UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| Teaching practice can be regarded as that the practical section of teacher preparation programmes and it is valued as a critical component in the teacher education which enable preservice teachers to perform the theory acquired at their teacher training institution and put it into practice. During teaching practice, the pre-service teachers will be assessed by the institution supervisors and school mentors using formative and summative assessment to measure the development of their teaching skills as well as all the required skills to be a quality teacher according to the requirement by the teacher training institutions. The purpose of this paper is to study the assessment framework that available in the literature that can use to assess pre-service teacher during teaching practice placement in the school. This article reviewed current assessment literature on teaching practice assessment framework using a qualitative approach to analyse the result using 21st-century assessment fundamentals. Specifically, this study adopted scoping studies framework to examine the available knowledge regarding assessment framework to assess pre-service teacher during teaching practice placement. The findings from available literature reveal fourteen frameworks that will enable teacher training institutions effectively evaluate their pre-service teachers during teaching practice. This framework was further analysed using Greenstein's 21st-century assessment fundamentals to evaluate the available framework ability toward 21st-century assessment. The analysis had shown that there were two areas of fundamentals that need to be rework which is flexible and communicated. |
| References |
1. Al-Malki, M. A., & Weir, K. (2014). A Comparative Analysis between the Assessment Criteria Used to Assess Graduating Teachers at Rustaq College (Oman) and Griffith University (Australia) During The Teaching Practicum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(12), 28–42. 2. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework.International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. 3. Balla, J., & Boyle, P. (1994). Assessment of Student Performance: a framework for improving practice. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 19(1),17–28. http://doi.org/10.1080/0260293940190102 4. Danielson, C. (2014). The Framework for Teaching Evaluation Instrument, 2013 Edition. Retrieved from https://www.danielsongroup.org/download/?download=448 5. Darling-Hammond, L. (2014). One Piece of the Whole: Teacher Evaluation as Part of a Comprehensive System for Teaching and Learning. American Educator, 38(1), 4–13. 6. Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5–6), 523–545.http://doi.org/10.1016/S0742- 051X(00)00015-9 7. Dwyer, C. A. (1991). Measurement and Research issues in Teacher Assessment. Educational Psychologist, 26(1), 3–22. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2601_1 8. Goos, M., & Moni, K. (2001). Modelling Professional Practice: A collaborative approach to developing criteria and standards-based assessment in pre-service teacher education courses. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(1), 73–88. http://doi.org/10.1080/02602930020022291a 9. Greenstein, L. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: A Guide to Evaluating Mastery and Authentic Learning. California: SAGE Publications. 10. Hiebert, J., Morris, A. K., Berk, D., & Jansen, A. (2007). Preparing Teachers to Learn from Teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 47–61. http://doi.org/10.1177/0022487106295726 11. Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O’Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implementation Science : IS, 5, 69. http://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 12. Merç, A. (2015). Assessing the Performance in EFL Teaching Practicum: Student Teachers’ Views. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(2), 44–56. http://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v4n2p44 13. Newby, D. (2012). Supporting good practice in teacher education through the European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 6(3), 207–218. http://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2012.725250 14. Nilsen, P. (2015). Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implementation Science, 10(1), 53. http://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0 15. Norshiha, S. (2011). Key Elements in the Successful Clinical Experience of Pre-service Teachers. Asian Journal of University Education, 7(2), 1–19. 16. Peterman, F. (2005). Designing Performance Assessment Systems for Urban Teacher Preparation. Designing Performance Assessment Systems for Urban Teacher Preparation. Routledge. http://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612991 17. Queensland College of Teachers. (2012). An investigation of best practice in evidence-based assessment within preservice teacher education programs and other professions. 18. Queensland Government. (2001). Years 1-10 Curriculum Framework for Education Queensland Schools: Policy and Guidelines. Queensland, Australia. 19. Sato, M., Wei, R. C., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Improving Teachers’ Assessment Practices Through Professional Development: The Case of National Board Certification. American Educational Research Journal, 45(X), 669–700. http://doi.org/10.3102/0002831208316955 20. Sedumedi, T. D. T., & Mundalamo, F. J. (2012). Understanding field assessment of pre-service teachers on school practicum Understanding field assessment of pre- service teachers on school practicum. Africa Education Review, 6627(November). http://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2012.755247 21. Ssentamu-Namubiru, P. (2010). Teaching practicum supervisors’ identity and student assessment on the practicum: An assorted mind-set? Africa Education Review, 7(2), 305–322. http://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2010.515423 22. Syed Ismail, S.M. (2012). Amalan Bimbingan Pengajaran Pensyarah dan Guru Pembimbing Dalam Program Mentoring Praktikum Serta Impaknya Terhadap Kualiti Guru Pelatih. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 38(1), 71–78. 23. Sylvia Yee Fan Tang, May May Hung Cheng, & Winnie Wing Mui So. (2007). Supporting Student Teachers’ Professional Learning with Standards‐Referenced Assessment. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(2), 223–244. http://doi.org/10.1080/13598660600720629 24. Teacher Education Ministerial Advisory Group. (2014). Action Now: Classroom Ready Teachers. 25. Tigelaar, D. E. H., & van Tartwijk, J. (2010). The Evaluation of Prospective Teachers in Teacher Education, 511–517. dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00647-3 26. Wong, Y. M., Mohd. Hassan A., Rosnidar M., & Syakirah S. (2014). The Analysis of UPSI Teacher Clinical Experience In Comparative Perspective and Suggestion for New Teacher Clinical Experience Structure Research Objective Structure of Teacher Clinical Experience in Different Countries Teacher Clinical Experience of the. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(2–11), 14–23. 27. Zailani, J. (2013). Teaching Practicum : Student Teachers ’ Perspectives. In 3rd International Conference On Foreign Language Language And Teaching (pp. 865–874). Bangkok: Language Institute, Thammasat University. 28. Zakaria K., & Rahman A. (1995). Sikap dan Masalah Guru Pelatih dalam Menjalani Latihan Mengajar. Pertanika, 3(2), 125–133. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |