UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : |
There has been an increase in the students’ enrolment to the private schools across Malaysia. The shift in the parents’ preference on the selection of secondary school has been predominantly attributed to the dissatisfaction with the current school education system. Subsequently, this study attempts to study the factors that affect parents’ preferences in selecting the secondary school for their children. Four factors namely school characteristics, school environment, social influences and the parents-administration-teachers (PAT) relationship that are related to school choice were examined in this study. 203 representative elements were drawn using judgmental sampling technique and structural equation modelling (SEM) analysis was used to analyse the data collected. The findings showed that all factors significantly affect the parents’ preferences in selecting the secondary school for their children. Comparatively, the effect of school environment on the parents’ preferences was found slightly lower than social influences, school characteristics, and PAT relationship. This study accordingly puts forward several implications for both academics and practitioners alongside recommendations for future researchers. |
References |
1. Adams, K. S., & Christenson, S. L. (2000). Trust and the family–school relationship examination of parent–teacher differences in elementary and secondary grades. Journal of School Psychology, 38(5), 477-497. 2. Adebayo, F. A. (2009). Parents’ Preference for Private Secondary Schools in Nigeria. International Journal of Education Science, 1(1), 1-6. 3. Ahmad, K., & Cohen, J. E. (2014). Secondary school’s primary importance. Retrieved 23 August, 2016, from https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/secondary-education-developing-countries-by-kamal-ahmad-2014-12. 4. Alves, F., Elacqua, G., Koslinki, M., Martinez, M., Santos, H., & Urbina, D. (2015). Winners and losers of school choice: Evidence from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Santiago, Chile. International Journal of Educational Development, 41, 25-34. 5. Avery, C., & Hoxby, C. M. (2004). Do and should financial aid packages affect students’ college choices? In C. M. Hoxby (Ed.) College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it. (pp. 239-301). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 6. Badri, M. A., & Mohaidat, J. (2014). Antecedents of parent-based school reputation and loyalty: an international application. International Journal of Educational Management, 28(6), 635-654. doi: 10.1108/IJEM-06-2013-0098. 7. Beamish, P., & Morey, P. (2013). School Choice: What Parents Choose,. TEACH Journal of Christian Education, 7(1), 26-33. 8. Bedrick, J. (2013). New study explains how and why parents choose private schools, 2016, from http://www.cato.org/blog/new-study-explains-how-why-parents-choose-private-schools. 9. Bernal, P., Mittag, N., & Qureshi, J. A. (2016). Bernal, P., Mittag, N., & Qureshi, J. A. (2016). Estimating effects of school quality using multiple proxies. . Labour Economics, 39, 1-10. 10. Boselovic, J. L. (2015). Education and the Public Sphere in New Orleans, 1803–2005: Conflicts over Public Education, Racial Inequality, and Social Status in Pre-Katrina New Orleans. In L. Mirón, B. R. Beabout & J. L. Boselovic (Eds.), Only in New Orleans-School Choice and Equity Post-Hurricane Katrina (pp. 17-35). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. 11. Bosetti, L. (2004). Determinants of school choice: Understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 387-405. 12. Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2009). What parents want: school preferences and school choice. Bristol: CMPO. 13. Burgess, S., Greaves, E., Vignoles, A., & Wilson, D. (2009). Parental choice of primary school in England: what ‘type’ of school do parents choose? (Working Paper Series No. 09/224). Retrieved from: www.bristol.ac.uk/cmpo/publications/papers/2009/wp224.pdf . 14. Chowa, G. A. N., Masa, R. D., Ramos, Y., & Ansong, D. (2015). How do student and school characteristics influence youth academic achievement in Ghana? A hierarchical linear modeling of Ghana YouthSave baseline data. International Journal of Educational Development, 45, 129-140. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.09.009. 15. Chumacero, R. A., Gómez, D., & Paredes, R. D. (2011). I would walk 500 miles (if it paid): Vouchers and school choice in Chile. Economics of Education Review, 30(5), 1103-1114. 16. Dewan, D. (2011). Importance of secondary education. Retrieved 1 July, 2016, from http://www.educationtimes.com/index.aspx?page=article&secid=69&conid=20110527201105261724151152cdcfbdb. 17. Duggan, M., Lenhart, A., Lampe, C., & Ellison, N. B. (2015). Parents and Social Media. Retrieved 23 August, 2016, from http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/07/16/parents-and-social-media/ . 18. Forster, G. (2016). A win-win solution – The empirical evidence on school choice Retrieved from http://www.edchoice.org/research/win-win-solution/. 19. Furukawa, D. T. (2011). College Choice Influences Among High-Achieving Students: An Exploratory Case Study of College Freshmen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada, 2011. Retrieved from: http://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2092&context=thesesdissertations. 20. Gouda, J., Chandra Das, K., Goli, S., & Maikho Apollo Pou, L. (2013). Government versus private primary schools in India: An assessment of physical infrastructure, schooling costs and performance. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 33(11/12), 708-724. 21. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C. J., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. 22. Hajirnis, A. (2015). Social media networking: Parent guidance required. The Brown University Child and Adolescent Behavior Letter, 31(12), 5-6. 23. Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K. S. (1987). Studying College Choice: A Three-Phase Model and the Implication for Policy Makers. College and University, 62, 207-221. 24. Hsu, Y., & Yuan-fang, C. (2013). An Analysis of Factors Affecting Parents’ Choice of a Junior High School. . International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, 3(2), 39-49. 25. Hughes, J., & Kwok, O. M. (2007). Influence of student-teacher and parent-teacher relationships on lower achieving readers' engagement and achievement in the primary grades. Journal of educational psychology, 99(1), 39-51. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.1.39. 26. James, Z., & Woodhead, M. (2014). Choosing and changing schools in India’s private and government sectors: Young Lives evidence from Andhra Pradesh. Oxford Review of Education, 40(1), 73-90. 27. Karila, K., & Alasuutari, M. (2012). Drawing partnership on paper: How do the forms for individual educational plans frame parent-teacher relationship. International Journal about Parents in Education, 6(1), 15-27. 28. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025. 29. Kotler, P., & Armstrong, C. (2014). Principles of marketing (14th ed.). England: Pearson Education Limited. 30. Kuuskorpi, M., Kaarina, Finland, & González, N. C. (2011). The future of the physical learning environment: school facilities that support the user Retrieved 23 August, 2016, from https://www.oecd.org/edu/innovation education/centreforeffectivelearningenvironmentscele/49167890.pdf. 31. Ladhari, R., & Michaud, M. (2015). eWOM effects on hotel booking intentions, attitudes, trust, and website perceptions. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 46, 36-45. 32. Lawrence, E. & Mollborn, S. (2013). Parents shaping children’s education: School selection in the United States. (Working Paper No. POP2013-03). Retrieved from: Sociology and Institute of Behavioral Science, University of Colorado Boulder website: http://www.colorado.edu/ibs/pubs/pop/pop2013-0003.pdf. 33. López, O. S. (2010). The Digital Learning Classroom: Improving English Language Learners’ academic success in mathematics and reading using interactive whiteboard technology. Computers & Education, 54(2010), 901-915. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.019. 34. Merkley, D., Schmidt, D., Dirksen, C., & Fuhler, C. (2006). Enhancing parent-teacher communication using technology: A reading improvement clinic example. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 6(1), 11-42. 35. Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied Multivariate Research: Design and Interpretation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc. 36. Miretzky, D. (2004). The communication requirements of democratic schools: Parent-teacher perspectives on their relationships. . Teachers College Record, 106(4), 814-851. 37. Muhriz, T. A. A., A., & Wan-Jan, W. S. (2011). Choice, competition and the role of private providers in the Malaysian school system. Retrieved from http://www.cfbt.com.my/file/MalaysiaFINAL_web.pdf . 38. Nuraihan, M. I., Mariana, M. O., & Syahriah, B. (2014, 4-5 January 2014 ). Public School Development and Planning: Parents’ criteria of selecting public school in Gombak District. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences Paper presented at the AicQoL2014 Kota Kinabalu AMER International Conference on Quality of Life, The Pacific Sutera Hotel, Sutera Harbour, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia. 39. Poikolainen, J. (2012). A case study of parents' school choice strategies in a Finnish urban context. European Educational Research Journal, 11(1), 127-144. 40. Pride, W. M., Ferrell, O. C., Lukas, B., Schembri, S., & Niininen, O. (2015). Marketing principles (2nd ed.). Sdyney: Cengage Learning Australia. 41. Prothero, A. (2015). When Choice Doesn’t Feel Like a Choice Retrieved 23 August 2016, from http://neworleans.edweek.org/parents-struggle-with-school-choice-system/. 42. Quintana, R. (2013). How social media influence people – infographic. Retrieved 23 August, 2016, from http://www.socialmagnets.net/how-social-media-influences-people/. 43. Sheridan, S. M., Glover, T. A., Bovaird, J. A., Garbacz, S. A., Witte, A., & Kwon, K. (2012). A randomized trial examining the effects of conjoint behavioral consultation and the mediating role of the parent-teacher relationship. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 23-46. 44. Skallerud, K. (2011). School reputation and its relation to parents' satisfaction and loyalty. International Journal of Educational Management, 25(7), 671-686. 45. Tang, T. L.-P., & Austin, M. J. (2009). Students’ perceptions of teaching technologies, application of technologies, and academic performance. Computers & Education, 53(2009), 1241–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.06.007. 46. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, & National Forum on Education Statistics. (2003). Planning Guide for Maintaining School Facilities. Washington, DC. 47. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2011). Global Education digest 2011 – Comparing education statistics across the world. Canada: UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 48. Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2007). Reputation beyond the rankings: A conceptual framework for business school research. . Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 278-304. 49. Whitsel, C. (2014). Parental Choices in the Primary and Secondary School Market in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. European Education, 46(2), 53-73. 50. Wilson, T. S. (2015). Exploring the Moral Complexity of School Choice: Philosophical Frameworks and Contributions. Studies Philosophy and Education, 34, 181-191 doi: 10.1007/s11217-014-9417-4. 51. Wirtz, J., Chew, P., & Lovelock, C. (2012). Essentials of services marketing (2nd ed.). Singapore: Pearson Education South Asia Pte Ltd. 52. Yaacob, N. A., Osman, M. M., & Bachok, S. (2014a). Factors influencing parents’ decision in choosing private schools. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 242-253. 53. Yaacob, N. A., Osman, M. M., & Bachok, S. (2014b). An assessment of factors influencing parents’ decision making when choosing a private school for their children: a case study of Selangor, Malaysia: for sustainable human capital. Paper presented at the The 5th Sustainable Future for Human Security (SustaiN 2014). |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |