River morphometry analysis and its capacity to introduce tourism attraction in Sedim River, Kedah

Abdul Rahman Roselan, Rindam Main,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	GE Environmental Sciences
ISSN :	2289-4470
Main Author :	Abdul Rahman Roselan, Rindam Main,
Title :	River morphometry analysis and its capacity to introduce tourism attraction in Sedim River, Kedah

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2017

Full Text :

The stream has a variety of functions and each of it can be known through morphometric analysis. Morphometric analysis comprised three aspects, namely linear, aerial and relief. The studies carried out at Sungai Jemerli in subbasin of Sungai Sedim Kulim, Kedah is a study to fill the knowledge gap in the field of stream hydro-geomorphology in Malaysia. ArcGIS 10.2.2 was used as assistant tool in this study and morphometry analysis give emphasis to the parameters such as the stream order, stream length, mean stream length (Lsm), stream length ratio (RL), bifurcation ratio (Rb), drainage density (Dd), drainage frequency (Fs), texture ratio (T), form factor (Rf), circularity ratio (RC), maximum basin length (Lg), constant of channel maintenance (C), relief ratio (Rh), and ruggedness number (RN). Computable measurement of the earth’s surface geometry was carried out which aims to explain the drainage characteristic of the Sungai Jemerli, in addition to analysis the morphometry of Sungai Jemerli by using ArcGIS and give information on sub-basin morphometry parameter data. The results showed that the sub-basin of Sedim River is the river basin with low sedimentation rate, simple drainage density, rugged terrain, simple gradient of 3° and mark the formation of the stream at the early stage, as well as the fine texture of the stream. This finding could help in further study on the behaviour of hydrology at the Sungai Jemerli and its significance to the prospects of hydro-tourism in the area of Sungai Sedim, Kedah.

References

1. Akar, I. (2009). How geographical information systems and remote sensing are used to determine morphometrically features of the drainage network of Kastro (Kasatura) Bay hydrological basin. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 30(7), 1737-1748. 2. Aminuddin, B. Y., Wan Abdullah, W. Y., Cheah, U. B., Ghulam, M. H., Zukefli, M. & Salama, R. B. (2001). Impact of highland agriculture on the ecosystem. Journal of Tropical Agriculture and Food Science, 29(1), 69–76. 3. Arpita Pankaj. (2009). GIS-based morphometric analysis of five major sub-watersheds of Song River, Dehradun District, Uttarakhand. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37(1), 157–166. 4. Buckley, R.C. (2006). Adventure tourism.CAB International. Wallingford: United Kingdom. 5. Christopher, H. & Poul, C. (2011). The occurrence of obtuse junction angles and changes in channel width below tributaries along the Mekong River, south‐east Asia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 36(12), 1563-1576. 6. Cigher, M. (2012). Hydro-tourism related to rivers network from Aries basin upstream of Buru. Academica Science Journal, Geographica Series, 1, 31. 7. Fauziah C., Baharudin O., & Azmi Ahmad B. (2011). Making a Living: Pro Poor Tourism in Hot Spring Recreational Park of Sungai Klah, Sungkai, Perak, Malaysia. Jurnal Perspektif, 6(1), 49-59. 8. Gössling S., Peeters P., Hall M.C., Ceron J-P., Dubois G., Lehmann L. V. & Scott D. (2012). Tourism and water use: Supply, demand, and security. An international review. Tourism Management, 33, 1-15. 9. Gregory, K. J. (1966). Dry valleys and the composition of the drainage net. Journal of Hydrology, 4, 327-340. 10. Gregory, K. J. (1968). The composition of the drainage net. Morphometric analysis of maps. Brit. Geom. Res. Group, Occ. Paper, 4, 9-11. 11. Gregory, K. J., & Walling, D. E. (1973). Drainage basins forms and processes: A geomorphological approach. Arnold, London. 12. Gregory, K.J. & Walling, D.E. (1968). The variation of drainage density within a catchment. Hydrological Science Journal, 13(2), 61-68. 13. Horton, R.E. (1932). Drainage basin characteristics. Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 13, 350-361. 14. Horton, R.E. (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage density: hydro physical approach to quantitative geomorphology. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 56, 275-370. 15. Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. (2014). Banci penduduk 2010. Putrajaya; Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. 16. Jabatan Pengairan & Saliran Negeri Kedah. (2015). Muat turun, https: //www. didkedah. gov.my /index.php/perkhidmatan/muat-turun.html 17. Jayakali, D. & Fauziah, C. (2017). Physical carrying capacity for tourism spots in Johor Bahru. Geografi, 5(1), 38-45. Retrieved from https://ejournal.upsi.edu.my/GetFinalFile.ashx?file=b3fde522-eb35-401d-8cc1-baef2dfbc585.pdf. 18. Javed, A., Khanday, Y.M., & Ahmed, R., (2009). Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric and land use analysis using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37, 261–274 19. Miller, V.C., (1953). A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch mountain area. New York: Department of Geology, ONR, Columbia University, Virginia and Tennessee, Proj. NR 389-402, Technical Report 3. 20. Moglen, G. E., Elfatih, A.E & Bras, R. L. (1998). On the sensitivity of drainage density to climate change. Water Resources Research, 34, 855- 862. 21. Morisawa, M., (1968). Streams: their dynamics and morphology. New York: McGraw-Hill. 22. Morisawa, M. (1985). Development of quantitative geomorphology. Geological Society of America, Centennial Special, 1, 79-107. 23. Muhammad Barzani Gasim, Abd. Rahim Samsudin, Wan Nor Azmin Sulaiman & Mohd. Ismail Yaziz. (2005). Perkaitan di antara ciri morfometri dan sifat hidrologi lembangan Sungai Semenyih dan kepentingannya. Geological Society of Malaysia Bulletin, 51, 187-191. 24. Mohd, A. A., Rozalini, R., Rosmiza, M. Z., Abdul, R., Mohd, F., & Novel, L. (2012). The potential of recreational ecotourism attractions at Sungai Klah Hot Springs Recreational Park, Perak. Geografia, 8(7), 125-134. 25. Ngah, M. S. Y. C., Hashim, M., Nayan, N., Saleh, Y., & Mat Said, Z. (2014). Analisis guna tanah dan implikasinya terhadap persekitaran fizikal lembangan Sungai Bernam 1984-2004. Jurnal Perspektif, 6(1), 19-35. 26. Noraini Misnan & Main Rindam, (2012) Morfometri lembangan sungai-sungai utama di Pulau Pinang (Morphometry of major river basins in the Island of Penang). Geografia, 8(3), 71-81. 27. Pidwirny, M. (2006). Stream morphometry. Fundamentals of physical geography, 2nd Edition. Date Viewed. http://www.physicalgeography.net/fundamentals/10ab.html 28. Ramu, Mahalingam, B. & Jayashree, P (2013). Morphometric analysis of Tungabhadra drainage basin. Journal of Engineering, Computers & Applied Sciences, 2, 1-7. 29. Ravikumar, P., Somashekar, R. K., & Angami, M. (2011). Hydrochemistry and evaluation of groundwater suitability for irrigation and drinking purposes in the Markandeya River basin, Belgaum District, Karnataka State, India. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 173(1), 459-487. 30. Scheidegger, A. E. (1965). The algebra of stream-order numbers. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper, 525, 187-189. 31. Schumm, S.A. (1956). The role of creep and rain-wash in the retreat of bad land slopes. American Journal of Science 254, 693–706. 32. Shreve, R.L. (1967). Infinite topologically random networks. Journal of Geology, 75, 178–186. 33. Shu, Y.K. (1989). The geology and mineral resources of the Kuala Kelawang Area, Jelebu, Negeri Sembilan. Geol. Sur. Malaysia District Memoir 20.208 pp. 34. Singh, V. P. & Guo, H. (1997). Parameter estimation for 2-parameter generalized Pateto distribution by (POME), Stoch. Hydrol. Hydraulic. In press. 35. Smith, K.G., (1958). Erosional processes and landforms in Badlands national monument, South Dakota. Geological Society of American Bulletin, 69, 975–1008. 36. Srinivasa Vittala, S., Govindaiah, S., & Honne Gowda, H., (2008). Prioritization of sub-watersheds for sustainable development and management of natural resources: an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and socio-economic data. Current Science, 95, 345–354. 37. Strahler, A.N. (1953). Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Transaction American Geophysics Union 38, 913–920. 38. Strahler, A.N. (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. In V.T. Chow (Ed.), Handbook of Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 439-476. 39. Thakkar, A.K. & Dhiman, S.D., (2007). Morphometric analysis and prioritization of mini watersheds in Mohr watershed, Gujarat, using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 37, 313–321. 40. Waikar, M. L., & Nilawar, A. P. (2014). Morphometric analysis of a drainage basin using geographical information system: A case study. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Research, 2, 179-184. 41. Yang, K., Smith, L. C., Chu, V. W., Pitcher, L. H., Gleason, C. J., Rennermalm, A. K., & Li, M. (2016). Fluvial morphometry of Supraglacial River networks on the southwest Greenland Ice Sheet. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 53(4), 459-482. 42. Yin, E.H. (1989). Geology and mineral resources of the Kuala Lumpur area, Selangor. Memoir Geological Survey Malaysia.. 43. Zernitz, E.R. (1977). Drainage patterns and their significance. In Stanley A. Schumm (ed.) Drainage basin morphology. Dowden: Hutchinson & Ross, pp 45-68.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page