UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| In the context of local polytechnics, developing skillful English lecturers is a critical effort. Driven by the demand to produce highly desired graduates for industries, they require supports to stay developed and realise the demand of those industries. Yet, the offered in-service trainings (INSET) of the current system very lightly focus on their real needs. Hence, this study aims to identify the types of INSET that are exactly required by polytechnic English lecturers. A survey was delegated to a random sampling throughout Malaysia to get the related information. An SPSS procedure was run to generate the results. The findings of this exploratory survey are expected to benefit related stakeholders to prepare and offer more relevant courses to English lecturers in the future. |
| References |
1. Ahmad Yasruddin Md Yassin, Wan Mohd Haniff Wan Mohd Shaupil, Affidah Mardziah Mukhtar, Noor Izma Ab Ghani, & Farawaheeda Rashid. (2010). The English proficiency of civil engineering Students at a Malaysian polytechnic. Asian Social Science, 6(6), 161–170. Available at: www.ccsenet.org/ass. 2. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.007. 3. Aziah Ismail, Najdah Baharom & Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah. (2014). Professional learning community practices in high and low performing schools in Malaysia. International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review. 2(9), 159-164. Available at www.ijcrar.com/vol-2-9/Aziah%20Ismail,%20et%20al.pdf. 4. Bailey, K. M., Curtis, A., & Nunan, D. (2001). Pursuing professional development: The self as source. Canada: Heinle and Heinle. 5. Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching Research, 36(2), 81–109. Available at: http://journals.cambridge.org/production/action/cjoGetFulltext?fulltextid=151138. 6. Borg, S. (2006). The distinctive characteristics of foreign language teachers. Language Teaching Research, 10(1), pp.3–31. Available at: http://ltr.sagepub.com/cgi/doi/10.1191/1362168806lr182oa. 7. Craft, A. (2000). Continuing professional development: a practical guide for teachers and schools (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer. 8. Harlini K. (2011). An evaluation of the English for specific purposes curriculum in a Malaysian polytechnic. Unpublished master thesis. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. 9. Hayes, D. (1995). In-service teacher development: some basic principles. ELT Journal, 49(3), 252–261. Available at: http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org/content/49/3/252.short. 10. Higgins, S. & Leat, D. (2001). Horses for courses or courses for horses: What is effective teacher development? In A. Craft & H. Burgess (Eds.). Teacher Development: Exploring our own practice (pp. 57–68). London: Paul Chapman Publishing. 11. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik. (2009). Hala tuju transformasi politeknik: Ke arah kelestarian penghasilan modal insan negara. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik. 12. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2010). Laporan eksekutif kajian pengesanan graduan politeknik 2010. Politeknik mentransformasi kehidupan. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik. 13. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik. Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2011). Fakta ringkas (Quick Facts) September 2011. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik. 14. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2012) Laporan eksekutif kajian pengesanan graduan politeknik 2012. Politeknik menyumbang kepada tenaga kerja TVET negara. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik. 15. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik, Kementerian Pengajian Tinggi Malaysia. (2014). Laporan eksekutif kajian pengesanan graduan politeknik 2014. Graduan berkualiti memenuhi permintaan industri. Jabatan Pengajian Politeknik. 16. Kabilan, M. K., Adlina, W. F. W., & Embi, M. A. (2011). Online collaboration of English language teachers for meaningful professional development experiences. English Teaching, 10(4), 94-115. 17. Kabilan, M. K., & Veratharaju, K. (2013). Professional development needs of primary school English-language teachers in Malaysia. Professional Development in Education, 39(3), 330-351. 18. Khairun Nisah S. & Sandrasagran, A. (2010). Peer observation as a means of promoting lecturers’ professional development. PSP’s Research Digest, pp.60–71. 19. Lyne, M. J. H. (2013). Effect of teacher mentoring programme in Malaysia on improving teachers’ self-efficacy. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 9(11), 1-18. 20. M.K. Yuen. (2015, November 15). Poor English a major handicap. The Star. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2015/11/15/poor-english-a-major-handicap-its-not-just-young-doctorsworkers- in-various-sectors-too-have-a-weak/. 21. Marwan, A. (2009). ESP teaching challenges in an Indonesian vocational higher institution. The English Teacher, 38, 1–12. 22. Mohd Khalid, U. (2012). A study on Seberang Perai Polytechnic Lecturers’ perception on the integration of Digital Language Lab in English Language Lesson. Unpublished master thesis. Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia. 23. Nambiar, R. M., & Thang, S. M. (2016). Examining Malaysian teachers’ online blogs for reflective practices: towards teacher professional development. Language and Education, 30(1), 43-57. 24. Opfer, V. D. & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualising teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. 25. Ramakrishnan, K. & Norizan, M. Y. (2012). Employment issues among Malaysian information and communication technology (ICT) graduates: A case study. African Journal of Business Management, 6(16): 5615–5621. 26. Richards, J. C. (2008). Second language teacher education today. RELC Journal, 39(2),158–177. 27. Richards, J.C. (2011). Competence and performance in language teaching. Cambridge University Press: USA. 28. Richards, J.C. & Farrell, T.S.C. (2005). Professional development for language teachers-strategies for teacher learning, New Jersey: Cambridge University Press. 29. Richards, J.C. & Lockhart, C. (1996). Reflective language teaching in second language Classrooms, New York: Cambridge University Press. 30. Sahul Hameed A.W., Mohd Amin Z., & Mohd Ali J. (2010). Transformational of Malaysian polytechnic into university college in 2015: Issues and challenges for Malaysian technical and vocational education. 1st UPI International Conference on TVET . Bandung. 31. Shulman, L.S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22. 32. Subramaniam, G. K. J. & Raja Nor Safinas, R. H. (2013). The ability of the polytechnics marketing student in using good English oral communication skills during industrial training. English for Specific Purposes World, 14(39): 1–15. 33. Suhaily A. & Faizah A. M. (2013a). Reflection on language teaching practice in polytechnic: Identifying sources of teachers’ beliefs. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, pp.813–822. 34. Suhaily A. & Faizah A. M. (2013b). English language teaching challenges in Malaysia: Polytechnic lecturers’ experience. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28(4), 540–547. 35. Suhaily A. & Faizah A. M. (2016). A tale of English polytechnic lecturers’ decision making. Dinamika Ilmu 16 (1), 1-13. 36. Wallace, M. J. (1991). Training foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 37. Zaliza, H. & N. Mohd Safarin (2014). Unemployment among Malaysia graduates: Graduates’ attributes, lecturers’ competency and quality of education. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112: pp. 1056 – 1063. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |