UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
The study was carried out to evaluate the performance of undergraduate students in Test and Measurement Achievement test with samples from probabilistic and non-probabilistic sampling procedures. Three research questions and one hypothesis guided the study. A sample of 200 students (100 from proportionate stratified random representing probabilistic and 100 from purposive representing non-probabilistic). Test and Measurement Achievement test was the instrument used for the study. It has face and content validities. It has a reliability coefficient of 0.79 obtained through Kuder-Richardson formula 20. The data collected with the instrument were analysed in line with the research questions and hypothesis. Mean was used to answer the research questions while Z-test was used to test the hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. The results showed that the undergraduate students who were selected through the probabilistic sampling procedure performed better than sample of students from the non-probabilistic procedure. There was a significant difference between the sample of students from probabilistic and non-probabilistic sampling procedure. Recommendations were made. It was recommended that researchers and evaluators should always use probabilistic or random sampling procedure to carry out their studies for generalisation or judgement. In addition, simple random sampling of balloting or random numbers should always be used and applied when using stratified sampling procedure to select individuals for a study. |
References |
1. Aliyu, R. T. (2015). Development and validation of Mathematics achievement test using Rasch model. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Delta State University, Abraka.
2. Best, J. K & Khan, J. V. (1989). Research in Education. Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice- Hall. Inc.
3. Ekeke, A. U. O. (2016). Environmental factors as correlates of senior secondary school students’ cognitive achievement in Biology in Delta and Edo States. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Delta State University, Abraka.
4. Enwefa, C. (2016). Evaluation of teachers' use of information and communication technology in teaching at Basic Education level in South-South Nigeria. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Delta State University, Abraka.
5. Gronlund, N. E. ( 1985). Measurement and Evaluation in teaching (5th Ed.) New York: Macmillian Publishers.
6. Joe, A. I. (1992). Fundamental statistics for education and behavioural sciences. Ibadan: Kraft Books limited.
7. Nworgu, B. G. (2015). Educational research: Basic issues & methodology (3rd Ed). Nsukka: Universal Trust Publishers.
8. Omole, D. O. K. (2007). Comparative study of students’ performance in school-based assessment and certificate examination at the upper basic education level in FCT. Nigeria Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 7 (1), 50-56.
9. Orubu, M. N. (2016). Junior secondary certificate examination scores in Mathematics and Integrated Sciences as predictors of senior secondary school students’ performance in science. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Delta State University.
10. Osadebe, P. U. (2009). Evaluation of students’ academic performance in senior secondary schools with counselling services. African Journal of Education and Developmental Studies, 6(1), 142-150.
11. Osadebe, P. U. (2013). Evaluation of human capital development in Delta State. African Journal of Social Sciences, 3(3), 186-193.
12. Osadebe, P. U. (2014). Evaluation of achievement of Universal Basic Education (UBE) in Delta State. Education, 134(3), 419-424.
13. Osadebe, P. U. (2015). Comparative analysis of senior secondary school students' performance with school-based assessment scores of continuous assessment and promotion examination in Delta State. International Journal of Education, 7(1), 154-164.
14. Osadebe, P. U. (2016). Evaluation Models: A Seminar Paper presented at Delta State University, Abraka.
15. Owen, F., & Jones, R. (1994). Statistics. London: Longman Group UK limited.
16. Popham, J. W. (1975). Educational evaluation. New Jersey: Pretence Hall Inc.
17. Spiegel, M. R., Schiller, J., & Srinivasan, R. A. (2009). Schaum’s outline of probability and statistics. US: Mc Graw-Hill Companies. Inc.
18. Ukwuije, R. P. I. & Orluwene, G. W. (2012). Peanuts educational statistics. PortHarcourt: Chadik Printing Press.
19. Wikipedia (2015). Sampling (statistics). Retrieve on 15/5/2016 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/sampling (statistics).
20. Worthen, B. R., & Sanders, J. R. (1987). Educational evaluation. New York: Longman Publishers. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |