UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
This study investigates the relationship between Principal Change Leadership Competencies, Teacher Change Beliefs and Teacher Attitudes toward Change. A total of 936 teachers from 47 High Performing Secondary Schools in Malaysia completed the survey. Structural equation modelling was applied to test the models. Firstly, the results showed that Principal Change Leadership Competencies was significantly related to Teacher Change Beliefs and implied that if school principals equipped themselves with sufficient Principal Change Leadership Competencies, Teacher Change Beliefs can certainly be enhanced. Secondly, Teacher Change Beliefs was significantly related to Teacher Attitudes toward Change whereby the stronger the Teacher Change Beliefs, the greater the enhancement of Teacher Attitudes toward Change. Thirdly, Teacher Change Beliefs was indeed a total mediator in the relationship of Principal Change Leadership Competencies and Teacher Attitudes toward Change. Put simply, via Teacher Change Beliefs, the impact of Principal Change Leadership Competencies on Teacher Attitudes toward Change was relatively strong as Teacher Change Beliefs greatly facilitated the influence of Principal Change Leadership Competencies on Teacher Attitudes toward Change. Thus, in-depth enhancing Teacher Change Beliefs is one of the effective ways to increase the likelihood of teachers to embrace change. Fourthly, Principal Change Leadership Competencies was more influential than teachers’ self-influence in enhancing Teacher Attitudes toward Change. Therefore, concerted effort must be given to prioritize the continuous development of principal change leadership in effective change management. The study encourages a fresh look at change leadership development and ultimately alters the traditional approach of school principals in managing change. |
References |
1. Ahmad, A. R., Salleh, M. J., Awang, M. M., & Mohamad, N. A. (2013). Investigating best practice and effectiveness of leadership wisdom among principals of excellent secondary school in Malaysia: Perceptions of senior assistants. International Education Studies, 6, 38–46. doi:10.5539/ies.v6n8p38
2. Ainscow, M., Beresford, J., Harris, A., Hopkins, D., Southworth, G., & West, M. (2012). Creating the conditions for school improvement: A handbook of staff development activities. New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Anghelachea, V., & Bentea, C. C. (2012). Educational changes and teachers’ attitudes towards change. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 593–597. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.01.190
4. Anthony, S., Said, H., Mohamad, I., & Mokhtar, M. (2015). Self-efficacy belief as a practical and parsimonious evaluation criterion in school leadership training. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 20–29. doi:10.5901/mjss.2015. v6n1s1p20
5. Armenakis, A. A., Bernerth, J. B., Pitts, J. P., & Walker, H. J. (2007). Organizational change recipients’ beliefs scale: Development of an assessment instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 481–505.
doi:10.1177/0021886307303654
6. Awang, Z. (2012). A handbook on structural equation modelling: SEM using AMOS graphic (5th ed.). Kota Baru: Universiti Teknologi Mara Kelantan.
7. Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
8. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
10. Bernal, E. (2009). Designing transformational leadership development programmes. Business Leadership Review, 6(6), 1–17.
11. Boak, G., & Coolican, D. (2001). Competencies for retail leadership: Accurate, acceptable, affordable. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 22, 212–220. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005675
12. Bonder, A. (2003). A blueprint for the future: Competency-based management in HRDC. Unpublished presentation. HRDC, Canada.
13. Boyatsis, R. E. (1982). The competent manager: A model of effective performance. New York, NY: Wiley.
Bueno, C., & Tubbs, S. (2005). Identifying global leadership competencies: An exploratory study. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 5, 80–87.
14. Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy, and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27, 391–406.
15. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Cairns, M. (2000). Competency theory leadership. In H. B. Smit & L. Carstens (Eds.), The influence of leadership role competencies on organization change outcome in the manufacturing industry in South Africa (pp. 45–52). Retrieved from http://www.sajhrm.co.za/index.php/sajhrm/article/download/16/16
17. Caporarello, L., & Viachka, A. (2010). Individual readiness for change in the context of enterprise resource planning systems implementation. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2010/419
18. Chan, S. S. (2002). How does principal’s leadership influence teachers’ beliefs? Case study of a secondary school in Hong Kong (Unpublished master’s thesis). The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
19. Childs-Bowen, D., Moller, G., & Scrivner, J. (2000). Principals: Leaders of leaders. NASSP Bulletin, 84,27–34. doi:10.1177/019263650008461606
20. Conger, C. L., & Kanungo, R. N. (1998). Charismatic leadership in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crawford, L. H. (2003). Assessing and developing project management competence. In J. R. Turner (Ed.), People in
project management (pp. 23–47). Aldershot: Gower.
21. de Vaus, D. A. (1995). Surveys in school research. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
22. Demir, K. (2008). Transformational leadership and collective efficacy: The moderating roles of collaborative culture and teachers’ self-efficacy. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 33, 93–112.
23. Duffy, F. (2009). Change leadership competencies (Part 2). Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m19578/1.4/
24. Dunham, R. B., Grube, J. A., Gardner, D. G., Cummings, L. L., & Pierce, J. L. (1989). The development of an attitude toward change instrument. Unpublished discussion paper 124. Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
25. El-Farra, M. M., & Badawi, M. B. (2012). Employee attitudes toward organizational change in the Coastal Municipalities Water Utility in the Gaza strip. EuroMed Journal of Business, 7, 161–184. doi:10.1108/14502191211245598
26. Eslami, Z. R., & Fatahi, A. (2008). Teachers’ sense of self-efficacy, English proficiency, and instructional strategies: A study of non-native EFL teachers in Iran. TESL-EJ, 11(4), 1–19.
27. Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
28. Fisler, J. L., & Firestone, W. A. (2006). Teacher learning in a school-university partnership: Exploring the role of social trust and teaching efficacy beliefs. Teachers College Record, 108, 1155–1185.
29. Ford, M. E. (1992). Motivating humans: Goals, emotions and personal agency beliefs. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
30. Fowler, F. J. (2009). Survey research methods (4th ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
32. Giannakaki, M. S., & Belikaidi, E. (2012). Individual and school-level determinants of teachers’ attitudes towards change: A multilevel analysis in the context of Greek primary schools. Retrieved from www.cceam2012.com/presentation_pdf139. pdf
33. Grinin, L. (2010). The role of an individual in history: A re-consideration. Social Evolution and History, 9, 95–136.
34. Hair, J. F., Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey, NJ: Prentice Hall.
35. Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. (2011). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
36. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (1999). Next generation methods for the study of leadership and school improvement. In
37. J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 141–162). San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
38. Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. (2002). What do you call people with visions? The role of vision, mission, and goals in school leadership and improvement. In K. Leithwood & P. Hallinger (Eds.), Second international handbook of educational leadership and administration (pp. 9–40). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
39. Harris, S. G., & Cole, M. S. (2007). A stages of change perspective on managers’ motivation to learn in a leadership development context. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 67–74. doi:10.1108/09534810710831019
40. Hayes, J. (2010). The theory and practice of change management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
41. Higgs, M. J., & Rowland, D. (2000). Building change leadership capability: ‘The quest for change competence’. Journal of Change Management, 1, 116–130. doi:10.1080/714042459
42. Holt, D. T., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S., & Harris, S. G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 232–255. doi:10.1177/0021886306295295 Humayun, R. (2008). The impact of change message on the commitment to a change: An analysis of IT professionals in India and Malaysia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cleveland, OH: Case Western Reserve University.
43. Jones, M., Adams, D., Tan, H. J., Muniandy, V., Perera, C. J., & Harris, A. (2015). Contemporary challenges and changes: Principals’ leadership practices in Malaysia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 35, 353–365. doi:10.1080/02188791.2015.1056591
44. Juechter, W. M., Caroline, F., & Alford, R. J. (1998). Five conditions for high performance cultures. Training and Development, 52, 63–76.
45. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
46. Kotter, J. P. (1999). Leading change. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
47. Kursunoglu, A., & Tanrıogen, A. (2009). The relationship between teachers’ perceptions towards instructional leadership behaviors of their principals and teachers’ attitudes towards change. Procedia Social and Behavioural Science, 1, 252–258. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.046
48. Lakomski, G. (2001). Organizational change, leadership and learning: Culture as cognitive process. International Journal of Educational Management, 15, 68–77. doi:10.1108/09513540110383791
49. Leithwood, K. (1992). The move to transform leadership. Educational Leadership, 49, 8–12.
50. Leithwood, K. (1996). School restructuring, transformational leadership and the amelioration of teacher burnout. Anxiety, Stress and Coping, 9, 199–215. doi:10.1080/10615809608249402
51. Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: Effects on
students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17, 201–227.
doi:10.1080/09243450600565829
52. Leithwood, K., Jantzi, D., Earl, L., Watson, N., Levin, B., & Fullan, M. (2004). Strategic leadership for large-scale reform: The case of England’s national literacy and numeracy strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24, 57–79.
doi:10.1080/1363243042000172822
53. Leithwood, K., & Seashore Louis, K. (2012). Linking leadership to student learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
54. Lewin, K. (1958). Group decisions and social change. In G. E. Swanson, T. M. Newcomb, & E. L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in social psychology (pp. 62–73). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
55. Macneil, A. J., Prater, D. J., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12, 73–84. doi:10.1080/13603120701576241
56. Magno, C. (2005). The role of meta cognitive regulation and learning approach on achievement and its effect on academic self efficacy. Paper presented at the Annual Psychological Association of the Philippines, Baguio, Philippines.
57. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2010). School performance development program. Kuala Lumpur: Author.
58. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013–2025. Putrajaya: Author.
Nilakant, V., & Ramnarayan, S. (2006). Change management: Altering mindset in a global context. New Delhi: Response
Books.
59. Onafowora, L. L. (2005). Teacher efficacy issues in the practice of novice teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 28, 34–44.
60. Oplatka, I. (2003). School change and self renewal: Some reflections from life stories of women principals. Journal of Educational Change, 4, 25–43. doi:10.1023/A:1023081708728
61. Oplatka, I. (2016). A call to adopt the concept of responsible leadership in our schools: Some insights from the business literature. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13603124.20 16.1186846
62. Oreg, S., & Berson, Y. (2011). Leadership and employees’ reactions to change: The role of leaders’ personal attributes and transformational leadership style. Personnel Psychology, 64, 627–659. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01221.x
63. Pare, G., Sicotte, C., & Poba-Nzaou, P. (2010). Perceived organizational readiness for IT-based change and its antecedents: An exploratory study in the healthcare sector. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 390, 137–151. Retrieved from http://aisle.aisnet.org/amcis2010/390
64. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
65. Rosnarizah, A. H., Amin, S., & Abdul Razak, M. (2009). Innovation in educational management and leadership: High impact competency for Malaysian school leaders. Retrieved from www.seameo.org/vl/library/dlwelcome/projects/jasper/../FullPaper.pdf
66. Ross, J. A., & Gray, P. (2006). School leadership and student achievement: The mediating effects of teacher beliefs. Canadian Journal of Education, 29, 798–822. doi:10.2307/20054196
67. Sabates, L. A., & Capdevila, J. M. (2010). Contribution for attitude change theory on the conceptual relation between attitudes and competencies. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8, 1283–1302.
68. Sarafidou, J. O., & Nikolaidis, D. I. (2009). School leadership and teachers’ attitudes toward school change: The case of high schools in Greece. The International Journal of Learning, 16, 431–440.
69. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Sentočnik, S., Sales, G. C., & Richardson, J. W. (2016). Educational reform in Georgia: Recommendations for building leadership capacity as a critical success factor for instructional change. International Journal of Leadership in Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13603124.2016.1224931
71. Smit, H. B. (2003). The influence of leadership role competences on organizational change outcome in the manufacturing industry in South Africa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Johannesburg: Rand Afrikaans University, Johannesburg.
72. Smollan, R. K. (2006). Minds, hearts and deeds: Cognitive, affective and behavioural responses to change. Journal of Change Management, 6, 143–158. doi:10.1080/14697010600725400
73. Streiner, D. L. (1994). Figuring out factors: The use and misuse of factor analysis. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 39, 135–140.
74. Steiner, L., & Hassel, E. A. (2011). Using competencies to improve school turnaround principal success. Chapel Hill, NC:Public Impact.
75. Tai, M. K. (2013). Modelling of principal change leadership competencies and its relationship with teacher change beliefs and teacher attitudes toward change (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tanjong Malim, Perak: Universiti Pendidikan
Sultan Idris.
76. Tai, M. K., Omar, A. K., Mohamad Sahari, N., & Khuan, W. B. (2014). The development of principal change leadership competency model: A structural equation modelling (SEM) approach. International Studies in Educational Administration, 42, 3–44.
77. Tai, M. K., Omar, A. K., Mohamad Sahari, N., & Khuan, W. B. (2015). Teacher change beliefs: Validating a scale with structural equation modelling. School Leadership and Management, 35, 266–299. doi:10.1080/13632434.2014.962503
78. Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2015). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013. Theory development,empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management, Administration, and Leadership,44, 146–164. doi: 10.1177/1741143214558576
79. Tizard, J. (2001). Seamless change. Management, 48, 62–65. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2007). The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 944–956. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003
80. Tubbs, S. L., & Schulz, E. (2006). Exploring a taxonomy of global leadership competencies and meta-competencies. The Journal of American Academy of Business, 8, 35–47.
81. Walker, J. A. (2009). The impact of principal leadership behaviours on the efficacy of new and experienced middle school teachers (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). College of Notre Dame, Maryland, MD.
82. Yeh, Y. (2006). The interactive effects of personal traits and guided practices on preservice teachers’ changes in personal teaching efficacy. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 513–526. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00550.x
83. Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in organization (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
84. Zainal, A. A., Surienty, L., Talib, A., Effendi, A. A., Rohaida, S., & Mohamed, Z. (2009). Understanding organizational behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |