on second language writing in English New York: Routledge. 10. Morita, N. (2009). Language, culture, gender and academic socialization. Language and Education, 23(5), 443-460. 11. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 12. Street, B. V. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy in development, ethnography and education. New York: Longman Group Limited. Street, B., & Lefstein, A. (2007). Literacy: An advanced resource book. Oxon: Routledge. 13. Spack, R. (1988). Initiating ESL students into Academic Discourse Community: How far should we go ? TESOL Quarterly, 22(1), 29–51. 14. Wahi, W. (2012). English language academic literacies for employability of Malaysian undergraduate students. PhD Thesis. Faculty of Education. The University of Western Australia. 15. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. 16. Zamel, V., & Spack, R. (2006). Teaching multilingual Learners across the curriculum: Beyond the ESOL classroom and back again. Journal of Basic Writing, 25(2), 126-152.