UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Full Text : |
| The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) is a 20-item questionnaire used to measure higher education students’ deep and surface approaches to learning. The purpose of the present study was to validate the Malay language version of the R-SPQ-2F factor structure, based on two data sets of Malaysian pre-service teachers. The methods used were: (a) an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with an oblique rotation with the first data set (n = 221), and (b) a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) with the second data set (n = 231). The factor analytic results showed a four-factor model of the scale data which supported the scale’s original factor structure but marked differences were found in terms of the relationships between items and factors (items had moved to different scales). Based on the EFA, the scales were renamed to better reflect the meaning of each factor, but the two main constructs of deep and surface approach remained the same. In the crossvalidation study, the results of the CFA suggested that out of three structural models, the best fit was achieved by a first-order four-factor model. Explanation of the Malay language R-SPQ-2F re-specified factor structure for Malaysian pre-service teachers are discussed as it is important that researchers do not blindly import measures used in another culture without adaptation. Included are implications for the Malay language R-SPQ-2F. |
| References |
1. Abd Rahman, F.I., & Scaife, J.A. (2012). Pre-service
teachers’ development of pedagogic content knowledge: A multifaceted case study. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 20(3), 615 – 634.
2. Biggs, J.B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning
and Studying. Melbourne: Australian Council for
Educational Research.
3. Biggs, J.B. (1993). From theory to practice: a
cognitive systems approach. Higher Education Research and Development, 12(1), 73-85.
4. Biggs, J.B. (2001). Enhancing learning: a matter
of style or approach? In R.J. Sternberg & L.F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles (pp. 73-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
5. Biggs, J.B., Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (2001). The
revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire:
R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(1), 133-149.
6. Brislin, R.W. (1980) Translation and content analysis
of oral and written materials. In H.C. Triandis & J.W. Berry (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 389-444). Boston: Allyn and Bacon
7. Case, J.M., & Gunstone, R. (2003). Going deeper
than deep and surface approaches: a study of students’ perceptions of time. Teaching in Higher Education, 8(1), 55-69.
8. Chan, K.Y., & Mousley, J. (2005). Using word problems in Malaysian mathematics education: Looking beneath the surface. In Chick, H.L. & Vincent, J.L (Eds.), Proceedings of the 29th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, PME,
Melbourne, pp. 217-225.
9. Chiou, G.L., & Liang, J.C. (2012). Exploring the
structure of science self-efficacy: A model built
on high school students’ conceptions of learning
and approaches to learning in science. The AsiaPacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 83-91.
10. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). Teacher education
and the American future. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 35-47.
11. Duff, A. (2004). The Revised Approaches to Studying
Inventory (RASI) and is use in management education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 56-72.
Floyd, F.J., & Widaman, K.F. (1995). Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 286-299.
12. Fryer, L.K., Ginns, P., Walker, R.A., & Nakao,
K. (2011). The adaptation and validation of the CEQ and the R-SPQ-2F to the Japanese tertiary environment. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 549-563. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02045.x
13. Gijbels, D., van de Watering, G., Dochy, F., &
van den Bossche, P. (2005). The relationship between students’ approaches to learning and the assessment of learning outcomes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20(4), 327-341.
14. Goh, P.S.C. (2008). Teaching Practices that Hinder
Deep Approaches to Learning of Twinning Program Students in Malaysia: a Qualitative Perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 17(1), 63-73.
15. Goh, P.S.C. (2012). The Malaysian Teacher Standards:
a look at the challenges and implications for teacher educators. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 11(2), 73-87.
16. Goh, P.S.C., & Matthews, B. (2011). Listening to the
concerns of student teachers in Malaysia during teaching practice. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 92-10.
17. Gordon, C., Simpson, T., & Debus, R. (2001). Improving quality learning in a pre-service teacher education program. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/01pap/gor01441.htm
18. Gorsuch, R.L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.).
Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
19. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K.A. (2006). A four-phase
model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
20. Hinkin, T.R. (1998). A brief tutorial on the development of measures for use in survey questionnaires.
Organisational Research Methods, 1(1), 104-
121.
21. Immekus, J.C., & Imbrie, R.K. (2010). A test and
cross-validation of the revised two-factor study
process questionnaire factor structure among western university students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(3), 495-510.
22. Justicia, F., Pichardo, M.C., Cano, F., Berbe’n, A.B
G., & De la Fuente, J. (2008). The revised twofactor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F): Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses at item level. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(3), 355-372.
23. Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y.P. (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: an investigation with confirmatory factor analysis
on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(3), 395-407.
24. Mahinay, R.A. (2014). Structural equation model on
learners’ conceptions of learning approaches to learning as predictors of physics self-efficacy. IAMURE International Journal of Education, 10(1), 111-123.
25. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976). On qualitative
differences in learning – I outcome and process.
British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1), 4-11.
26. Nunnally, J.C., & Berstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric
Theory (3rd ed.). Sydney: McGraw Hill.
27. Raja Musa, R.M.F., & Nik Yusoff, N.M.R. (2000,
November). The Malaysian smart school: a new hope for the philosophy of education. Paper presented at the International Conference on Teaching and Learning, Renaissance Palm Garden Hotel, Putrajaya, Malaysia.
28. Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to teach in Higher
Education (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Falmer. Roziana, S., Norashikin, M., Shah Rollah, A.W., Kamaruzzaman, A.R., Azizah, R., Maisarah, M.S., Hamidah, Ab. R., Siti Aisyah, P., Hamidah A.R., & Rosman, M.Y. (2011). A study on learning approaches used among postgraduate
students in research university. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3(2), 411-420.
29. Snedecor, G.W., & Cochran, W.G. (1989). Statistical
Methods (8th ed.). Iowa State University Press.
Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient
alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350-353.
30. Schumacker, R.E., & Lomax, R.G. (2004). A beginner’s guide to Structural Equation Modeling (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Seri Bunian, M., Goh, S.C., Mohd Yusof, H., &
Saemah, R. (2010). The Bahasa Melayu R-SPQ2F: A preliminary evidence of its validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7, 151–155.
32. Stes, A., De Maeyer, S., & van Petegem, P. (2013).
Examining the cross-cultural sensitivity of the Revised Two-Factor Process Quetionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) and validation of a Dutch version. PLOS ONE 8(1), 1-6.
33. The World Bank. (2013). Malaysia Economic Monitor, High Performing Education. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/
Worldbank/document/EAP/malaysia/Malaysia_
Economic_Monittor_High-Performing_ Education.pdf
34. UPSR and PMR may be abolished: Muhyiddin.
(2010, June20). The Star Online. Retrieved from http://thestar.com.my/news/story.
asp?sec=nation&file=/2010/6/20/nation/ 20100620133714
35. Wan Shahrazad, W.S., Wan Rafaei, A.B., Mariam
Adawiah, D., & Wan Samhanin, W.S. (2013). Reliability of second-order factor of a Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) among university students in
Malaysia. ASEAN Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 5(2), 1-13.
36. Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to
learning: a cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R.J.
Sternberg & L.F. Zhang (Eds), Perspectives on Thinking, Learning, and Cognitive Styles (pp. 165-195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37. World Bank: Worsening Obstacle to Malaysia’s high
income hopes. (2013, December 11). Malay Mail Online. Retrieved from http://www. themalaymailonline.com/malaysia/article/
world-bank-worsening-education-obstacle-tomalaysias-high-income-hopes. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |