UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Full Text : |
| BACKGROUND: Studies on genotypic and phenotypic correlations among characters of crop plants are useful in planning, evaluating and setting selection criteria for the desired characters in a breeding program. The present study aimed to estimate the phenotypic correlation coefficients among yield and yield attributed characters and to work out the direct and indirect effects of yield-related characters on yield per plant using path coefficient analysis. Twenty-six genotypes of chili pepper were laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. RESULTS: Yield per plant showed positive and highly significant (P ≤ 0.01) correlations with most of the characters studied at both the phenotypic and genotypic levels. By contrast, disease incidence and days to flowering showed a significant negative association with yield. Fruit weight and number of fruits exerted positive direct effect on yield and also had a positive and significant (P ≤ 0.01) correlation with yield per plant. However, fruit length showed a low negative direct effect with a strong and positive indirect effect through fruit weight on yield and had a positive and significant association with yield. CONCLUSION: Longer fruits, heavy fruits and a high number of fruits are variables that are related to higher yields of chili pepper under tropical conditions and hence could be used as a reliable indicator in indirect selection for yield. |
| References |
1. Dahal KC,Sharma MD,Dhakal DD and Shakya SM,Evaluation of heat tolerant chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes in Western Terai of Nepal. J Inst Agric Anim Sci 27:59–64 (2006).
2. Pagamas P. and Nawata E,Effect of high temperature during seed development on quality and chemical composition of chili pepper seeds. Japanese J Trop Agric 51:22–29 (2007).
3. Khah EM and Passam HC, Flowering, fruit set and development ofthe fruit and seed of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) cultivated under conditions of high ambient temperature. J Hortic Sci 67:251–258 (1992).
4. Gajanayake B, Trader BW, Reddy KR and Harkess RL, Screening ornamental pepper cultivars for temperature tolerance using pollen and physiological parameters. HortScience 46:878–884 (2011).
5. Islam MS, Ahmad S, Uddin MN, Rafii MY, Ismail MR and Malek MA, Identification of tomato inbred lines for heat tolerance through agronomic and physiological approaches. J Food Agric Environ 12:281–284 (2014).
6. Anonymous, World Travel Guide. [Online]. Available: http://www. worldtravelguide.net/malaysia/weather-climate-geography. [21 April 2013]
7. Tulu BN, Correlation and path coefficients analysis studies among yield and yield related traits of quality protein maize (QPM ) inbred lines.
Int J Plant Breed Crop Sci 1:6–17 (2014).
8. Mondal MMA, Hakim MA, Juraimi AS, Azad MAK and Karim MR, Contribution of morpho-physiological attributes in determining the yield of mungbean. African J Biotechnol 10:12897–12904 (2011).
9. Malek MA,Rafii MY,Shahida M,Afroz S Nath UK and Mondal
MMA, Morphological characterization and assessment of genetic variability, character association, and divergence in soybean mutants. Sci World J 12:968796 (2014).
10. Ajjapplavara PS, Patil SS, Hosamani RM, Patil AA and Gangaprasad S, Correlation and path coefficient analysis in chilli.Karnataka J. Agric Sci 18:748–751 (2005).
11. Misangu RN, Azmio AA, Reuben SOWM, Kusolwa PM and Mulungu LS, Path coefficient analysis among components of yield in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea L. Verdc) landraces under screen house conditions. J Agron 6:317–323 (2007).
12. Coombs J, Hind G, Leegood R, Tieszen L and Vonshak A, Analytical techniques. Tech. Bioproductivity Photosyn 2:219–228 (1985).
13. Kashiani P and Saleh G, Estimation of genetic correlations on sweet corn inbred lines using SAS mixed model. Am J Agric Biol Sci 5:309–314 (2010).
14. Wright S, Correlation and causation. J Agric Res 20:557–585 (1921).
15. Usman MG, Rafii MY, Ismail MR, Malek MA and Abdul Latif M, Heritability and genetic advance among chili pepper genotypes for heat tolerance and morphophysiological characteristics. Sci World J Article 2014:308042 (2014).
16. Jabeen N, Sofi PA and Wani SA, Character association in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). Rev UDO Agric 9:487–490 (2009).
17. Farhad MM, Hassanuzzaman BK, Biswas AK and Azad M Arifuzzaman, Reliability of yield contributing characters for improving yield potential in chilli. Int J Sustain Crop Prod 3:30–38 (2008).
18. Ganesh Reddy M, Mohan HD and Salimath PM, Correlation and path coefficient analysis in sugarcane. Karnataka J Agric Sci 21:259–261 (2008).
19. Hiremath NV, Genetics of fruit yield, yield components and reaction of major biotic stress in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.). PhD Thesis, Unversity of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad (1997).
20. Sabina I and Singh RV, Correlation and path analysis in sweet pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Veg Sci 36:128–130 (2009).
21. Misra S, Lai RK, Darokar MP and Khanuja SP, Genetic associations and path-coefficient analysis of the economic traits in the chili (Capsicum annuum L.). Electron J Plant Breed 1:346–350 (2010).
22. Ukkund KC, Patil MP, Madalageri MB, Mulage R and Jagadeesh RC, Character association and path analysis studies in green chilli for yield and yield attributes (Capsicum annuum L.). Karnataka J Agric
Sci 20:99–101 (2007).
23. Munshi AD, Behra TK and G. Singh, Correlation and path analysis in chilli. Indian Journal of Horticulture 57:157–159 (2000).
24. Raikar G, Karad SR and Navale PA, Variability and path-coefficient analysis in chilli. J Maharashtra Agril Univ 30:90–91 (2005). |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |