UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : |
The objective of this study is to identify the Ely’s Variation (Conditions of Change) - 1999, which exists to support the integration of ICT. The sample consists of VAE major students - semester 5, 6, 7 and 8, who have attended the course. As a result of the fish bowl draw for choosing the population capable of governance, a total of 223 VAE students from 6 ITE in Peninsular Malaysia have been selected for this study. The respondents come from these institutes: 1) IPGK Bahasa Antarabangsa (9.0%), 2) IPGK Dato’ Razali Ismail (9.0%), 3) IPGK Raja Melewar (25.6%), 4) IPGK Pendidikan Teknik (9.9%), 5) IPGK Ilmu Khas (13.5%) and 6) IPGK Sultan Mizan (33.2%). From the 223 (100%) sets of questionnaires distributed, 213 (96%) sets have been successfully analysed. The study uses a questionnaire survey method. The questionnaires consist of 6 items (Demographic Information of Respondents) and 40 items (Ely terms, 1999). The reliability of the instruments for integrating ICT according to Ely’s requirements is 0.86. Data is analysed using Mean (M) and Standard Deviation (SD). The findings indicate the existence and support the integration of ICT through the T&L process. The 7 conditions specified above are of varying stages. The third term, which is the Resources Readiness, obtained (M = 2.37, SD = 0.73), indicating that the existence of this condition is somewhat less supportive of the integration of ICT. It can be concluded that the VAE students thought that they did not have sufficient resources to enable them to integrate ICT through the T&L process of Creative Multimedia in Visual Art Education courses in ITE. |
References |
1. Abet AA (2009). The commitment of visual art education teacher (minor) postgraduate teaching courses in the teaching of visual arts education in primary school. M.Sc. Thesis, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris, Malaysia. 2. Ely DP (1990). Condition that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovations. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 23(2): 298-305.https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1990.10781963 3. Ely DP (1999). New perspectives on the implementation of educational technology innovations. ERIC Document Reproductive Service No. ED 427 775. Available online at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED427775 4. Ertmer PA and Ottenbreit-Leftwich AT (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3): 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551 5. Maulan SB and Ibrahim R (2012). The teaching and learning of English for academic purposes in blended environment. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67: 561-570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.361 6. MOE (2012). Preliminary Report Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 – 2025. Ministry of Education, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 27: 1-268. 7. Nawawi MH (2005). Condition facilitating utilizing of instructional technology in higher education: A study of Universiti Putra Malaysia, instructional design, development and evaluation. Ph.D. dissertation, Syracuse University, New York, USA 8. Nompula Y (2012). An investigation of strategies for integrated learning experiences and instruction in the teaching of creative art subjects. South African Journal of Education, 32(3): 293-306. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v32n3a579 9. Umar IN and Jamiat N (2011). Trends of ICT research in teaching education: An analysis of the Malaysian instructional technology proceedings. Asia Pacific Journal of Educators and Education, 26(1): 1-14. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |