UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||
| Full Text : |
| Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate how the quality of teachers based on education and training provided under new reform policies in Malaysia affects their earnings outcomes. The study conducted a benefit and returns analysis guided by human capital theory. Design/methodology/approach – The study used survey research methods to investigate human capital formation in the teaching profession using teachers’qualifications, benefits and private rate of returns as key variables in the estimation. Findings – Earnings and experience levels were highly correlated with teachers’ education levels, as suggested by human capital theory. The private rate of returns in earnings for each additional year of schooling of teachers was found to lie between 3 and 4 per cent per year. Discrepancies were apparent in teachers’ qualifications and licensure levels regionally and at academic levels, as expected. These correlated with earning levels. Practical implications – Improvements in teachers’ salary and employment opportunities will attract higher quality graduates to the teaching profession. Teachers’ annual earnings in Malaysia are comparable to other public sector and private professional jobs in the nation but lag far behind those of the world’s top education systems. Increasing teachers’ earnings will attract better qualified teachers. Policymakers could address these issues. Originality/value – This paper demonstrates the utility of economic analyses in terms of earnings returns, to evaluate the Malaysian policy of upgrading teachers’ qualifications as a mechanism to improve the overall quality of schooling. Such studies are rare but needed to understand the benefits and returns of policy-driven teacher education and training investments. This study provides new evidence of schooling returns using a recent, national data set |
| References |
1. Barber, M. and Mourshed, M. (2007), How the World’s Best-Performing School Systems Come out on Top, McKinsey and Company, London. 2. Blau, D.M. (1986), “Self-employment, earnings, and mobility in peninsular Malaysia”, World Development, Vol. 14 No. 7, pp. 839-852. 3. Card, D. (1999), “The causal effect on education and earning”, in Ashenfelter, O. and Card, D. (Eds), Handbooks of Labour Economics, Elsevier, North-Holland, pp. 1801-1863. 4. Card, D. (2001), “Estimating the returns to schooling: progress on some persistent econometrics problem”, Econometrica, Vol. 69 No. 5, pp. 1127-1160. 5. Chung, T.P. (2003), “Returns to education: updates for Malaysia”, Applied Economics Letters, Vol. 10, pp. 837-841. 6. Chung, T.P. (2004), “The returns to education and training: evidence from the Malaysian family life surveys”, Pacific Economic Review, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 103-116. 7. Gallup, J.L. (1997), “Ethnicity and earnings in Malaysia”, Development Discussion Paper No. 592, Harvard Institute for International Development. 8. Hanushek, E.A. (2011), “The economic value of higher teacher quality”, Economics of Education Review, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 466-479. 9. Hanushek, E.A. (2016), “School human capital and teacher salary policies”, Journal of Professional Capital and Community, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 23-40. 10. Hoerr, O.D. (1973), “Education, income, and equity in Malaysia”, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 247-273. 11. Kraft, M.A. and Papay, J.P. (2014), “Can professional environments in schools promote teacher development? Explaining heterogeneity in returns to teaching experience”, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 476-500. 12. Lee, K.H. (1980), “Education, earnings, and occupational status in Malaysia”, PhD thesis, Department of Economics, London School of Economics and Political Science, University of London, London. 13. McKenzie, P., Rowley, G., Weldon, P.R. and Murphy, M. (2011), “Staff in Australia’s schools 2010: main report on the survey”, available at: http://research.acer.edu.au/tll_misc/1 14. Malaysia (2001), “8th Malaysian Plan 2006-2010”, Ministry of Finance, Kuala Lumpur. 15. Malaysia (2006), “9th Malaysian Plan 2006-2010”, Ministry of Finance, Kuala Lumpur. 16. Malaysia (2011), “10th Malaysian Plan 2006-2010”, Ministry of Finance, Kuala Lumpur. 17. Mazumdar, D. (1981), The Urban Labor Market and Income Distribution: A study of Malaysia, Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 18. Mincer, J. (1974), Schooling Experience and Earning”, Columbia University Press, New York, NY. 19. Ministry of Education (2013), “Malaysian education blueprint 2013-2025”, Ministry of Education Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. 20. Mourshed, M., Chijioke, C. and Barber, M. (2010), How the World’s Most Improved School Systems Keep Getting Better, McKinsey and Company, London. 21. OECD (2012), Education at a Glance 2012: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, available at: http://dx. doi.org/10.1787/eag-2012-en 22. Papay, J.P. and Kraft, M.A. (2015), “Productivity returns to experience in the teacher labor market: methodological challenges and new evidence on long-term career improvement”, Journal of Public Economics, available at: http://scholar.harvard.edu/ files/mkraft/files/jpubec_-_returns_ to_experience_manuscript_-_r2.pdf?m1424877117 23. Ramlee, I. and Marinah, A. (2013), “Estimating the returns of self-employed and salaried workers in Malaysia”, Journal of Contemporary Issues Thought, Vol. 3, pp. 26-36. 24. Rice, J.K. (2013), “Learning from experience? Evidence on the impact and distribution of teacher experience and the implications for teacher policy”, Education Finance and Policy, Vol.8 No.3,pp. 332-348. 25. UNESCO (2013), “Malaysia: education policy review”, Abridged Report, UNESCO, Paris, 1 May. 26. Weiss, A. (1995), “Human capital vs signalling explanations of wages”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 133-154. 27. Willis, R.J. (1986), “Wages determinants: a survey and reinterpretation of human capital earnings functions”, in Eshenfelter, O. and Layard, R. (Eds), Handbooks of Labor Economics, Vol. 1, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V, North Holland, pp. 525-602. 28. Zainizam, Z. (2013), “Returns to education: what does over-education play?”, Proceeding PERKEM VIII, Jilid, Vol. 1, pp. 266-278.Further reading 29. Belman, D. and Heywood, J.S. (1997), “Sheepskin effects by cohort: implications of job matching is a signalling model”, Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 49, pp. 623-637. 30. Harris, D. and Sass, T. (2011), “Teacher training, teacher quality, and student achievement”, Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 95 Nos 7/8, pp. 798-812. 31. Lee, K.H. and Sivananthiran, A. (1992), “Employment, occupational mobility and earnings in the Kuala Lumpur Urban labour market with special reference to women in the manufacturing sector”,Report submitted to the International Labor Organisation/Asian Regional Team for Employment Promotion (ARTEP). 32. Patrinos, H.A. and Sakellariou, C. (2004), “Schooling and labor market impacts of a natural policy experiment, World Bank Policy Research”, Working Paper 3459, World Bank. 33. Psacharopoulos, G. (1994), “Returns to investment in education: a global update”, World Development, Vol. 22 No. 9, pp. 1325-1343. 34. Psacharopoulos, G. and Patrinos, H.A. (2002), “Returns to investment in education: a further update”, World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper 2881, Latin America and the Caribbean Region, World Bank. 35. Psacharopoulos, G. and Patrinos, H.A. (2004), “Returns to investment in education: a further update”, Education Economics, Vol. 12 No. 2. 36. Sakellariou, C. (2003), “Returns to formal and technical education in Singapore”, Education Economics, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 73-87. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |