UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| Traditional approaches are still dominant in virtually all construction projects in Malaysia. This was highlighted as the main barrier for further developing the Industrialised Building System (IBS) construction process. Indeed, traditional approaches implemented in IBS have been recognised by several studies as failing to support effective work teams when team processes are disconnected from each other (fragmented), thus failing to produce an effective communication process. Additionally, IBS construction involves large numbers of teams with different expertise and from different organisations, all of which are handled by different numbers of management processes, for instance in planning, manufacturing, transportation, positioning and assembling the structures that involve minimal additional site work. With the increasing demand in building bigger and better buildings and structures, construction projects are becoming more complex to manage by project managers, as they have to manage every single phase by coordinating and monitoring the entire project while at the same time, consider different values and interests from every project team members. Hence, high intensity levels of communication processes involving project team members are importance in order to produce high quality information in decision-making process and conveying instructions to all team members. Regarding the issues of communication practices inside construction projects, this paper explores how communication is applied by the project team management in managing different construction stages inside an IBS construction project with several of stakeholders from diverse locations, and different cultural and organisational backgrounds. Even though a few studies had highlighted communication barriers in the construction field, only a few investigated virtual team practices in the IBS construction industry, especially in Malaysian construction. In this context, preliminary interviews were conducted on several project managers with vast experience in managing IBS construction projects. The content analysis method was used as the technique to ensure the gathered data were comprehensively and accurately analysed. The results showed that most project teams communicated virtually within and among teams for the duration of the project implementation, which the phenomenon is resulting from modern organisational form. There are five categories associated with virtual team work environment, namely distributed area, open discussion, team attitude, communication technology, and reliability of task, all of which are exceptionally pertinent in virtual team, compared to traditional team, work interaction practices. |
| References |
1. Abadi, M. (2005). Issues and challenge in communication within design teams in the construction industry. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manchester, UK. 2. Affendi, M., Pozin, A., Nasrun, M., Nawi, M., & Romle, A. R. (2016). Effectiveness of Virtual Team for Improving Communication Breakdown in IBS Project Delivery Process. Int. J Sup. Chain. Mgt, 5(4), 121–130. 3. Akmam Syed Zakaria, S., Gajendran, T., Skitmore, M., & Brewer, G. (2017). Key factors influencing the decision to adopt industrialised building systems technology in the Malaysian construction industry: an inter-project perspective. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2007(April), 1–19. 4. Baskerville, R., & Nandhakumar, J. (2007). Activating and perpetuating virtual teams: Now that we’re mobile, where do we go?. Professional Communication, IEEE Transactions on, 50(1), 17–54. 5. Chatfield, A. T., Shlemoon, V. N., Redublado, W., & Darbyshire, G. (2014). Creating Value Through Virtual Teams: a Current Literature Review. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 18(3), 257–269. 6. Chen, C., & Messner, J. I. (2010). A Recommended Practices System for a Global Virtual Engineering Team. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 6(January 2015), 207–221. 7. Chinowsky, P. S., & Rojas, E. M. (2003). Virtual Teams: Guide to Successful Implementation. Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(3), 98–106. CIDB. (2009). Malaysian Construction Research Journal, 4(1). 8. CIDB Malaysia. (2012). CIDB Malaysia Annual Report 2012. Dainty, A., Moore, D., & Murray, M. (2006). Communication in construction: Theory and practice. Routledge. 9. Den Otter, A., & Emmitt, S. (2007). Exploring effectiveness of team communication: Balancing synchronous and asynchronous communication in design teams.Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 14(5), 408–419. 10. Duarte, D. L., & Snyder, N. T. (2006). Mastering virtual teams: Strategies, tools, and techniques that succeed. John Wiley & Sons. 11. Evbuomwan, N. F. ., & Anumba, C. . (1998). An integrated framework for concurrent lifecycle design and construction. Advances in Engineering Software, 29(7–9), 587–597. 12. Fuller, R. M. (2008). Theory and Review Media , Tasks , and Communication Processes : Gabriele Piccoli Anne Powell Blake Ives. (2004). Virtual teams: team control structure, work processes, and team effectiveness. Information Technology & People, 17(4), 359–379. 13. Guss, C. L. (1996). Virtual Teams, Project Management Processes and the Construction Industry. CIB REPORT, 253–264. 14. Hosseini, M. R., & Chileshe, N. (2013a). Global virtual engineering teams (GVETs): A fertile ground for research in Australian construction projects context. International Journal of Project Management, 31(8), 1101–1117. 15. Hosseini, M. R., & Chileshe, N. (2013b). State Of Research On Global Virtual Teams (Gvts): A Comparison Between Construction And Other Industries. Creative Construction Conference. 16. Karlsen, J. T. (2002). Project stakeholder management. Engineering Management Journal, 14(4), 19–24. 17. Kaur, S., Arif, M., & Akre, V. (2016). Social Media: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. Conference on E- Business, E-Services and E-Society, 9844(September), 419–429. 18. Lim, Y.-W., Eka, S., Fatemeh, S., & Noor Fazlenawati, M. N. . (2016). Building Information Modelling for Building Energy Efficiency Evaluation Integration with Green Building Index (GBI) in Malaysia Yaik-Wah. 4th Annual International Conference on Architecture and Civil Engineering (ACE 2016), (Ace), 42–48. 19. Lipnack, J., & Stamps, J. (1997). Virtual teams: Reaching across space, time, and organizations with technology. New York: John-Wiley. 20. Mohd Nasrun Mohd Nawi, Angela Lee, K. A. M. K. and Z. A. H. (2012). A Critical literature review on the concept of team integration in Industrialised Building System (IBS) project. Malaysian Construction Research Journal, ISSN, 9(Critical Literature Review on the Concept of Team Integration in Industrialised Building System (IBS) Construction Project). 21. Mohd Nawi, M. N., Lee, A., Azman, A., Anuar, K., & Kamar, M. (2014). Fragmentation issue in Malaysian Industrialised Building System ( IBS ) PROJECTS 2 . IBS as an Alternative Solution. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology, 9(1), 97–106. 22. Munkvold, B. E., & Zigurs, I. (2007). Process and technology challenges in swift-starting virtual teams. Information & Management, 44(3), 287–299. 23. Ruuska, K. (1996). Project Communication. In In Proceedings of the IPMA 96 World Congress on Project Management, Paris, France (pp. 67–76). 24. Senaratne, S., & Ruwanpura, M. (2016). Communication in construction: A management perspective through case studies in Sri Lanka. Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 12(1), 3–18. 25. Sushil K. Prasad Harrick M.Vin Sartaj Sahni Mahadeo P. Jaiswal Bundit Thipakorn (Eds.). (2010). Information Systems , Technology and Management. 4th International Conference, ICISTM 2010. 26. Tsai, M. K. (2009). Improving communication barriers for on-site information flow: An exploratory study. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 23(3), 323–331. 27. Wikforss, Ö. ̈, & Löfgren, A. (2007). Rethinking communication in construction. Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, 12(April), 337–345. 28. Zhang, Y., Fang, Y., Wei, K. K., & Chen, H. (2010). Exploring the role of psychological safety in promoting the intention to continue sharing knowledge in virtual communities. International Journal of Information Management, 30(5), 425–436. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |