UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
This recent decade shows a very clear tendency among the national theater artists to display political events in the arts archive of post-modernism Malay theater. In line with the development and change of the political climate taking place in Malaysia today, this paper work questions the post-modernism Malay theater arts that is also playing the role as the medium,tool and the subject of ‘power and dominance’ of theater artists by encode the political ideology and propaganda in the performance. Thus, a qualitative study is carried out to identify the ideology and aesthetics form that have been encode in the performance sign system of post-modernist Malay theater today. The focus of this study rests on the themes of political commentary and the form of aesthetics produced in a post modern malay theater performance. The study methodology employs the qualitative approach by pertaining the postsemiotic theory and the whitmore theater signal system model as the theoretical framework of the study. The significance of this study verifies the study hypothesis that there is the existence of the local counter culture movement that manifests various political issues and turmoil in the post-modernist Malay theater performance. The results of the study are able to synthesise the political commentary of the political events surrounding the Malay society in Malaysia created by the theater director and his creative team on the Malay post modern theater performances. |
References |
1. Hussain, H. (2000). “Teater Politik di Filipina: Tempiasan Dari Barat ke Timur”. Jurnal Seni Persembahan. Tirai Panggung. Kuala Lumpur, Universiti Malaya. Vol 3, No 70. 15-20
2. Hogde, F. (2000). Play Directing. Analysis, Communication and Style. Fifth Edition. USA: University of Texas.
3. Ismail, G. (2013). “Suara-Suara Kecil” Laungan Hatta Azad Khan dan Strategi Naratifnya:Penilaian Kritis Terhadap Drama Pentas Hatta dari Perspektif Sosiologi
Sastera.(Unpublised Doctoral Desertation). Universiti Sains Malaysia. Penang. Malaysia.
4. Jeffrey, M. D. (2008). Stone Tower. The Political Theatere of Arthur Miller. USA: The University Of Michigan Press.
5. Kerstin, S. (2005). The Theater Of Transformation: Postmodernism in America Drama. New York: Rodopi
6. Kelleher, J. (2009). Theater and Politics. USA: Palgrave McMillian.
7. Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
8. Othman, M. N. Z. (2012). “Diskriminasi dalam pasaran buruh: kajian kes di sektor swasta”.Prosiding Perkem VII. Bangi. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Vol 2(2012).922-932.
9. Ramli, M. I. (2016, May 2017.) “Political activism through theatre a reflection of fifteen years_bangsar utama theatre group”. Retrieved from
https://www.academia.edu/20206162.
10. Sikana, M. (2006). Drama Melayu Tradisional, Moden dan Pascamoden. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka Kuala Lumpur.
11. Whitmore, J. (1997). Directing Postmodern Theater. Shaping Signification in Performances. USA: The University of Michigan Press. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |