UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| The systemic approaches connect a set of interacting, functioning, and interdependent or elements with mutual relationships. The objective of this study is to analyze how students' cognitive ability profiles if measured using Chemistry Systemic Multiple Choices Questions (CSMCQs). This study was conducted by testing CSMCQs to the 157 students who studied with the usual learning approaches by teachers. Data collection technique were conducted using the objective test instruments consist of C1 to C6 cognitive abilitiy domains. Data were analyzed using descriptive percentage analysis. The results showed that students' cognitive ability is in the highest category. Based on these result, Chemistry Systemic Multiple Choice Questions (CSMCQs) can be used as an alternative learning evaluation instrument to develop students’ cognitive abilities. |
| References |
1. Boud, David. & Falchikov, N. Rethinking assessment in higher educational: learning for the longer term. Routledge, 2007, 3. 2. Lau, Shun. & Roeser, R. W. Cognitive abilities and process in high school students’ situational engagement and achievement in science. Routledge, 8(2), 139-162. 3. Tikkanen, G. & Aksela, M. Analysis of finnish chemistry matriculation examination questions according to cognitive complexity. Journals of uio, 2012, 8, (3), 258-286. 4. Lagowski, J.J. SATL. Learning theory, and the physiology of learning. 20th ICCE Proceeding, Mauritius, 2008, 3-8. 5. Priyambodo, E & Marfuatun. The development of systemic multiple choice questions (SMCQs) on redox and electrolyte-nonelectrolyte solution concepts in chemistry teaching and learning. Proceeding international seminar on mathematics, science, and computer science education, 2015, 92-95. 6. D Gabel. Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: a look to the future. The journal of strength & conditioning research, 1999, 76(4), 548. 7. Ivie, D.Stanley. Ausubel learning theory: an approach to teaching higher order thinking skills (education psychologist david paul ausubel). High school journal, 1998, 82(1), 35. 8. Al-Basharieh, Zeid. Systemic approach effect on achievement of tafila school students in science. International journal of humanities and social science, 2011, 3(1), 46-52. 9. Ghani, I. B., Ibrahim, N. H., Yahaya, N. A., & Surif, J. Enhancing students’ HOTS in laboratory educational activity by using concept map as an alternative assessment tool. Chemistry education research and practice, 2017, 18(4), 849–874. 10. Anderson, W. Lorin & Karthwohl, David, R. A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing. New York, Longman, 2001. 11. Fahmy, A. F. M., Lagowski, J. J. The use of a systemic approach in teaching and learning chemistry for the 21th century. Journal Published by Pure Appl. Chem., 1999, 5(71), 859-863. 12. Piaget, J. The psychology of intelligence. London, Routledge & Paul, 1950. 13. Sumintono, B and Widhiarso, W. Aplikasi model rasch untuk penelitian ilmu-ilmu sosial, Trimkom Publishing House, Bandung, 2013. 14. Medina, P. Analisis miskonsepsi siswa kelas X pada materi larutan elektrolit nonelektrolit serta reaksi oksidasi dan reduksi dalam pembelajaran kimia di SMA N Kota Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Teknologi Informasi, September 2015, 2(1), 6-8. 15. Rasch, D., Kubinger, K. D., & Yanagida, T. Using R and SPSS. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2011. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |