UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Full Text : |
Problems in reading among children with special needs is an issue of concern by teachers and parents. Reading activities should start as early as possible since the efficiency of reading is a basic requirement in the learning process. Reading instruction using multimedia as a tool for teaching and learning process has been commonly implemented in today classrooms. Various methods have been use in schools and at home to overcome this problem. Thus, the development of useful digital learning tools to support effective language learning is a critical issue in the educational field especially in learning Malaylanguage. With the rapid growth of internet technologies and easy access to information, the field of digital learning has stimulated innovation and diversified developments to promote learning performance during learning process. However, most guidance systems neglect to consider the level of difficulty and recommended materials do not fully utilize portfolio features of learners incorporated into personalized learning activities. Therefore, this article proposed a diagram on mechanism which utilizes data of a learning portfolio and simultaneously considers information regarding the degree of relational reading difficulty during diagnostic test. |
References |
1. Abdul Fuad Mohamed Salim & Izani Hj Daud (2010). The effectiveness of the application of ICT in improving
the reading skills of students: a case study. Journal of Language, 10(2), 223-241.
2. Azida, N. & Bilal, M. (2013). Personalized learning and learning style among upper secondary school students.
Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 103(2007), 710–716.
3. Biancarosa, G. & Griffiths, G.G. (2012). Technology tools to support reading in the digital age. The Future of Children, 22(2), 138-160.
4. Butterworth, Brain, Dyscalculia Guidance: Helping pupils with Specific learning difficulties in maths, David Fulton Publication, 2004.
5. Chau, M. (2008). The effects of electronic books designed for children in education. Essays of the Design of Electronic Text, 1(1), 1 – 12.
6. Ekwelem, V. O., V. N. Okafor & S. C. Ukwoma. (2011). Preservation of Cultural Heritage: The Strategic Role
of the Library and Information Science Professionals in South East Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice
(e-journal), Paper 562.
7. Fernández-lópez, Á., Rodríguez-fórtiz, M. J., & Rodríguez-almendros, M. L. (2013). Computers & Education
Mobile learning technology based on iOS devices to support students with special education needs. Computers
& Education, 61, 77–90.
8. Forum, C. (2016). and Alternative Communication for Students With Autism : Manual Signs , Graphic
Symbols , and Voice Output, 34(July 2003), 203–216.
9. Frith, U. (1986). A developmental framework for developmental dyslexia. Annals ofDyslexia, 36, 69–81.
10. Hall, W., & Keynes, M. (2011). The net generation and digital natives: implications for higher education The
Net Generation and Digital Natives Implications for Higher Education.
11. Holmes, W., Reid, D. & Dowker, A. (2012). Early intervention to prevent long-term literacy difficulties: the case of Catch Up Literacy. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1-7.
12. Is, W., & Learning, P. (2010). Personalized Learning and Vocational Education and Training, 391–396.
13. Giarratano, J., Riley, G., Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition. Amazon Book: Online.
14. Lokman Abd Wahid. (2009). ICT Integration and Pedagogical Content Knowledge [PKP (PCK)]: Towards a
more effective language acquisition. Pedagogy Malay Regional Convention, 263-285.
15. Mahzan Arshad. 2003. Pendidikan literasi bahasa Melayu: Satu pendekatan bersepadu. Kuala Lumpur. Utusan
Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.
16. McKenna, M.C dan Zucker, T.A. (2009). Use of electronic storybooks in reading insruction.Dlm Bus,A. G.
(Peny.), Multimedia and literacy development : improving achievement for young learners (ms. 254-272). New
York: Routledge.
17. Nor Zakiah Arif & Nurhani Idris. (2012) Penggunaan ICT bagi meningkatkan kemahiran membaca murid.
Seminar Bahasa Melayu, MLCS Bishan, Singapura.
18. Perfetti, C.A., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Verhoeven, C. Elbro, &P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. Pfost, M., Hattie, J., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2013). Individual differences in reading development: A review of 25 years of empirical research on Matthew effects in reading.
20. Richter, T., Isberner, M. -B., Naumann, J., & Kutzner, Y. (2012). Process-oriented assessmentof reading skills in primary school children. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 26, 313-331.
21. Roskos, K. & Brueck, J. (2009). The eBook as a learning object in an online world. In Bus, A. G. Multimedia and literacy development: Improving achievement for young learners. New York: Routledge.
22. Vellutino, F. (1979). Dyslexia: Theory and research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Yu Qian, Xiuxi Li, Yanrong Jiang, Yanqin Wen ,. An expertsystem for real-time failure diagnosis of complex
chemical processes,Expert Systems with Applications, 24, 2003, pp. 425-432.
24. Zulkifley Hamid (2006). Aplikasi Psikolinguistik Dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Bahasa. Selangor: PTS
Profesional |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |