An exploration of English language teachers strategies for disciplining unauthorized behavior in Iranian public and private language schools

Vosough, Marjan

Abstract

In this article, an attempt was made to explore English language teachers’ strategies for disciplining unauthorized behavior (misbehavior) in public high schools and private language institutes. To this end, two sets of general and specific teacher strategies for disciplining misbehavior were surveyed in two successive stages. First, American Teacher Strategies Questionnaire from the Incredible Years Programs (IYP) incorporation (2012) was examined to decide on the most appropriate teacher techniques for general Class Management (CM) scheme; secondly, teacher interview logs were used to decide on the specific CM strategies, which were characteristic of language classes. Then, a researcher-developed questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale was constructed and distributed among some fifty-five Iranian teachers from public high schools and private language institutes in four large cities in Tehran, Isfahan, and Khorasan Razavi Provinces, and their responses were analyzed using Multinomial Logistic Regression method. The findings showed that only seven strategies could significantly differentiate language teachers' disciplining mannerism; three strategies in general CM and four strategies in specific CM for a language class were then interpreted. Finally, implications for discipline matters in formal and informal settings were critically discussed.

References

1. Ashton, K. (2018). Exploring teacher views of multi-level language classes in New Zealand secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 69, 104-118. 2. Brown, H. D. (2001a). Statistics Corner. Questions and answers about language testing statistics: Can we use the Spearman-Brown prophecy formula to defend low reliability? Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 4(3), 7-9. 3. Brown, H. D. (2001b). Teaching by principles. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education. 4. Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (3rd Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regents. 5. Butler, Y. G. (2011). The implementation of communicative and task-based language teaching in the Asia-Pacific region? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 31, 36-57. 6. Cox, C. B., & Boyson, R. (Eds.). (1975). Black papers: the right for education. London: Dent. 7. De Jong, R., van Tartwijk, J., Wubbles, T., & Verloop, N. (2013). Student teachers’ discipline strategies: Relations with self-images, anticipated student responses and pupil control orientation. Educational Studies, 39(5), 582-597. 8. DorBremme, D.W. (1990). Contextualization cues in the classroom: Discourse regulation and social control functions. Language in Society,19(3), 379-402. 9. Dreikurs, R., Cassel, P., & Ferguson, E. D. (2004). Discipline without tears: How to reduce conflict and establish cooperation in the classroom (Rev. ed.). Mississauga, Ontario: Wiley. 10. Education Bureau. (2014). Student Guidance and Discipline Services. Available at http://www.edbi.gov.hk/en/student-parents/student-guidance-discipline-services/overview/index.html. 11. George, D., & Mallory, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. 11.0 update (4th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon. 12. Glock, S., & Kleen, H. (2017). Gender and student misbehavior: Evidence from implicit and explicit measures. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 93-103. 13. Jinot, B. L. (2018). The Causes of a Lack of Discipline among Secondary School Learners in Mauritius. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 35. 14. Johnston, B. (2008). Values in English Language Teaching. UK: Lawrence Erlbaum. 15. Kang, D. M. (2013). EFL teachers’ language use for classroom discipline: A look at complex interplay of variables. System, 41(1), 149-163. 16. Khodarahmi, E., & Motallebi Nia, Z. (2014). EFL Teachers` classroom discipline strategies and learners` willingness to communicate in English inside the classroom. International Conference on Current Trends in ELT, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 98, 976-981. 17. Knight, P., & Pearl, A. (2000). Democratic Education and Critical pedagogy. The Urban Review, 32(3), 197-226. 18. Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. 19. Lefstein, A., Trachtenberg-Maslaton, R., & Pollak, I. (2017). Breaking out of the grips of dichotomous discourse in teacher post-observation debrief conversations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 418-428. 20. Lewis, R., Romi, S., Qui, X., & Katz, Y. J. (2008). Students’ reaction to classroom discipline in Australia, Israel, and China. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 715-724. 21. Markham, P.L. (1987). Classroom management in the secondary school foreign language class. System, 15(2), 217-220. 22. Margutti, P. (2006). 'Are you human beings?' Order and knowledge construction through questioning in primary classroom interaction. Linguistics and Education, 17(4), 313-346. 23. Margutti, P., & Marsh, A. P. (2011). The interactional management of discipline and morality in the classroom: An introduction. Linguistics and Education, 22, 305-309. 24. Martin, D. L. (1977). Your praise can smoother learning. Learning, 5(6), 43-51. 25. Mollica, A., & Nuessel, F. (1997). The good language learner and the good language teacher: A review of the literature. Mosaic, 4, 1-16. 26. Oplatka, I., & Atias, M. (2007). Gendered views of managing discipline in school and classroom. Gender and Education, 19(1), 41-59. 27. Rahimi, M., & Hosseini, K. F. (2012). EFL teachers’ classroom discipline strategies: the students’ perspective. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 309 – 314. DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.060. 28. Rahimi, M., & Asadollahi, F. (2012). On the relationship between Iranian EFL teachers’ classroom management orientations and teaching style. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 49-55. 29. Rose, L. C. & Gallup, A. M. (2004). Gallup poll of the public's attitudes toward public schools. The 36th Annual Phi Delta Kappa/ Available online: www.pdkintl.org/kappan/k0409pol.htm#exec. 30. Sadik, F., & Yalcin, O. (2018). Examination of the Views of High School Teachers and Students with Regard to Discipline Perception and Discipline Problems. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(2), 97-113. 31. Soares, D. (2007). Discipline problems in the EFL class: Is there a cure? Profile, 8, 41-58. 32. Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and social psychology review, 8(3), 220-247. 33. Sun, R. C. (2015). Teachers' experiences of effective strategies for managing classroom misbehavior in Hong Kong. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 94-103. 34. Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching, theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 35. Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Weinstein, C. S. (2006). Students‟ and teachers' perspectives on classroom management. In C. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.). Handbook for classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issue (pp. 181-220). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. 36. Zuckerman, J. T. (2007). Classroom management in secondary schools: A study of student teachers' successful strategies. American Secondary Education, 4-16. 37. Zuckerman, J. T. (Ed.). (2009). From Lesson Plans to Power Struggles, Grades 6 12: Classroom Management Strategies for New Teachers. Corwin Press