UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|The present study was conducted mainly to investigate the applicability of children’s conception space presented in Piaget’s Cognitive Development theory to Sri Lankan children. The study attempted to identify whether there were variations in Sri Lankan children’s conception of space according to the sectors i.e. urban, rural and estate, they live in, factors affecting Sri Lankan children’s conception of space. The methodology of the study was quantitative and in nature. Piagetian tests modified to suit the Sri Lankan context and the case study method was used in achieving the objectives of the study. The sample of the study consisted of 75 children selected randomly from primary school children between the ages of 5-10 years from Urban, Rural and Estate sectors in the Kalutara district of the Western Province. Modified Piagetian instruments, Observation schedules and in-depth interview schedules were used as instruments for data collection. The findings of the study indicated children’s conception of space the findings revealed that Piaget’s theory is applicable to Sri Lankan children in relation to haptic perception, projection of shadows of the rectangle but other tasks vary age wise and stage-wise. The results of the performance of Sri Lankan children spatial tasks, the study found that that there were no prominent variations in the performance in all three tasks. But the estate children’s performance is slightly higher than that of other children in a few age ranges.|
1. Carlson, J. S. (1973). Cross-cultural piagetian studies: What can they tell ushttp://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED086346.pdf . [last accessed on 9.1.2016]. 2. Chen, W. and Menglan, Z. (1983). A developmental study of conservation concepts with five- to ten-yearold children. Chinese Education & Society, 16(2 – 3), pp.101-123. 3. Damon, W. and Lerner, R. M. (2006). Handbook of psychology. Volume one: Theroetical models of human development. New York: John Wiley & Sons. 4. Dasen, P.R. (1972). Cross-cultural piagetian research, As cited in A.E. Maynard. (2008). What we thought we knew and how we came to know it: Four decades of cross-cultural research from a piagetian point of view. Human Development, 51, pp.56–65. 5. Lutz, S. and Huitt, W. (2004). Connecting cognitive development and constructivism: Implications from theory for instruction and assessment. Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 9(1), pp. 67-90. 6. Mays, W. (1972). Translator’s introduction. In J. Piaget The principles of genetic epistemology (W. Mays, Trans). NY: Basic Books), pp. 1-9. 7. McLeod, S. A. (2008). Information processing. processing.html [last accessed on 9.3.2016]. National Institute for Early Education Research. (2002). Preschool policy matters. http://nieer.org/resources/policybriefs/1.pdf [last accessed on 27.11.2011]. 8. Oakley, L. (2004). Cognitive development. New York: Routledge. 9. Piaget,J. and Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. Translated by F.J.Langton, J.L.Lunzer. London : Routledge & Kegn Paul. (Original work published in 1948). 10. Piaget,J. and Inhelder, B. (1962). Commentary on Vygotsky's criticisms. New Ideas in Psychology, 13, pp. 325-365. 11. Piaget,J. and Inhelder, B. (1968). Genetic epistemology. (New York: Columbia University Press). 12. Piaget,J. and Inhelder, B. (1970). Science of education and the psychology of the child. (New York: Viking) pp. 45-67. 13. Piaget,J. and Inhelder, B. (1981). Intelligence and affectivity their relationship during child development. Trans&Ed TA Brown & CE Kaegi. Annual Reviews. 14. Piaget,J. and Inhelder, B. (1997). Moral judgment of the child. New York: Simon and Schuster Inc. 15. Piaget, J.and Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. Translated by F.J. Langton, J.L. Lunzer. London, England: Routledge & Kegn Paul. (Original work published in 1948). 16. Ramos, J. L. (2011). Introduction to Jean Piaget’s theory of cognitive development. http://www.educationspace360.com/index.php/introduction-to-jean-piagets-theory-ofcognitive- development-6-5632 . [last accessed on 20.4.2012]. 17. Santrock, J.W. (2001). Educational psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
|This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.|
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.