UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :GV Recreation Leisure
ISSN :2232-1926
Main Author :- Tomoliyus, - Sumaryanti, - Herka Maya Jatmika,
Title :Development of validity and reliability of net game performance-based assessment on elementary students’ achievement in physical education
Place of Production :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :2016

Abstract :
The purpose of this study was to seek the validity and reliability of net game’s performance-based assessment on the context of elementary school physical education students’ achievement. Research and development used as a primary research method. The subject were forty students in Yogyakarta’s table tennis school club which chose through random sampling technique. Content Validity Ratio (CVR) is used to test the validity, on the other hand, Anava-general Multifacet model for the inter-rater reliability. the results were as follows: CVR of the decision making is 0.714; CVR of the skill acquisition process is 1; CVR of the skill acquisition product is 1; and CVR of the returning on beginning position is 0.714. as for the decision making inter-rater reliability r = 0.785; skill acquisition process reliability r = 0.872; skill acquisition product r = 0.785; and returning on beginning position r = 0.885. As the conclusion, performance-based assessment instrument of net game, particularly table tennis, has high scores of validity and inter-rater reliability.

References

1. Azwar, S. (2012). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. 2. Griffin, L. L., Oslin, J., & Mitchell, S. (2007). Teaching sport concepts and skill. A tactical game approach. Champaign, II: Human Kineties. 3. Grehaigne, J. F., Richard J. F., & Griffin, L. L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sport and games. London: Routledge. 4. Husaini Usman, & R. Purnomo Setiady Akbar. (2003). Pengantar statistik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. 5. Lund, J. L., & Kirk, M. F. (2010). Performance-based assessment for Middleand Highschool physical education. USA: Human Kinetics. 6. Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2008). The game performance assessment instrument (GPAI): Some concerns and solutions for further development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27: 220-240. 7. Mueller, John. (2009). Authentic assessment toolbox. North Central C ollege http://www.noctrl.ed/Naperville, http://jonathan.mueller.fakulty.noctrl.edu/toolbox/index.htm (Diambil 27 Agustus 2009). 8. Nitko, A, J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assesment of students (6th Ed). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc. 9. Suzann Schiemer. (2000). Assessment strategies elementary physical education. USA: Human kinetics. 10. Sugiyono. (2006). Metode penelitian pendidikan, pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Penerbit Alfabeta. 11. Sukadji, Soetarlinah. (2000). Menyusun dan mengevaluasi laporan penelitian. Jakarta: UI-Press. 12. Shultz, K. S., & Whitney, D. J. (2005). Measurement theory in action: Case studies and exercises. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc. 13. Performance-based assessment instrument developed for the net game, particularly table tennis have been tested with high value content validity and reliability. It can be concluded that the performance-based instrument for table tennis is a valid and reliable instrument in measure elementary student acquisition on the table tennis.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.