Vocabulary levels test and word associates test : can they measure language proficiency? (IR)

Enayat Mostafa Janebi, Reza Amirian Seyed Mohammad,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :	2232-1926
Main Author :	Enayat Mostafa Janebi, Reza Amirian Seyed Mohammad,
Title :	Vocabulary levels test and word associates test : can they measure language proficiency? (IR)

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2016
PDF Full Text :	Login required to access this item.

Abstract :

The present study investigates whether it may be possible to use Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT) and Word Associates Test (WAT) for measuring language proficiency and placement purposes. In so doing, 85 upper-intermediate and 50 lower-intermediate EFL learners took Vocabulary Levels Test (VLT), Word Associates Test (WAT), and Oxford Placement Test (OPT). Results of correlation and regression analyses indicated that (a) Word Associates Test could not predict performance on Oxford Placement Test neither for the lower-intermediate nor the upper-intermediate group, (b) Vocabulary Levels Test could significantly predict performance on Oxford Placement Test for both proficiency groups, and (c) while the 2,000 word level correlated with and predicted performance on Oxford Placement Test for the lower-intermediate group, the 5,000 word level predicted performance on proficiency test for the upper-intermediate group. The findings point to the possibility of using VLT for measuring language proficiency and placement purposes. The results have implications for test developers, teachers, and researchers to use VLT as a placement test since it’s easy to administer and score.

References

1. Akbarian, I. (2010). The relationship between vocabulary size and depth for ESP/EAP learners. System, 38(3), 391- 401. 2. Baba, K. (2009). Aspects of lexical proficiency in writing summaries in a foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18(3), 191-208. 3. Batty, A.O. (2007). Vocabulary depth in written and oral assessment. In K. Brandford-Watts (Ed.), JALT 2006 Conference Proceedings (pp. 1100-1108). Tokyo: JALT. 4. Beglar, D., & Hunt, A. (1999). Revising and validating the 2000 word level and university word level vocabulary tests. Language Testing, 16(2), 131-162. 5. Bogaards, P., & Laufer, B. (2004). Vocabulary in a Second Language. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 6. Coady, J., Magoto, J., Hubbard, P., Graney, J., & Mokhtari, K. (1993). High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers. In Huckin, T., Hynes, M., & Coady, J. (Eds.), Second Language Reading and Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 217-226). Ablex, Norwood, NJ. 7. Engber, C.A. (1995). The relationship of lexical proficiency to the quality of ESL compositions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(2), 139-155. 8. Geranpayeh, A. (2003). A quick review of the English Quick Placement Test. UCLES Research Notes, 12, 8-10. 9. Henriksen, B. (1999). Three Dimensions of Vocabulary Development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(2), 303-317. 10. Ishii, T., & Schmitt, N. (2009). Developing an integrated diagnostic test of vocabulary size and depth. RELC Journal, 40(1), 5-22. 11. Kaivanpanah, S., & Zandi, H. (2009). The role of depth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension in EFL context. Journal of Applied Sciences, 9(4), 698-706. 12. Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54(3), 399-436. 13. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1995). Vocabulary size and use: lexical richness in L2 writing production. Applied Linguistics, 16(3), 307-322. 14. Laufer, B., & Nation, P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33-51. 15. Laufer, B., Elder, C., Hill, K., & Congdon, P. (2004). Size and strength: do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? Language Testing, 21(2), 202-226. 16. Lee, S.H. (2003). ESL learners’ vocabulary use in writing and the effects of explicit vocabulary instruction. System 31(4), 537-561. 17. Mehrpour, S., & Rahimi, M. (2010). The impact of general and specific vocabulary knowledge on reading and listening comprehension: A case of Iranian EFL learners. System, 38(2), 292-300. 18. Nassaji, H. (2004). The Relationship between Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge and L2 Learners’ Lexical Inferencing Strategy Use and Success. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 61(1), 107-134. 19. Nassaji, H. (2006). The Relationship between Depth of Vocabulary Knowledge and L2 Learners’ Lexical Inferencing Strategy Use and Success. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (3), 387-401. 20. Nation, P. (1983). Testing and teaching vocabulary. Guidelines, 5(1), 12-25. 21. Nation, P. (1993). Using dictionaries to estimate vocabulary size: essential, but rarely followed, procedures. Language Testing, 10(1), 27-40. 22. Qian, D.D. (1998). Depth of vocabulary knowledge: assessing its role in adult’s reading comprehension in English as a second language. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. 23. Qian, D.D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282-307. 24. Qian, D.D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: an assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513-536. 25. Read, J. & Chapelle, C.A. (2001). A framework for second language vocabulary assessment. Language Testing, 18(1), 1-32. 26. Read, J. (1993). The development of a new measure of L2 vocabulary knowledge. Language Testing, 10(3), 355-371. 27. Read, J. (2000). Assessing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 28. Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In Bogaards,P., & Laufer, B. (Eds.), Vocabulary in a Second Language (pp. 209-227). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company. 29. Read, J. (2007). Second language vocabulary assessment: Current practices and new directions. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 105-125. 30. Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12(3), 329-363. 31. Schmitt, N., Ching Ng, J.W., & Garras, J. (2011). The Word Associates Format: Validation evidence. Language Testing, 28(1), 105-126. 32. Schmitt, N., Schmitt, D., & Clapham, C. (2001). Developing and exploring the behaviour of two new versions of the Vocabulary Levels Test. Language Testing, 18(1), 55-88. 33. Schoonen, R. & Verhallen, M. (1998). Aspects of vocabulary knowledge and reading performance. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego. 34. Schoonen, R. & Verhallen, M. (2008). The assessment of deep word knowledge in young first and second language learners. Language Testing, 25 (2), 211-236. 35. Shen, Z. (2008). The Roles of Depth and Breadth of Vocabulary Knowledge in EFL Reading Performance. Asian Social Science, 4 (12), 135-137. 36. Shiotsu, T., & Weir, C.J. (2007). The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance. Language Testing, 24(1), 99-128. 37. University of Cambridge: ESOL Examinations (2004). Quick Placement Test (Version 1). Oxford University Press. 38. Wolter, B. (2002). Assessing proficiency through word associations: is there still hope? System, 30(3), 315-329. 39. Xing, P., & Fulcher, G. (2007). Reliability assessment for two versions of Vocabulary Levels Tests. System, 35(2), 182-191. 40. Zhang, L.J., & Anual, S.B. (2008). The Role of Vocabulary in Reading Comprehension: The Case of Secondary School Students Learning English in Singapore. RELC Journal, 39(1), 51-76.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page