1. Altınay Gazi, A., Altınay Aksal, F. & Menemenci Bahçelerli, N. (2013). Practice of Connectivism As Learning Theory: Enhancing Learning Process Through Social Networking Site (Facebook)/Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences (http://jss.gantep.edu.tr) JSS 12(2) (2013) Technology Special Issue: 243-252. ISSN: 1303-0094 2. Bernsteiner, R., Ostermann, H., & Staudinger, R. (2008). Facilitating e-learning with social software: Attitudes and usage from the student’s point of view. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 3(3), 16-33. 3. Campbell, T., Wang, S., Hsu, H.-Y., Duffy, A., & Wolf, P. (2010). Learning with web tools, simulations, and other technologies in science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(5), 505-511. doi:10.1007/ s10956-010-9217-8 4. Candy, P. C. (1991). Self-Direction for Lifelong Learning. A Comprehensive Guide to Theory and Practice. Jossey-Bass, 350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104-1310. 5. Crook, C., Cummings, J., Fisher, T., Graber, R., Harrison, C., & Lewin, C. (2008). Web 2.0 technologies for learning: The current landscape-opportunities, challenges and tensions. 6. Dabbagh, N. (2007). The online learner: Characteristics and pedagogical implications.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 217- 226. 7. Dabbagh, N., & Reo, R. (2011). Back to the future: Tracing the roots and learning affordances of social software. Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 8. Downes, S. (2010). Learning networks and connective knowledge. In H. Yang & S. Yuen (Eds.), Collective intelligence and e-learning 2.0: Implications of web-based communities and networking (pp. 1-26). Hershey, PA: IGI Global. 9. Drexler, W., Baralt, A., & Dawson, K. (2008). The teach Web 2.0 consortium: A tool to promote educational social networking and Web 2.0 use among educators. Educational Media International, 45(4), 271-283. doi:10.1080/09523980802571499 10. Du, F. (2012). Using study plans to develop self-directed learning skills: Implications from a pilot project. College Student Journal, 46(1), 223-232. 11. Dunlap, J. C., & Lowenthal, P. R. (2011). Learning, unlearning, and relearning: Using Web 2.0 technologies to support the development of lifelong learning skills. 12. Fein, M. L. (2014). Redefining higher education: How self-direction can save colleges. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction. 13. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F.L. (1982). two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 440-452. 14. Fornell, C., & Cha, J. (1994). Partial least squares. Advanced methods of marketing research, 407(3), 52-78. 15. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D.F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable and measuremenr error Journal of Marketing Research, 34(2), 161-188. 16. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., & Boudreau, M.C. (2000). Structural equation modelling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communication of the Association fo Information Systems, 4(7), 2-77. 17. Glud, L. N., Buus, L., Ryberg, T., Georgsen, M., & Davidsen, J. (2010). Contributing to a learning methodology for Web 2.0 learning—Identifying central tensions in educational use of Web 2.0 technologies. In L. Dirckinck-Holmfeld, V. Hodgson, C. Jones,M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp.934–942). Retrieved from: http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fss/organisations/netlc/past/nlc2010/abstracts/PDFs/N%C3%B8rgaa rd%20Glud.pdf 18. Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take “now”? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246 259.doi:10.3102/0013189X09336671 19. Hair, J. F., Ringle, C.M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-151. 20. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, california: SAGE Publications. 21. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., & Sinkovics, R. (2009). The use of Partial Least Squares path modeling in International Marketing. International Marketing, 20, 277-319. 22. Marcoulides, G.A., Chin, W.W., & Saunders, C. (2009). A critical look at Partial Least Square Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 33(1), 171-175. 23. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, J. W. (2008). The three P‘s of pedagogy for the networked society: Personalization, participation, and productivity. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 10–27. Retrieved from http://www.isetl.org/ijtlhe/pdf/IJTLHE395.pdf 24. Meyer, B., Haywood, N., Sachdev. D., & Faraday S. (2008). Independent Learning Literature Review. (Research Report No. DCSF-RR05). Retrieved from Learning and Skills Network 25. Rouse, A.C., & Corbitt, B. (2008). There's SEM and "SEM": A critique of the use of PLS regression in Information System researchAIS. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 19th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Christchurch, New Zealand. 26. Ryberg, T., Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., & Jones, C. (2010a). Catering to the needs of the "digital natives" or educating the "net generation"? In M. J. W. Lee & C. McLoughlin (Eds.), Web 2.0- Based E-Learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching (pp. 301–318). Hershey, PA: IGI Global 27. Sinclair, B. (2001). What do we mean by learner independence and wrestling with a jelly: The evaluation of learner autonomy. Workshops given at the Higher Colleges of Technology, United Arab Emirates. 28. Torkzadeh, G., Koufteros, X., & Pflughoeft, K. (2003). Confirmatory analysis of computer selfefficacy. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(2), 263-275. 29. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G., & van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hiererchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS Quarterly,33(1), 177-195