UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Full Text : |
| The aim of this paper is to discuss the development and psychometric validation of the Learner Awareness Questionnaire (LALQ) using exploratory factor analysis and correlation studies with the Revised Two Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) and Revised Achievement Goal Questionnaire (AGQ-R). This instrument assesses the approaches students take to learn and why they learn. The purpose for developing the LALQ is to provide an easy to administer student approaches to learning questionnaire that is designed specifically for Malaysian students that is comparable in terms of reliability and validity to other more establish instruments like to R-SPQ-2F and the AGQ-R. An initial set of 36 items of the LALQ were derived from the data collected from a phenomenological study and existing literature on student learning. A process of testing and refinement, using 172 randomly selected undergraduate students from various faculties of a university in Malaysia, resulted in four learner awareness scales, with 9 items for Survival, 4 items for Establishing Stability, 4 items for Approval and 4 items for Loving to Learn. A fresh sample of 331 randomly selected undergraduate students from the same university was used to test the final version of the LALQ which had acceptable Cronbach alpha values for scale reliabilities. The LALQ was then validated using discriminant and convergent validation with two well established instruments the R-SPQ-2F and the AGQ-R. The overall results show that the LALQ is a reliable and valid tool to measure student learning and is easy for students to relate to and complete. This instrument is also significantly correlated to the R-SPQ-2F and the AGQ-R. The LALQ is a simple self-reporting questionnaire that teachers and students can use to evaluate the learning that takes place in the classroom. It is also aimed at providing teacher with a relevant tool to use for evaluation and research in their classroom. |
| References |
1. Bell, A. (1993). Awareness of learning, reflection and transfer in school mathematics. British Society for Research into learning mathematics (pp. 1-6). Manchester: BSLRM.
2. Biggs, J. (1987). Student approaches to learning and studying. Camberwell: Australian Council for Educational Research.
3. Biggs, J. (1999). What the Student Does: teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 18(1), 57-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105
4. Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University : What the Student Does (3rd Edition). Berkshire: Open University Press.
5. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2001). The revised two factor study process questionnaire:R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709901158433
6. Boyle, T. (2011). Learner centered teaching : Putting the research on learning into practice. Sterling: Stylus Publishing.
7. Choy, S. C., Ooi, H. J., Sedhu, D. S., Liew, Y. L., Lee, M. Y., Malenee, A., et al. (2014). Students' Awareness of How and Why They Learn. International Symposium on Education and Psychology. Nagoya: University of Nagoya.
8. Choy, S. C., Sedhu, D. S., Liew, Y. L., Lee, M. Y., Malenee, A., & Anuar, N. (2015). Influence of culture on students’ awareness of how and why they learn. Malaysian
Journal of Learning and Instruction, 12, 47-66.
9. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Reaearch Methods in Education. London: Routledge-Falmer.
10. Dassa, C., Lambert, J., Blais, R., Potvin, D., & Gauthier, N. (1997). The effects of neutral answer choice onthe reliability and validity of attitude and opinion items. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 12(2), 61-80.
11. Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. J. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501-519.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
12. Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 x 2 Achievement Goal Model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 632–648. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023952
13. Entwistle, N. (2000). Some aspects of the teaching environment influencing approaches to studying. Edinburgh 2000 Group. Edinburgh.
14. Field, A. (2012). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London: Sage.
15. Fukuda, E. (2011). Cross-cultural validation of emotional intelligence measures for Japanese and Canadian university students. Unpublished doctorial disseration, Calgary
16. Goh, P. S., & Matthews, B. (2010). Malaysian students' learning and teaching at the postgraduate level. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 287-299.
17. Immekus, J. C., & Imbrie, P. K. (2010). A test and cross validation of the revised two factor study process qustionnaire factor structure among western university students.Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 495–510.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164409355685
18. Koutra, K., Orfanos, P., Roumelio, T., Kritsotakis, G., Kokkevi, A., & Philalithis, A. (2012). Psychometric validation of the youth capital scale in Greece. Research on Social Work in Practice, 22(3), 333-343, https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731511425801
19. Marton, F., & Booth, S. (1997). Learning and awareness. New Jersey: Erlbaum.
20. Mason, G. (1996). Recent advances for questionnaire design for program evaluation. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 73-93.
21. Quick, S., & Davis, K. (1979). A self-reporting evaluation tool. Journal of Extension, 20-25.
22. Raiker, A. (2009). A personalised approach to improving students' learning outcomes. In C. H.
Nygaard, & N. Clive Courtney, Improving students' learning outcomes (pp. 45-63). Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
23. Riou, F., Boiché, J., Doron, J., Romain, A.-J., & Corrion, K. (2012). Development and validation of the French achievement goals questionnaire for sport and exercise (FAGQSE). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 28(4), 313–320.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000112
24. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2014). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Pearson.
25. Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2011). Needs and subjective well-being around the world. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 354-356.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023779
26. Tzou, J. C. (2008). Towards the construction and initial validation of the Asian intimate partner abuse scale. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Kentucky.
27. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: The Falmer Press.
Vygotsky, L. (1986). Thought and language. Boston: The MIT Press.
28. Williams, M., Mecer, S., & Ryan, S. (2015). Exploring psychology in language learning and teaching. London: Oxford.
29. Winfree, W. R., Meyers, A. W., & Whelan, J. P.(2013). Validation of a Spanish translation of the gambler's belief questionnaire. Psychology of addictive behaviors, 27(1), 274-278. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030824. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |