UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : |
| The purpose of this study is to develop and establish the validity and reliability of an instrument to generate teaching and learning guiding principles using Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles Instrument (TLGPI). Participants consisted of 171 Malaysian teacher educators. It is an essential instrument to reflect in generating the teaching and learning guiding principles in higher education level in Malaysia. Confirmatory Factor Analysis has validated all 19 items of TLGPI whereby all items indicated high reliability and internal consistency. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis also confirmed that a single factor model was used to generate teaching and learning guiding principles. |
| References |
1. Wang, C.L., Ahmed, P.K. The development and validation of the organisational innovativeness construct using confirmatory factor analysis (2004) European Journal of Innovation Management, 7 (4), pp.303-313. Cited 398 times. doi: 10.1108/14601060410565056 2.Babbie, E. (1992) The Practice of Social Research, p. 7. Cited 6668 times. Wadsworth Publishing Company, California 3. Uzuntiryaki, E., Aydin, Y.C. Development and validation of chemistry self-efficacy scale for college students (2009) Research in Science Education, 39 (4), pp. 539-551. Cited 41 times. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9093-x 4. Hénard, F. (2010) Learning Our Lesson: Review of Quality Teaching in Higher, p. 4. Cited 49 times. OECD, Paris 5. Koh, K.H., Zumbo, B.D. Multi-group confirmatory factor analysis for testing measurement invariance in mixed item format data (Open Access) (2008) Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 7 (2), pp. 471-477. Cited 21 times. http://www.jmasm.com/journal/2008_vol7_no2.pdf doi: 10.22237/jmasm/1225512660 6. Bernstein, I.H., Teng, G. Factoring Items and Factoring Scales Are Different: Spurious Evidence for Multidimensionality Due to Item Categorization (1989) Psychological Bulletin, 105 (3), pp. 467-477. Cited 233 times. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.467 7. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. Cited 46757 times. 7th ed. (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey) 8. Wilson, K.L., Lizzio, A., Ramsden, P. The Development, Validation and Application of the Course Experience Questionnaire (1997) Studies in Higher Education, 22 (1), pp. 33-52. Cited 246 times. 9. (2012) Laporan Awal Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan 2013-2025 Ministry of Education. www.moe.gov.my/userfiles/file /PPP/ Preliminary-Blueprint-BM.pdf 10. Adnan, M., Masuwai, A., Tajudin, N.M., Rahman, N.A. An Exploratory Factor Analysis on Generating Teaching and Learning Guiding Principles from Malaysian Teacher Educators' Perspective (2015) Creative Education, 6 (12), pp. 1245-1255. Cited 2 times. 11. McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., Kavanagh, S.S. Core Practices and Pedagogies of Teacher Education: A Call for a Common Language and Collective Activity (2013) Journal of Teacher Education, 64 (5), pp. 378-386. Cited 152 times. doi: 10.1177/0022487113493807 12. Tajudin, N., Rahman, N.A., Masuwai, A., Idris, N. Comparison between Teaching Practices Based on Teacher Educators' Perception and Learning Experiences Based on Student Teachers' Perception at Higher Education Institution (2014) Research Journal in Organizational Psychology and Educational Studies (RJOPES), 3 (6), pp. 437-445. 13. Den Brok, P., Fisher, D., Rickards, T., Bull, E. Californian science students' perceptions of their classroom learning environments (2006) Educational Research and Evaluation, 12 (1), pp. 3-25. Cited 46 times. doi: 10.1080/13803610500392053 14. Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., McDonald, M. Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education (2009) Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15 (2), pp. 273-289. Cited 444 times. doi: 10.1080/13540600902875340 15. Lei, P.-W., Wu, Q. An NCME instructional module on: Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations (2007) Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26 (3), pp. 33-43. Cited 254 times. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.2007.00099.x 16. Hashim, R.A., Sani, A.M. A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Newly Integrated Multidimensional School Engagement Scale (2008) Malaysian Journal of Instruction, 5, pp. 21-40. Cited 11 times. 17. Kline, R.B. (2011) Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Cited 24175 times. 3rd ed. (The Guilford Press, New York) 18. Schumacker, R.E., Lomax, R.G. (2010) A Beginner's Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, pp. 73-120. Cited 770 times. (Routledge, New York) 19. Henson, R.K., Roberts, J.K. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice (2006) Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66 (3), pp. 393-416. Cited 793 times. http://www.sageltd.co.uk/journals/details/j0038.html doi: 10.1177/0013164405282485 20. Worthington, R.L., Whittaker, T.A. Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices (2006) The Counseling Psychologist, 34 (6), pp. 806-838. Cited 958 times. doi: 10.1177/0011000006288127 21. Brown, T.A. (2006) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, pp. 157-209. Cited 6202 times. The Guildford Press, London 22. Awang, Z. (2012) A Handbook on Structural Equation Modeling Using AMOS Graphic, pp. 62-79. Cited 54 times. Universiti Teknologi Mara Kelantan, Kota Bharu |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |