UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : |
Reflection and the promotion of reflective practice have been extensively emphasised in the teacher training and preparation programmes. In teacher education, many researchers have argued the importance of student teachers (STs) being able to develop their skills of reflection. This study was conducted to investigate the STs’ level of reflection during teacher clinical experience (TCE) (or variously known as the teaching practicum). It sought to analyse the level of reflection among STs from the Sultan Idris Education University (UPSI) in the current practice of reflective writing and after given exposure to the critical reflection manual (CRM) during TCE. The present study employed Van Manen’s (1977) three-stage model (technical, practical and critical) to determine the level of reflection based on STs’ self-reflection notes in their daily lesson plan books (for the current practice of reflective writing) and weekly reflective journal writings (for STs who were given exposure to the CRM). The research participants consisted of seven STs who were undergoing TCE from February to June 2014 (for the current practice of reflective writing) and eleven STs who were undergoing TCE from July to October 2015 (for STs who were given exposure to the CRM). Results of the analyses showed that STs were barely reflective, demonstrating very low level of reflection for the current practice of reflective writing while STs exhibited practical and critical levels of reflection after given exposure to the CRM. Interpretations of the results are presented and recommendations are discussed within the context of the study. |
References |
1. Aizan, Y., Walters, L. M., Ruzlan Md. Ali, Sarimah, S. A., & Walters, T. (2014). Reflecting on Malaysian teacher trainees’ journals. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11,1-21. 2. Bain, J. D., Ballantyne, R., Packer, J., & Mills, C. (1999). Using journal writing to enhance student teachers’ reflectivity during field experience placements. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 5(1), 51-73. 3. Boon, P. Y. (2002). Pelaksanaan kerja kursus berportfolio dalam kursus diploma perguruan Malaysia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Malaysia. 4. Boon, P. Y., & Wee, K. L. (2005). Facilitating reflection in education studies: A case study among pre service student teachers. Journal IPBA, 3(2), 1-16. 5. Calderhead, J., & Gates, P. (1993). Introduction. In J. Calderhead & P. Gates (Eds.),Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development. London, The Falmer Press. 6. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2004). Research methods in education (5th ed.). New York: Routledge. 7. Copeland, W. D., Birmingham, C., La Cruz, E. D., & Lewin, B. (1993). The reflective practitioner in teaching: Toward a research agenda. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(4), 347-359. 8. Etscheidt, S., Curran, C. M., & Sawyer, C. M. (2012). Promoting reflection in teacher preparation programs: A multilevel model. Teacher Education and Special Education, 35(1), 7-26. doi: 10.1177/0888406411420887 9. Grossman, R. (2008). Structures for facilitating student reflection. College Teaching, 57, 15-22. 10. Hanipah, H. (2004). Learning to be reflective from theory to practices: Malaysia experiences.Tanjong Malim, Perak: Penerbit Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. 11. Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching & Teacher Education, 11, 33-49. 12. Hoover, L. (1994). Reflective writing as a window on preservice teachers’ thought process.Teaching & Teacher Education, 10(1), 83-93. 13. Kennedy, J. (1993). Meeting the needs of teacher trainees on teaching practice. ELT Journal,47(2), 157-165. 14. McGee, A. (2008). Critical Reflections of action research used for professional development in a Middle Eastern Gulf State. Educational Action Research, 16(2), 253-250. 15. Merriam, S. B. (2007). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: Revised and expanded from case study research in education (Kindle ed.). San Francisco: JosseyBass Inc. 16. Munby, H., & Russell, T. (1989). Metaphor in the study of teachers’ professional knowledge.Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. 17. Nagendralingan, R., Aminah, A., & Othman, L. (2014). Teacher internship: A critical reflection on the interface between policy and practice in Malaysian teacher education. In J. C. D. Mora & K. Wood (Eds.), Practical knowledge in teacher education: Approaches to teacher internship programmes (pp. 19-30). London & New York: Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group. 18. National Institute of Education. (2010). A teacher education model for the 21st century (TE21): A report by the National Institute of Education (NIE), Singapore. Singapore: NIE, Strategic Planning and Corporate Services Department. 19. Nor Hasniza, I. (2006). Kajian pemikiran dan amalan refleksi di kalangan guru pelatih Sains Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. (Master’s thesis). Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor, Malaysia. 20. Ostorga, A. N. (2006). Developing teachers who are reflective practitioners: A complex process. Issues in Teacher Education, 15(2), 5-20. 21. Rahil, M., Zaidatol, A. L. P., Habibah, E., & Mohd Majid, K. (2004). The incorporation of thinking skills in the school curriculum. Kajian Malaysia, 22(2), 23-33. 22. Saemah, R., Khartijah, B, & Arbain, M. (2000). Pemikiran refleksi di kalangan guru pelatih semasa menjalani praktikum. Jurnal Penyelidikan Maktab Perguruan Islam, 1, 1-9. 23. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books. 24. Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco, CA: Kossey Bass. 25. Sparks-Langer, G. M., Simmons, J. M., Pasch, M., Colton, A., & Starko, A. (1990). Reflective pedagogical thinking: How can we promote it and measure it? Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 23-32. 26. Toh, W. S. (2001). Measuring practicum student teachers’ reflectivity: The reflective pedagogical thinking scale. Research Journal MPBL, 3, 18-27. 27. Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing and ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205-228. 28. Vaughan, J. C. (1990). Encouraging reflective practice in education. In Clift, Houston, & Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education: An analysis of issues and programs. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University. 29. Wong, Y. M., Mohd. Hassan, A., Rosnidar, M., & Syakirah, S. (2014). The analysis of UPSI teacher clinical experience in comparative perspective and suggestion for new teacher clinical experience structure. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(11), 14-23. 30. Wong, Y. M., Rosnidar, M., & Syakirah, S. (2015a). The challenge of producing progressive teachers in Malaysia: A case study of reflective writings among UPSI student teachers. GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 11(7), 21-32. 31. Wong, Y. M., Rosnidar, M., & Syakirah, S. (2015b). A case study on reflective writings among UPSI student teachers undergoing teacher clinical experience. Paper presented at Simposium Pengajian Siswazah UPSI–UPI 2015, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia, September 15, 2015. 32. Wong, Y. M., Rosnidar, M., & Syakirah, S. (2016). The use of critical reflection manual in writing reflective journal: A case study of Malaysian student teachers’ perceptions. GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 12(1), 8-18. 33. Zeichner, K. M. (1992). Conceptions of reflective teaching in contemporary US teacher education program reforms. In L. Valli (Ed.), Reflective teacher education. Albany, NY, State University of New York Press. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |