Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among EFL high school students in China

Li Yang, Tam Shu Sim,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools
ISSN :	2289-8689
Main Author :	Li Yang, Tam Shu Sim,
Title :	Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among EFL high school students in China

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2017

Full Text :

The teaching of English in China is increasingly focussing on reading (Bao, 2006) and in recent research, metacognitive aspect of reading strategies has been gaining interest in the field of L2 reading (Zhang & Wu, 2009). This study investigates Chinese EFL high school students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and its relationship with students’ actual reading performance. 118 Chinese high school students were involved in the study. Data were collected through the Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) and one internal school-based reading exam. One bivariate regression test and one multiple regression test through SPSS were applied to examine the relationship between metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and students’ actual reading performance. The results revealed that the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies as measured by SORS was positively associated with students’ actual reading performance. Further individual factor analysis showed that Global strategy was a significant predictor of reading performance. This study proved the significant role of metacognitive awareness of reading strategies in EFL high school students’ reading performance

References

1. Bai, X. J. (2014). A study on the correlation between non-English majors' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and their reading comprehension ability. (Unpublished Master dissertation): Southwest Petroleum University. 2. Bao, T. R. (2006). 当前我国中小学英语教学的十大误区。 [Ten misinterpretations of English education in elementary and middle school in China]. Foreign Language Teaching & Research in Basic Education, 2, 24-27. 3. Ediger, M. (2001). Teaching children literacy skills in a second language (3rd ed.). In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 153-169). Boston, MA Heinle & Heinle. 4. Cohen, A.D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. London: Longman. 5. Dabarera, C., Renandya, W. A., & Zhang, L. J. (2014). The impact of metacognitive scaffolding and monitoring on reading comprehension. SYSTEM, 42, 462-473. 6. Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-69. 7. Goh, C., & Hu, G. W. (2014). Exploring the relationship between metacognitive awareness and listening performance with questionnaire data. Language Awareness, 23(3), 255-274. 8. Hou, Y. J. (2013). Metacognitive awareness of reading strategies and multiple intelligences in prediction of English reading comprehension with medical junior college students. International Journal of Arts & Sciences, 6(4), 9-20. 9. Huang, C. X. (2004). Investigation and study on non-English major's metacognitive awareness and foreign language reading. (Master), Northwest Normal University. 10. Livingston, J. A. (1997). Metacognition: An overview. Retrieved August 2015 from http://gse.buffalo.edu/fas/shuell/CEP564/Metacog.htm 11. Malcolm, D. (2009). Reading strategy awareness of Arabic-speaking medical students studying in English. SYSTEM, 37(4), 640-651. 12. Matsumoto, K. (1993). Verbal-report data and introspective methods in second language research: State of the art. RELC Journal, 24(1), 32-60. 13. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259. 14. Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2-10. 15. Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning SILL. SYSTEM, 23(1), 1-23. 16. Paris, S. G. (2002). When is metacognition helpful, debilitating, or benign? In P. Chambers, M. Izaute & P. Marescaux (Eds.), Metacognition: Process, function and use (pp. 105-121). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic. 17. Shang, G. Y., & Zhang, D. (2015). Empirical study on college students' English reading difficulties. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science), 17, 643-649. 18. Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and nonnative readers. SYSTEM, 29(4), 431-449. 19. Vandergrift, L., Goh, C. C. M., Mareschal, C., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2006). The metacognitive awareness listening questionnaire (MALQ): Development and validation. Language Learning, 56(3), 431-462. 20. Veenman, M. V. J., Van Hout-Wolters, B. H. A. M., & Afflerbach, P. (2006). Metacognition and learning: conceptual and methodological considerations. Metacognition Learning, 1, 3-14. 21. Zhang, L. J. (2002). Exploring EFL reading as a metacognitive experience: reader awareness and reading performance. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 12, 69-94. 22. Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students’ metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37-59.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page