A literature review on multimedia learning device for dyslexic students

Zamani Noor Ashafiqa, Abdul Aziz Nor Azah, Zukifl Che Zalina, Ibrahim Abu Bakar,

Full Text

Multimedia learning device is part of a new era in technology innovation learning culture. It is for students and implemented by teachers. In order to obtain the best results upon using multimedia learning device a comparisons among d-learning, e-learning and m-learning were conducted. Hence, it was decided that m-learning was an effective device to act as a tool for learning because it is efficient and easily accessed. Technologically advanced could act as a theory of multimedia learning which is presented to trigger learning process that will make dyslexia students more creative and enhance their critical thinking according to their ability. However, developing multimedia learning materials for this device is not as easy as it sounds, especially when the user is a special and unique person. Therefore, this research will illustrate the idea of designing device-based learning elements of multimedia specifically for dyslexic students. The aim of this research paper is to improve the knowledge via new strategies in teaching and learning skills by using a variety of approaches that is required in a multimedia learning device for dyslexic students. Thus, educators must need to create their own multimedia learning using the best devices in teaching and learning process, in which the use of multimedia is as an effective tool for dyslexic students.

References

1. Ronaldi Salleh, F.A. Umar, Rahman, F. Mokhtar wanting to have varied options to make learning tools and N.A. Alias, 2011. Menggunakan Animasi di dalam Instruksi Khas untuk Kanak-kanak Disleksia. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan Malaysia, 1(2):27-38. 2. Julina Johan, 2005. Kementerian rujuk. masih banyak pelajar gagal kuasai 3M, Utusan Malaysia .See also URL http:// ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan 3.The International Dyslexia ssociation 2010. Promoting Literacy Though Research, Education and Advocacy. See also URL http://www. . interys.org/ 4. Sariah Amirin, 2012. Perangkaan diterima Persatuan Disleksia Malaysia mendapati kanak-kanak yang menghidapi masalah pembelajaran sejak usia lima hingga enam tahun berpunca daripada masalah disleksia, Berita Harian. See also http://www.bharian.com.my/ 5. Peterson, R.L. and B.F. Pennington, 2012. Developmental dyslexia. The Lancet, 379(9830): 1997-2007. 6. Nordin Ahmad, 2005. 350,000 murid sekolah rendah alami Disleksia”. Utusan Malaysia, 17 December 2005.p. 2. See also URL understand. http://ww1.utusan.com.my/utusan/ 7. Moeini, H., 2010. Strategies and Principles in Using Educational Technology for Teaching Students with Learning Disabilities. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp: 2814-2821). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). 8. Fadilahwati Abdul Rahman, Fattawi Mokhtar and Ronaldi Saleh Umar, 2010. Usability Testing on Interactive Multimedia Learning Object for Dyslexic Children: Proceeding of 5th International Conference on e-Learning, 12-13 July 2010. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. 9. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Disorders and Stroke. 10. Siegel, L.S. and K. Reed, 2006. Cognitive architectures for multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 41 (2): 87-98 11. Darcy Ann Umphred, Rolando T. Lazaro, Margaret Roller and Gordon Burton, 2013. Neurological Rehabilitation (6 ed.). Elsevier Health Sciences. pp: study. 383. US America 12. Handler, S.M. and W.M. Fierson, 2011. Section on Ophthalmology; Council on Children with Disabilities; American Academy of Ophthalmology; American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus; American Association of Certified Orthoptists. Learning disabilities, dyslexia and vision. Pediatrics, 127(3): e818-e856. 13. Kooij J.J. Sandra, 2013. Adult ADHD diagnostic assessment and treatment (3 ed.). London: Springer. pp: 83. 14. American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). American Psychiatric Pub, United State of American. 15. Elias, T., 2011. Universal instructional design principles for mobile learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Learning, 12(2): 143-156. 16. Parette Jr, H.P., J. Hourcade and C. Blum, 2011. Using animation in Microsoft PowerPoint to enhance engagement and learning in young learners with developmental delay. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(4): 58. 17. Bradford, J., (n.d.). 2016. Designing web pages for dyslexic readers. See also URL http://www.dyslexiaparent.com/mag35.html. 18. Mayer, R.E., 2005. Principles for reducing extraneous processing in multimedia learning: Coherence, signaling, redundancy, spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity principles. The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, pp: 183-200. 19. Murphy, M., A.N. Woo, M. Nichols and J. Schipper, 2001. Geographical position/image digital recording and display system. U.S. Patent No. 6,282,362. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 20. Subrahmanyam, K. and P. Greenfield, 2008. Online communication and adolescent relationships. The Future of Children, 18(1): 119-146. 21. Georgiev, T., E. Georgieva and A. Smrikarov, 2004. M-learning-a New Stage of ?-Learning. In International Conference on Computer Systems and Distributed Technologies-CompSysTech, 4(28): 1-4. 22. Kukulska-Hulme, A., 2009. Will mobile learning change language learning?. ReCALL, 21(02): 157-165. 23. Stockwell, G., 2007. Vocabulary on the move: Investigating an intelligent mobile phone-based vocabulary tutor. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20(4): 365-383.