UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :Q Science (General)
ISSN :0972-9380
Main Author :Maha Mohammed Yusr
Additional Authors :Sany Sanuri Mohd Mokhtar
Selvan Perumal
Abdullateef, Aliyu Olayemi
Ries Fathilah
Nek Kamal Yeop Yunus
Title :Managing absorptive capacity to enhance the influence of TQM practices on product performance
Year of Publication :2017

Abstract :
Innovation, nowadays classified among the best strategies of the organizations’ survival. However, innovation combines with high level of risk that requests certain level of capabilities in order to face different kinds of risks. Therefore, this study is an attempt to investigate the relationship between TQM practices, absorptive capacity and innovation performance. The sample size was manufacturing companies operating in Malaysia. The main findings indicate to the positive effect of applying TQM on absorptive capacity, while the relationships between TQM and innovation performance was not supported. In the light of the output several recommendations have been mentioned to the managers of the companies.

References

1. Abrunhosa, A., & Moura E Sá, P. (2008). Are TQM principles supporting innovation in the Portuguese footwear industry? Technovation, 28(4), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2007.08.001 2. Almeida, P., Song, J., & Grant, R. M. (2002). Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? Organization Science, 13(2), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.147.534 3. Babbie, E. (1990). Survey research methods (2nd ed). Belmont: Wadsworth.Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. a. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. 4. Bosch, F. A. J. Van Den, Volberda, H. W., & Boer, M. De. (1999). Coevolution of Firm Absorptive Capacity and and Forms Environment/ : Organizational Combinative Capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551–568. 5. Brah, S. a., Tee, S. S. L., & Rao, B. M. (2002). Relationship between TQM and performance of Singapore companies.International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(4), 356–379. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710210421553 6. Chourides, P., Longbottom, D., & Murphy, W. (2003). Excellence in knowledge management/ : An empirical study to identify critical factors and performance measures. Measuring Business Excellence, 7(2), 29–45. 7. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D. The Economic Journa, 99(397),569–596. 8. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity/ : A New Perspective on and Innovation Learning. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152. 9. Cole, R. E., & Matsumiya, T. (2008). When the pursuit of quality risks innovation. The TQM Journal, 20(2), 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542730810857363 10. Darroch, J., & McNaughton, R. (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 210–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930210435570 11. FMM. (2013). Federation of Malaysian Manufacturers (41 st ed). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: FMM Directory. 12. George, G., Kotha, R., & Zheng, Y. (2008). Entry into insular domains: A longitudinal study of knowledge structuration and innovation in biotechnology firms. Journal of Management StudiesJournal of Management Studies, 45(8), 1448–1474. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00805.x 13. Hackman, J. R., & Wageman, R. (1995). Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393640 14. Hung, R. Y. Y., Lien, B. Y.-H., Yang, B., Wu, C.-M., & Kuo, Y.-M. (2010). Impact of TQM and organizational learning on innovation performance in the high-tech industry. International Business Review, 20(2), 213–225. 15. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1996). What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning. Organization Science, 7(5), 502–518. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.7.5.502 16. Kumar, R., Garg, D., & Garg, T. K. (2011). TQM success factors in North Indian manufacturing and service industries. The TQM Journal, 23(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542731111097470 17. López-Mielgo, N., Montes-Peón, J. M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C. J. (2009). Are quality and innovation management conflicting activities? Technovation, 29(8), 537–545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2009.02.005 18. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company how Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. 19. Ooi, K. (2009). TQM and knowledge management/ : Literature review and proposed framework. African Journal of Business Management, 3(11), 633–643. 20. Pekovic, S., & Galia, F. (2009). From quality to innovation: Evidence from two French Employer Surveys. Technovation, 29, 829–842. 21. Pinho, J. C. (2008). TQM and performance in small medium enterprises: The mediating effect of customer orientation and innovation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 25(3), 256–275. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710810854278 22. Popadiuk, S., & Choo, C. W. (2006). Innovation and knowledge creation: How are these concepts related? International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 302–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2006.03.011 23. Prajogo, D. I., & Hong, S. W. (2008). The effect of TQM on performance in R&D environments: A perspective from South Korean firms. Technovation, 28(12), 855–863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2008.06.001 24. Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2003). The relationship between TQM practices, quality performance, and innovation performance: An empirical examination. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(8), 901–918. 25. Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2006). The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega, 34(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2004.11.004 26. Quintane, E., Casselman, R. M., Reiche, B. S., & Nylund, P. a. (2011). Innovation as a knowledge-based outcome. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 928–947. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179299 27. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (4th ed.). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 28. Singh, P. J., & Smith, A. J. R. (2004). Relationship between TQM and innovation: an empirical study. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 394–401. 29. Skyrme, D., & Amidon, D. (1997). The Knowledge Agenda. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(1), 27–37. 30. Tseng, C.-Y., Pai, D. C., & Hung, C.-H. (2011). Knowledge absorptive capacity and innovation performance in KIBS. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 971–983. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179316 31. Yusr, M. M., Othman, A. R., & Mokhtar, S. S. M. (2011). Six Sigma and Innovation Performance/ : A Conceptual Framework Based on the Absorptive Capacity Theory Perspective. International Journal of Emerging Science, 1(3), 307–323.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.