1. Aborisade, P. A. (2013). Blended learning in English for Academic Purposes courses : A Nigerian case study. In B. Tomlinson & C. Whittaker (Eds.), Blended Learning in English Language Teaching: Course Design and Implementation (pp. 35–42). London, UK: British Council. 2. Archambault, L., Wetzel, K., Foulger, T. S., & Kim Williams, M. (2010). Professional Development 2.0: Transforming Teacher Education Padagogy with 21 Century Tools. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(February 2015), 4–11. http://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2010.10784651 3. Aronson, E., & Patnoe, S. (2011). Cooperation in the Classroom: The Jigsaw Method (3rd ed.). London: Pinter & Martin, Ltd. 4. Asselin, M., & Moayeri, M. (2011). The Participatory Classroom : Web 2.0 in the Classroom. Literacy Learning: The Middle Years, 19(2), i–vii. 5. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y. A., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social …, 58(1), 33–48. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1540-4560.00247/full 6. Béres, I., Magyar, T., & Turcsányi-szabó, M. (2012). Towards a Personalised , Learning Style Based Collaborative Blended Learning Model with Individual Assessment. Informatics in Education, 11(1), 1–28. 7. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), 28–27. 8. Bishop, G. D., & Doiron, G. (2003). Using Online Forums as a Replacement for Face-to-Face Discussion Groups. In Proceedings of the FASS—CDTL Symposium: Grounded Experiences in University Teaching and Learning. (pp. 36–43). Singapore: Centre for Development of Teaching and Learning. 9. Borders, B. (2009). A Brief History of Social Media. 10. Burhanna, K. J., Seeholzer, J., & Salem Jr., J. (2009). No Natives Here: A Focus Group Study of Student Perceptions of Web 2.0 and the Academic Library. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35(6), 523–532. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2009.08.003 11. Cash, J. C., Lee, D. E., & Frass, L. R. (2010). Web 2.0: Using Internet Resources To Increase Student Achievement Among High School Students In Rural Schools. Journal of Information Systems Technology & Planning, 3(6), 73–80. 12. Chang, C., Shu, K., Liang, C., Tseng, J., & Hsu, Y. (2014). Is Blended e-Learning as Measured by an Achievement Test and Self-Assessment Better than Traditional Classroom Learning for Vocational High School Students ? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(2), 213–231. 13. Chao, J. T., Parker, K. R., & Fontana, A. (2011). Developing an Interactive Social Media Based Learning Environment. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 8, 323–334. 14. Concannon, F., Flynn, A., & Campbell, M. (2005). What campus-based students think about the quality and benefits of e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 501–512. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00482.x 15. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. (2014). Kamus Dewan Edisi Keempat. Retrieved December 11, 2014, from http://prpm.dbp.gov.my/Search.aspx?k=kolaboratif 16. Donde, D. S., Chopade, N., & P. V., R. (2012). Social networking sites: A new era of 21 st century. SIES Journal of Management, 8(1), 66–73. 17. Dziuban, C., & Moskal, P. (2001). Evaluating Distributed Learning at Metropolitan Universities. Communication Studies, (4), 60–61. 18. eBizMBA. (2014). Top 15 Most Popular Social Networking Sites | October 2014. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from http://www.ebizmba.com/articles/social-networking-websites 19. Eda Gözde, G. (2011). A Web 2.0 Tool for Language Teaching with Flash Content. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 627–631. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.105 20. Ellis, R. A., Goodyear, P., Prosser, M., & O´Hara, A. (2006). How and what university students learn trough online and face to face discussion: conceptions, intentions and approaches. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22,. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 244–256. 21. Ellis, R. A., Steed, A. F., & Applebee, A. C. (2006). Teacher conceptions of blended learning, blended teaching and associations with approaches to design. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 22(3), 312–335. http://doi.org/10.4103/0974-620X.60017 22. Erdem, M., & Pinar, N. K. (2014). Students’ Opinions On Facebook Supported Blended Learning Environment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 199–206. 23. Fleck, J. (2012). Blended learning and learning communities: opportunities and challenges. Journal of Management Development, 31(4), 398–411. http://doi.org/10.1108/02621711211219059 24. Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95–105. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001 25. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons. 26. Gialamas, V., Nikolopoulou, K., & Koutromanos, G. (2013). Student Teachers’ Perceptions About the Impact of Internet Usage on Their Learning and Jobs. Computers & Education, 62, 1–7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.012 27. Ginns, P., Prosser, M., & Barrie, S. (2007). Students’ perceptions of teaching quality in higher education: the perspective of currently enrolled students. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 603–615. http://doi.org/10.1080/03075070701573773 28. Graetz, K. a., & Goliber, M. J. (2002). Designing collaborative learning places: Psychological foundations and new frontiers. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(92), 13–22. http://doi.org/10.1002/tl.75 29. Graham, C. R., Allen, S., & Ure, D. (2005). Benefits and challenges of blended learning environments. In Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology (pp. 253–259). 30. Gray, K., Annabell, L., & Kennedy, G. (2010). Medical students’ use of Facebook to support learning: insights from four case studies. Medical Teacher, 32(12), 971–6. http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2010.497826 31. Grisham, D. L., & Wolsey, T. D. (2006). Recentering the Middle School Classroom as a Vibrant Learning Community: Students, Literacy, and Technology Intersect. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(8), 648–660. http://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.49.8.2 32. Hampton, K. N., Goulet, L. S., Rainie, L., & Purcell, K. (2011). Social networking sites and our lives. Washington, DC. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2011/Technology-and-social-networks.aspx 33. Hargadon, S. (2010). Educational Networking. Multimedia & Internet@Schools, 17(2), 10–16. 34. Heirdsfield, A., Walker, S., Tambyah, M., & Beutel, D. (2011). Blackboard as an online learning environment: What do teacher education students and staff think? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(July), 1–16. 35. Herrmann, N., Popyack, J., Char, B., & Zoski, P. (2004). Assessment of a course redesign: introductory computer programming using online modules. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, (March), 3–7. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=971326 36. Hisham, D., Mohd Sobri, D. @ A. W., & Hamzah, A. R. (2012). Blended learning (BL) As pedagogical alternative to teach business communication course: Case study of UUM executive diploma program. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13(July), 297–315. 37. Holcomb, L. B., & Beal, C. M. (2010). Capitalizing on Web 2 . 0 in the Social Studies Context. TechTrends, 54(4), 28–32. 38. Holcomb, L. B., Brady, K. P., & Smith, B. V. (2010). The Emergence of “Educational Networking”: Can Non-commercial, Education-based Social Networking Sites Really Address the Privacy and Safety Concerns of Educators? Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 475–481. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no2/holcomb_0610.pdf?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter 39. Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2011). The Rise of K–12 Blended Learning. Innosight Institute. San Mateo, CA. Retrieved from www.innosightinstitute.org 40. Horn, M. B., & Staker, H. (2015). Blended: Using Disruptive Innovation to Improve Schools (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand. 41. Hung, M.-L., & Chou, C. (2014). Students’ perceptions of instructors’ roles in blended and online learning environments: A comparative study. Computers & Education. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.022 42. Ibrahim, Y. K., & Mehmet, D. (2014). Effect of Blended Learning Environment Model on High School Students’ Academic Achievement. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 78–87. 43. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An Educational Psychology Success Story: Social Interdependence Theory and Cooperative Learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. http://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057 44. Johson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making Cooperative Learning Work. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 67–73. Retrieved from http://www.ccsstl.com/sites/default/files/Cooperative Learning Research .pdf 45. Judd, T. (2014). Making sense of multitasking : The role of Facebook. Computers & Education, 70, 194–202. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.013 46. Kaleta, R., Skibba, K., & Joosten, T. (2007). Discovering, Designing and Delivering Hybrid Courses. In A. G. Picciano & C. D. Dziuban (Eds.), Blended Learning Research Perspectives. Needham, MA: The Sloan Consortium. Retrieved from http://elab.learningandteaching.dal.ca/dalblend2013-files/blended-learning-research-perspectives-book.pdf#page=122 47. Kamla, A. A.-B. (2012). Learners ’ Perspective on Critical Factors to LMS Success in Blended Learning : An Empirical Investigation Learners ’ Perspective on Critical Factors to LMS Success in Blen ded Learning : An Empirical Investigation Perspective on Critical Factors LMS in B. Communication of The Association for Information Systems, 30(January), 11–34. 48. Kerres, M., & Witt, C. De. (2003). A Didactical Framework for the Design of Blended Learning Arrangements. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2–3), 101–113. http://doi.org/10.1080/1358165032000165653 49. Korkmaz, O., & Karakus, U. (2009). The Impact of Blended Learning Model on Student Attitudes towards Geography Course and Their Critical Thinking Dispositions and Levels. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology- …, 8(4), 51–63. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ859497 50. Köse, U. (2010). A Blended Learning Model Supported with Web 2.0 Technologies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 2794–2802. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.417 51. Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from http://scholar.google.com/ 52. Light, D. (2012). Principals for Web 2.0 Success. 10 ways to build vibrant learning communities with the read/write web. Learning and Leading with Technology, (July), 18–20. 53. Lothridge, K., Fox, J., & Fynan, E. (2013). Blended learning: efficient, timely and cost effective. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 45(4), 407–416. http://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2013.767375 54. Mahajan, T., & Chaturvedi, S. (2013). Impact Study of Blended Learning on Functional Effectiveness Factor of Managerial Effectiveness. Journal of Management Research, 13(4), 209–218. 55. Maier, T. a., & Thomas, N. J. (2013). Hospitality Leadership Course Design and Delivery: A Blended‐Experiential Learning Model. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 25(1), 11–21. http://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2013.777585 56. Marco, F. (2013). Drawer: An innovative teaching method for blended learning. Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, 727–734. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=6644089 57. Masalela, R. K. (2009). Potential Benefits and Complexities of Blended Learning In Higher Education : The case of the University of Botswana. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 10(1), 66–83. 58. Mccarthy, J. (2010). Blended learning environments : Using social networking sites to enhance the first year experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(6), 729–740. Retrieved from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet26/mccarthy.html 59. Mckenzie, W. A., Perini, E., Rohlf, V., Toukhsati, S., Conduit, R., & Sanson, G. (2013). A Blended Learning Lecture Delivery Model for Large and Diverse Undergraduate Cohorts. Computers & Education, 64, 116–126. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.009 60. Mohammad, A., Norshakila, M. R., Mohamad Syazli, F., & Abdul Karim, M. (2014). Cloud Computing as a Construction Collaboration Tool for Precast Supply Chain M. Jurnal Teknologi, 70(7), 1–7. 61. Mortera-Gutiérrez, F. (2006). Faculty best practices using blended learning in e-learning and face-to-face instruction. International Journal on E-Learning, 5(3), 313–337. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/ 62. Mostmans, L., Vleugels, C., & Bannier, S. (2012). Raise Your Hands or Hands-on ? The Role of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning in Stimulating Intercreativity in Education. Educational Technology & Society, 15(4), 104–113. 63. Muhamad Azhar, S., Mohamad, I., & Amri, Y. (2014a). Engaging Vocational College Students Through Blended Learning : Improving Class Attendance and Participation. In Conference proceedings of the 4th World Congress on TVET 2014 (pp. 238–246). Melaka, Malaysia: UTHM. 64. Muhamad Azhar, S., Mohamad, I., & Amri, Y. (2014b). Pembangunan Model Blended Learning Menggunakan Teknologi Web 2.0 Dalam Pembelajaran Aliran Vokasional. In The 9 th International Malaysian Studies Conference ( MSC9 ) (pp. 1–19). Terengganu: Malaysian Social Science Association. 65. Mullamaa, K. (2010). ICT in Language Learning - Benefits and Methodological Implications. International Education Studies, 3(1), 38–44. 66. Munkhchimeg, B., & Sanjaasuren, B. (2013). Control possibility of students â€TM learning process through using Learning Management System. In Strategic Technology (IFOST), 2013 8th International Forum (pp. 395–399). Ulaanbaatar: IEEE. 67. Norazah, M. N., Rozniza, Z., Mohd Hanafi, M. Y., Rosseni, D., Mohamed Amin, E., & Maimun Aqsha, L. (2013). ICT in Educational for Deaf Learners: Teacher’ Perspective. Research Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(2), 103–111. 68. Oblinger, D., & Oblinger, J. (2006). Is It Age or IT : First Steps Toward Understanding the Net Generation. California School Library Association Journal, 29(2), 8–16. 69. Panitz, T., & Panitz, P. (1998). Encouraging the use of collaborative learning in higher education. In J. J. F. Forest (Ed.), University Teaching: International Perspectives (2013th ed., p. 488). New York: Routledge. Retrieved from https://books.google.com/books?id=WfVRAwAAQBAJ&pgis=1 70. Pape, L. (2015). Developing courses that combine face-to-face and virtual instruction in pursuit of 21st-century skills in classrooms. Retrieved April 8, 2015, from http://www.aasa.org/SchoolAdministratorArticle.aspx?id=12924 71. Rienties, B., Brouwer, N., & Lygo-baker, S. (2013). The effects of online professional development on higher education teachers ’ beliefs and intentions towards learning facilitation and technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 122–131. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.09.002 72. Rodrigues, J. J. P. C., Sabino, F. M. R., & Zhou, L. (2011). Enhancing e-learning experience with online social networks. IET Communications, 5(8), 1147. http://doi.org/10.1049/iet-com.2010.0409 73. Rowe, M., Bozalek, V., & Frantz, J. (2013). Using Google Drive to facilitate a blended approach to authentic learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(4), 594–606. http://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12063 74. Ruday, S. (2011). Expanding the possibilities of discussion: A strategic approach to using online discussion boards in the middle and high school English classroom. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(4), 350–361. Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol11/iss4/languagearts/article2.cfm 75. Sandars, John;Murray, C. (2009). Reflective learning for the next generation. In I. L. C. Terry T. Kidd (Ed.), Wired for Learning:an educator’s guide to web 2.0 (1st ed., pp. 153–168). USA: Information Age Publishing. 76. Sanden, S., & Darragh, J. (2011). Wiki Use in the 21st Century Literacy Classroom: A Framework for Evaluation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11, 6–20. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/35420 77. Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: exploring students’ education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(July 2014), 157–174. http://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902923622 78. Shepard, L. A. (2006). Classroom Assessment. In R. L. Brennan (Ed.), Educational Measurement (4th ed., pp. 623–646). Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers. 79. Shih, R. (2011). Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27, 829–845. Retrieved from http://ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/shih.html 80. Shivetts, C. (2011). E-Learning and Blended Learning : The Importance of the Learner : A Research Literature Review. International Jl. on E-Learning, 10(3), 331–337. 81. Shroff, R. H., & Vogel, D. R. (2009). Assessing the factors deemed to support individual student intrinsic motivation in technology supported online and face-to-face discussions. Journal of Information Technology Education, 8. Retrieved from http://libir1.ied.edu.hk/dspace/handle/2260.2/498 82. Shroff, R. H., & Vogel, D. R. (2010). An investigation on individual student’s perceptions on interest utilizing a blended learning approach. International Journal on E-Learning, 9(2), 279–294. 83. Skill, T. D., & Young, B. A. (2002). Embracing the hybrid model: Working at the intersections of virtual and physical learning spaces. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (92), 23–32. 84. Smith, N. V. (2013). Face-to-face vs . blended learning : Effects on secondary students ‘ perceptions and performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 89, 79–83. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.08.813 85. Taranto, G., Dalbon, M., & Gaetano, J. (2011). Academic Social Networking Brings Web 2 . 0 Technologies to the Middle Grades. Middle School Journal, 42(5), 12–19. 86. Vernadakis, N., Giannousi, M., Derri, V., Michalopoulos, M., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2012). The impact of blended and traditional instruction in students’ performance. Procedia Technology, 1, 439–443. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.098 87. Vesisenaho, M., Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Havu-nuutinen, S., Hartikainen, A., & Karkkainen, S. (2010). Blended learning with everyday technologies to activate students’ collaborative learning. Science Education International, 21(4), 272–283. 88. Wai, C. C., & Seng, E. L. K. (2013). Measuring the effectiveness of blended learning environment: A case study in Malaysia. Education and Information Technologies. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9293-5 89. Welker, J., & Berardino, L. (2006). Blended Learning: Understanding The Middle Ground Between Traditional Classroom And Fully Online Instruction. Journal of Educational Technology System, 34(1), 33–55. 90. Wikipedia. (2015). Web 2.0. 91. Wodzicki, K., Schwämmlein, E., & Moskaliuk, J. (2012). “Actually, I Wanted to Learn”: Study-related Knowledge Exchange on Social Networking Sites. The Internet and Higher Education, 15, 9–14. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.05.008 92. Wu, J.-H., Tennyson, R. D., & Hsia, T.-L. (2010). A study of student satisfaction in a blended e-learning system environment. Computers & Education, 55(1), 155–164. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.12.012 93. Yong, H. A., Fadhilah, M. Y., & Noorulsadiqin Azbiya, Y. (2013). Communication In Learning Management System (LMS): The Impact On Student Learning Satisfaction. Prosiding Simposium Pengurusan Teknologi, Operasi & Logistik, (Siptik V), 10–11. 94. Yu, M., Yuen, A. H. K., Park, J., Lam, H. C., Lau, K. K., & Lau, W. (2011). Web 2.0 Divide among Naughty insiders, Worried Outsiders, and Invisible Monitors: A Case Study. In Communications in Computer and Information Science (Vol. 177 CCIS, pp. 51–62). http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22383-9_5