UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
This article discusses the preservation methodology of South Korean intangible cultural heritage through the case of the ‘Cultural Heritage Protection System’ launched in 1962. Through this system, fifty-seven kinds of intangible cultural properties have been officially preserved. This research examines the reconstructing methodologies of five traditional mask dance dramas, t’alch’ums, through literature review and interviews with performers from the Cultural Heritage Protection System. This article will benefit scholars and students in the performing arts seeking the effective methodologies in recovering original versions of ephemeral dance and theatre. |
References |
1. Blau, H. (1982). Take Up The Bodies: Theater at the Vanishing Point. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
2. Cho, T. I. (1979). T’alch’umŭi Yŏksawa Wŏnri [History and Principle of T’alch’um]. Hongsungsa.
3. Franko, M. (1993). Repeatability, Reconstruction and Beyond. In Dance as Text: Ideologies of the Baroque Body (pp. 133-152). CUP Archive.
4. Hahoe Byulsingut Preservation Society (2007). Hahoe Byulsingut Script. Hahoe Byulsingut Preservation Society: Han-Bit.
5. Hodson, M. (1996). Nijinsky’s Crime against Grace : Reconstruction Score of the Original Choreography for Le Sacre Du Printemps. Stuyvesant NY: Pendragon Press.
6. Jang, J. G. (2011). Hankuk Minsok Chonghapchosaŭi Kihoekkwa Kŭ Kyŏngwi [Plan and Process for National Folk Arts Contest]. In Hankuk Minsok Chonghapchosaŭi Sŏngkwawa
Minsokwa Minsokhakchŏk Ŭimi (pp. 10-25). Research Laboratory of Intangible Cultural Property at National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage.
7. Jung, S. J. (2008). Muhyŏng Munhwajaeŭi T’ansaeng [The Birth of Intangible Cultural Properties]. Sŏul-si: Yŏksa Pip’yŏngsa. Korean Cultural Heritage Research Laboratory in Chungang University (Eds.) (2011). The Review
about Management Plan of Important Intangible Cultural Properties. Cultural Heritage Administration.
8. Lee, D. H. (2001). Yŏnkŭk [Traditional Theatre]. In Hankuk Ŭi Chŏnt’ong Yesul (pp. 151-246). Sŏul : Han’guk Munhwajae Poho Chaedan.
9. Lee, G. T. (n.d.). Chiyŏkpyŏl Chosasŏngkwaŭi Ŭiŭi [The Result and Meaning of Regional Investigation]. In Hankuk Minsok Chonghapchosaŭi Sŏngkwawa Minsokwa Minsokhakchŏk Ŭimi (pp. 28-56). Research Laboratory of Intangible Cultural Property at National Research Institute of Cultural Heritage].
10. Lim, J. H. (1996). T’alch’umaë Hyŏngsanhwa toen “Sŏng” ŭi Minchungchŏk Insikkwa Pyŏnhyŏkchŏk Sŏngkyŏk [Folk Cognition and Revolutionary Features of “Sex” Expressed in the Korean Traditional Mask Play]. Korean Society for Cultural Anthropology 29(2),35–96.
11. Minister of Culture and Public Information (1970). Munhwajae Gwanriguk [The Office of Cultural Properties]. Seoul: Munhwa Gongbobu.
12. Schneider, R. (1965). Theatre Criticism. The Tulane Drama Review, 9(3), 22-24.
13. Schneider, R. (1985a). Between Theatre and Anthropology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Schneider, R. (2012b). Performance Remains. In Perform, Repeat, Record: Live Art in History (pp.
137-150). The University of Chicago Press.
15. Siegel, M. B. (1968). At the Vanishing Point: A Critic Looks at Dance, New York: Saturday Review
Press.
16. Taylor, Diana. (2008) Performance and Intangible Cultural Heritage. In The Cambridge Companion to Performance Studies (pp. 91-104). New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. Tongyeong Ogwangdae Preservation Society (n.d.). Tongyeong Ogwangdae Script. Tongyeong Ogwangdae Preservation Society. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |