UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :2226-6348
Main Author :Kin Tai Mei, Kareem Omar Abdull,
Title :An exploration of the relationship between teacher change beliefs and teacher attitudes toward change
Place of Production :HRMARS
Year of Publication :2017

Full Text :
The purpose of the study was twofold: a) to examine the causal relationship of teacher change beliefs (TCB) and teacher attitudes toward change (TATC); b) to investigate the moderating effects of Principal Change Leadership Competencies (PCLC), gender, age, year of experience, and school location on the above relationship. A total of 936 teachers from 47 High Performing Secondary School in Malaysia completed the survey. Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) was applied to test the models whereas multi-group comparison method in SEM was conducted to examine the moderating effects. The result demonstrated that TCB was significantly related to TATC (.89). This implied that TCB shapes TATC and provides the foundation for adoptive or resistance behaviours in school change. The findings also showed that PCLC facilitated significantly the causal relationship between TCB and TATC. Hence, school principals need to equip themselves with PCLC so to enhance positive TCB and TATC to advance change goals. However, it was found that the moderating effects of demographic factors such as gender, age, year of experience and school location were not significant moderating variables. The study offers relevant parties a lens through which they could better understand, prepare for, or enhance teacher capacity for change.

References
1. Armenakis,A. A.,Bernerth, J. B.,Pitts, J. P., & Walker,H. J.(2007). Organizational change recipients’ beliefs scale: Development of an assessment instrument. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,43(4), 481-505. 2. Aslan, M., Beycioglu, K., & Konan, N. (2008). Principals’ openness to change in Malatya, Turkey. Retrieved from http://www.ucalgary.ca/iejll/vol12/konan Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. 3. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148. 4. Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Field, H. S., & Walker, H. (2007). Justice, cynicism, and commitment: A study of important organizational change variables. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43(3), 303-326. 5. Bouckenooghe, D. (2009). Change recipients' attitudes toward change: A review study. Vlerick Leuven Gent Working Paper Series, 14, 201-217. 6. Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. 7. Caporarello, L., & Viachka, A. (2010). Individual readiness for change in the context of enterprise resource planning systems implementation. Retrieved from http://aisel. aisnet.org/amcis2010/419 8. Cheung, H. Y. (2008). Teacher efficacy: A comparative study of Hong Kong and Shanghai primary in-service teachers. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 103-123. 9. Crawford, L.H. (2003). Assessing and developing project management competence. In J.R. Turner (Ed.), People in Project Management. Aldershot: Gower. 10. Cunningham, C. (2006). The relationships among commitment to change, coping with change, and turnover intentions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 29-45. 11. Deloitte & Touche. (1996). Executive survey of manufacturers. Retrieved from http://www. dtcg.co/research 12. Duffy, F. (2009). Change leadership competencies (Part 2). Retrieved from http://cnx.org/content/m19578/1.4/ 13. Dunham, R.B., Grube, J.A., Gardner, D.G., Cummings, L.L., & Pierce, J.L. (1989). The development of an attitude toward change instrument. Strategic Management Research Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 14. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology. 15. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College. 16. Guo, Y., Justice, L.M., Kaderavek, J.N., & Pista, S.B. (2010). Relations among preschool teachers’ self-efficacy, classroom quality and children’s language and literacy gains. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1094-1103. 17. Hair, J. F. Jr., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. 18. Hall, G.E., & Hord, S. (2010). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes. Boston: Pearson. 19. Hallinger, P. (2004). Meeting the challenges of cultural leadership: The changing role of principals in Thailand. Discourse, 25(1), 61-73. 20. Harris, A. (2006). Leading change in schools in difficulty. Journal of Educational Change, 7(2), 9-18 21. Hayes, J. (2010). The theory and practice of change management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. 22. Holt, D.T., Armenakis, A.A., Field, H.S., & Harris, S.G. (2007). Readiness for organizational change: The systematic development of a scale. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 43(2), 232-255. 23. Hughes, M. A. & Benigni, M.D. (2012). The supportive leader. American School Board Journal,23-24. 24. Jerald, C. D. (2007). Believing and achieving (Issue Brief). Washington, DC: Centre for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement. 25. Kiefer, T. (2005). Feeling bad: Antecedents and consequences of negative emotions in ongoing change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(8), 875-897. 26. Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford. 27. Koo, A.C. (2008). Factors affecting teachers’ perceived readiness for online collaborative learning: A case study in Malaysia. Educational Technology and Society, 11(1), 266-278. 28. Kotter, J.P. (1999). Leading Change. Boston: Harvard Business School. 29. Kursunoglu, A., & Tanriogen, A. (2009). The relationship between teachers’ perceptions towards instructional leadership behaviors of their principals and teachers attitudes towards change. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2009(1), 252-258. 30. Levin, H.M. (2001). Learning from school reform. Paper presented at the International Conference on Rejuvenating Schools through Partnership, Chinese University of Hong Kong,Hong Kong, May 22-24. 31. Lorenzo, A.L. (1998). A framework for fundamental change: Context, criteria, and culture. Journal of Research & Practice, 22(4), 335-348.ajed M. El-Farra & Mohammed B. Badawi.(2012). Employee attitudes toward organizational change in the Coastal Municipalities Water Utility in the Gaza Strip. Euro Med Journal of Business, 7(2), 161-184. 32. Martin, A. J., Jones, E. S., & Callan, V. J. (2006). Status differences in employee adjustment during organizational change. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(2), 145-162. 33. Md Zabid Abdul Rashid, Murali Sambasivan, & Azmawani Abdul Rahman. (2004). The influence of organizational culture on attitude toward organizational change. Leadership and Organizational Development Journal, 23(2), 161-179. 34. Miller, V. D., Johnson, J. R., & Grau, J. (1994). Antecedents to willingness to participate in a planned organizational change. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22(1), 59-80. 35. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2013). Malaysia education blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. 36. Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context, and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 15(1), 73-101. 37. Pare, G., Sicotte, C., & Poba-Nzaou, P. (2010). Perceived organizational readiness for IT-based change and its antecedents: An exploratory study in the healthcare sector. Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS), 390, 137-151. Retrieved from http://aisle. aisnet.org/amcis2010/390 38. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA:Sage. 39. Piderit, S.K. (2000). Rethinking resistance and recognizing ambivalence: A multidimensional view of attitudes toward an organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 783-794. 40. Smith, I. (2005). Continuing professional development and workplace learning 11: Managing the “people” side of organisational change. Library Management,26(3), 152-155. 41. Spreitzer, G. M., & Mishra, A. K. (2002). To stay or to go: Voluntary survivor turnover following an organizational downsizing. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 23(6), 707-729. 42. Tai, M. K. (2013). Modeling of principal change leadership competencies and its relationship with teacher change beliefs and teacher attitudes toward change (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sultan Idris Education University, Malaysia. 43. Waldrop, M.M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster Paperbacks. 44. Walsh, G., Evanschitzky, H., & Wanderlich, M. (2008). Identification and analysis of moderator variables: Investigating the customer satisfaction-loyalty link. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10), 997-1004. 45. Wanberg, C. R., & Banas, J. T. (2000). Predictors and outcomes of openness to changes in a reorganizing workplace. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 132-142.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.