UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Full Text : |
| The field hockey coaching process across both Malaysia and India favours a traditional,coach-centred approach of mastering technical skills in terms of game play parameters, fitness, intensity, and load training, whereas a tactical- and player-centred pedagogical approach still takes a backseat. On the other hand, the Teaching Games for Understanding (TGfU) model offers tacticalcognitive instruction and is gaining international recognition for its ability to produce intelligent players via a problem-solving approach in game play. Therefore, the purpose of this quasiexperimental study was to investigate the effect of TGfU compared to skill mastery instruction, termed as Skill Drill Technical (SDT), among Malaysian and Indian elite junior hockey players in term of the game play attributes of adjust and cover in 5 vs. 5 small-sided game play and game play intensity via heartrate (HR) at different points of game play. A total of n = 60 players with an average age of 15 ± 1.03 was selected via simple random sampling from both countries involved in this study and assigned equally to groups, with 15 per group for TGfU and for SDT across Malaysia and India. Gathered data were analysed using the ANOVA and ANCOVA techniques. Findings indicated that there were no significant differences for adjust in 5 vs. 5 game play between TGfU and SDT across Malaysia and India after the intervention. For cover, there was significant improvement for Malaysian players using the TGfU model compared to SDT. In contrast, there was no significant difference between these two models among the Indian players after the intervention. There was significant difference between these two models in terms of warm-up HR across the two countries, and HR was higher via TGfU. For HR immediately after the 5 vs. 5 game play intervention and HR after three minutes’ recovery, Indian players with TGfU recorded a higher and significant difference compared to SDT. However, findings indicated no significant difference between these two instruction types among Malaysians, although TGfU proved to have higher HR intensity. Therefore, these findings reiterated that TGfU is a useful approach for game play to enhance intensity and cardiac output. In conclusion, for TGfU to be more relevant to the coaching environment, future research should link game play and physiological parameters.TGfU should able to overcome the barriers of tradition and cultural background that may hinder its momentum. |
| References |
1. Grehaigne, J.F.; Godbout, P.; Bouthier, D. The teaching and learning of decision making in team sports.
Quest 2001, 53, 59–75.
2. Memmert, D.; Baker, J.; Bertsch, C. Play and practice in the development of sport-specific creativity in team
sports. High Abil. Stud. 2010, 21, doi:10.1080/13598139.2010.488083.
3. Metzler, M. Implications of models-based instruction for research on teaching: A focus on teaching games
for understanding. In Teaching Games for Understanding: Theory, Research, and Practice; Griffin, L.L., Butler,
J.I., Eds.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2005.
4. Fitts, P.M.; Posner, M.I. Human Performance; Brooks and Cole Publishing: Belmont, CA, USA, 1967.
5. Hopper, T. Teaching games for understanding: The importance of student emphasis over content emphasis.
J. Health Phys. Educ. Recreat. Dance 2002, 73, 44–48.
6. Harvey, S.; Cushion, C.; Wegis, H.; Conzalez, A. Teaching games for understanding in American highschool soccer: A quantitative data analysis using the game performance assessment instrument. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog. 2010, 15, 29–54.
7. Lawton, J. Comparison of two teaching methods in games. Bull. Phys. Educ. 1989, 25, 35–38.
8. Martin, A.J.; Gaskin, C.J. An Integrated Physical Education Model. J. Phys. Educ. N. Z. Te Kotuku Rerenge
2004, 37, 61–69.
9. Cabello, D.; Padial, P.; Lees, A.; Rivas, F. Temporaral and physiological characteristics of elite woman’s and men’ single badminton. Int. J. Appl. Sports Sci. 2004, 16, 1–12.
10. Desai, T.; Bootoms, L. Neck cooling improves table tennis performance amongst young national level
players. Sports 2017, 5, 1–12.
11. Shaw, I.; Shaw, B. Differences in maximum heart rates in distance runners during training competition and
laboratory testing. In Proceedings of the XIV Commonwealth International Sports Science Congress,
Manav Rachana International University, Faridabad, India, 27–30 September 2010.
12. Asci, A. Heart rate responses during small sided games and official match-play in soccer. Sports 2016, 4, 31.
13. Bunker, D.; Thorpe, R.A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bull. Phys. Educ. 1982, 18,
5–8.
14. Ghosh, A.K.; Goswami, A.; Mazumdar, P.; Mathur, D.N. Heart rate and blood lactate response in field
hockey players. Indian J. Med. Res. 1991, 94, 351–356.
15. Memmert, D.; Almond, L.; Bunker, D.; Butler, J.; Fasold, F.; Griffin, L.; Hillmann, W.; Hüttermann, S.; KleinSoetebier, T.; König, S.; et al. Top 10 research questions related to Teaching Games for Understanding. Res.Q. Exerc. Sport 2015, 86, 347–359.
16. Denis, G. Human Skills: Ideas, Concepts and Models. In Handbook Research in Sports Psychology; Macmillan
Publishing Company: New York, NY, USA, 1993.
17. Crespo, M.; Reid, M.M.; Miley, D. Tennis: Applied examples of a game-based teaching approach. Strategies
2004, 17, 27–31.
18. Drewe, S.B. An examination of the relationship between coaching and teaching. Natl. Assoc. Kinesiol. Phys.Educ. High. Educ. 2000, 52, 79–88.
19. Nevett, M.; Rovegno, I.; Babiarz, M.; McCaughtry, N. Changes in basic tactics and motor skills in an
invasion type game after a 12-lesson unit of instruction. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2001, 20, 352–369.
20. Rovengno, I.; Bandhauer, D. Elementary Physical Education Curriculum and Instruction; Jones & Bartlett
learning, Burlington, MA, USA, 2013.
21. McLean, S.; Kerhervé, H.; Naughton, M.; Lovell, G.P.; Gorman, A.D.; Solomon, C. The Effect of recovery
duration on technical proficiency during small-sided games of football. Sports 2016, 4, 39.
22. Nathan, S. Coaching school hockey in Malaysia: A exploratory analysis and effect of improvised TGfU
pedagogical model on small-sided game Play. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 2015, 15, 712–723.
23. Nathan, S. The effects and sustainability of training programmers’ using Teaching Games for Understanding (TGFU) with different teaching style on students with varying hockey skill levels. In Proceedings of the 1st Asia Pacific Sport in Education Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 21 January 2008.
24. Nathan, S.; Khanna, G. A comparison Study of TGfU with Technical training model in mini game performance, speed and accuracy among junior hockey players. Pan-Asian J. Sports Phys. Educ. 2012, 4, 23–37.
25. Turner, A. Teaching for understanding: Myth or reality? J. Phys. Educ. Recreat. Dance 1996, 67, 46–48.
26. Turner, A.; Martinek, T.J. An investigation into teaching games for understanding: Effects on skill,
knowledge, and game play. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 1999, 70, 286–296.
27. Harvey, S. A study of U19 college soccer players improved in game performance using the game
performance assessment instrument. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference: Teaching Sports
and Physical Education for Understanding, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 11–14 December 2003.
28. Gray, S.; Sproule, J. Developing pupils’ performance in team invasion games. Phys. Educ. Sport Pedagog.
2011, 16, 15–32.
29. Lythe, J.; Kilding, A.E. Physical Demands and Physiological Responses during Elite Field Hockey, Int. J.Sports Med. 2011, 32, 523–528.
30. Montgomery, D.L. Physiological profile of professional hockey players—A longitudinal study. Appl.
Physiol. Nutr. Metab.2006, 31,181–185.
31. Coutts, A.; Wallace, L.; Slattery, K. Monitoring training load. Sports Coach2004, 27, 1–4.
32. John, D.; Sterza, G.; Swensen, T. Monitoring exercise heart rate using manual palpitation. ACSM Health Fit.
J. 2007, 11, 1–4.
33. Jeukendrup, A.; Diemen, A.V. Heart rate monitoring during training and competition in cyclists. J. Sports
Sci.1998, 16 (Suppl. 1), 91–99.
34. Katis, A.; Kellis, E. Effects of Small-Sided Games on Physical Conditioning and Performance in Young
Soccer Players. J. Sports Sci. Med. 2009, 8, 374–380.
35. Lang, J.; Liu, Y. 4 to 4 game training method for women’s football player physical ability influence. Shenyang Sports Coll. J. 2010, 3, 122–125.
36. Sell, K.M.; Ledesma, A.B. Heart rate and energy expenditure in division I field hockey players during
competitive play. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2016, 30, 2122–2128.
37. Stanula, A.; Roczniok, R. Game intensity analysis of elite adolescent ice hockey players. J. Hum. Kinet. 2014,
44, 211–221.
38. Cherappurath, N.; Kabeer, D.A. Comparitive study on selected physiological variables between football
and handball players. Int. J. Recent Sci. Res. 2015, 6, 6095–6097.
39. French, K.E.; Werner, P.H.; Taylor, K.; Hussey, K.; Jones, J. The effects of a 6 week unit of tactical, skill, or combined tactical and skill instruction on badminton performance of ninth-grade students. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 1996, 15, 439–463.
40. Kirk, D.; MacPhail, A. Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the BunkerThorpe model. J. Teach. Phys. Educ. 2002, 21,177–192.
41. Corconi, F.; Ferrari, M.; Ziglio, P.G.; Droghetti, P.; Codeca, L. Determination of the anerobic threshold by a noninvasive field test in runners. J. Appl. Physiol. 1982, 52, 869–873.
42. Grehaigne, J.; Godbout, P. Tactical knowledge in team sports from a constructivist and cognitivist
perspective. Natl. Assoc. Kinesiol. Phys. Educ. High. Educ. 1995, 47, 490–505.
43. Mitchell, S.A.; Griffin, L.L.; Oslin, J.L. Tactical awareness as a developmentally appropriate focus for
teaching of games in elementary and secondary physical education. Phys. Educ. 1994, 51, 21–27.
44. Werner, P.; Thorpe, R.; Bunker, D. Teaching games for understanding: Evolution of a model. J. Health Phys.
Educ. Dance 1996, 67, 28–33.
45. Mitchell, S.; Oslin, J.; Griffin, L. The effects of two instructional approaches on game performance. Pedagog. Pract. 1995, 1, 36–48.
46. Mitchell, S.A.; Oslin, J.L.; Griffin, L.L. Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach, 2nd ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2006.
47. Mitchell, S.A.; Oslin, J.L.; Griffin, L.L. Teaching Sport Concepts and Skills: A Tactical Games Approach; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2005.
48. Bompa, T. Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training; Human Kinetic: Champaign, IL, USA, 1999.
49. Light, R. The joy of learning: Emotion and learning in games through TGFU. J. Phys. Educ. N. Z. 2003, 36,
93–103.
50. Light, R.; Fawns, R. Knowing the game: Integrating speech and action in games teaching through TGFU.
Natl. Assoc. Kinesiol. Phys. Educ. High. Educ. 2003, 55, 161–176.
51. Ghosh, A.K. Heart rate and blood lactate responses during execution of some specific strokes in badminton
drills. Int. J. Appl. Sports Sci. 2008, 20, 27–36.
52. Beachle, T.R.; Earle, R.W. Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning, 2nd ed.; Human Kinetics:
Champaign, IL, USA, 2000.
53. Clemente, F.; Rocha, R.; Martins, F.; Mendes, R. Acute effects of different formats of small-sided and
conditioned handball games on heart rate responses in female students during PE classes. Sports 2014,
2, 51–58.
54. Potteiger, J.; Weber, S.F. Ratings of perceived exertion and heart rate as indicators of exercise intensity in different environmental temperature. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 1994, 26, 791–796
55. Capranica, L.; Tessitore, A.; Guidetti, L.; Figura, F. Heart rate and match analysis in pre-pubescent soccer
players. J. Sports Sci. 2001, 19, 379–384
56. Clemente, F.; Rocha, R. The effects of task constraints on the heart rate responses of students during smallsided handball games. Kinesiol. Slov. 2012, 18, 27–35.
57. Castellano, J.; Casamichana, D.; Dellalj, A. Influence of game format and number of players on heart rate responses and physical demands in small-sided soccer games. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2013, 27, 1295–1303 |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |