UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : |
Teaching practice during school based experiences, afford an opportunity for pre service teachers to put into practice their knowledge for teaching mathematics. Like all knowledge, Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching (MKT) is held in both tacit and explicit form, making it especially difficult to study and map during instruction. This study investigates the tacit and explicit nature of MKT held by pre service teachers in a Malaysian Teacher Education Program and how it impacts the Mathematical Quality of their instruction (MQI). This study of three mathematics pre-service teachers (PSTs), utilised videos of mathematics lessons, reflective debriefs and interviews. The findings suggest that factors such as reflecting, peer-sharing, conferencing with mentors and observing support in making tacit knowledge more explicit during planning and instruction. Implications for preparation of mathematics teachers capable of high Mathematical Quality of Instruction are also discussed. |
References |
1. Pournara, C., Hodgen, J., Adler, J., Pillay, V. Can improving teachers’ knowledge of mathematics lead to gains in learners’ attainment in mathematics? (Open Access) (2015) South African Journal of Education, 35 (3), art. no. 1083. Cited 10 times. http://reference.sabinet.co.za/webx/ access/electronic_journals/educat/educat_v35_n3_a7.pdf doi: 10.15700/saje.v35n3a1083 2. Polanyi, M. (1969) Knowing and Being: Essay by Michael Polanyi. Cited 583 times.M. Grene (Ed.). Routledge and K. Paul 3. Ball, D.L., Lubienski, S.T., Mewborn, D.S. Research on teaching mathematics: The unsolved problem of teacher's mathematical knowledge (2001) Handbook of Research on Teaching, pp. 433-453. Cited 320 times. V. Richardson (Ed.), (4th ed., p). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association 4. Loewenberg Ball, D., Thames, M.H., Phelps, G. Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? (2008) Journal of Teacher Education, 59 (5), pp. 389-407. Cited 1268 times. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554 5. Hill, H.C., Blunk, M.L., Charalambous, C.Y., Lewis, J.M., Phelps, G.C., Sleep, L., Ball, D.L. Mathematical knowledge for teaching and the mathematical quality of instruction: An exploratory study (Open Access) (2008) Cognition and Instruction, 26 (4), pp. 430-511. Cited 291 times. doi: 10.1080/07370000802177235 6. Measuring the mathematical quality of instruction (2011) Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14 (1), pp. 25-47. Cited 42 times. doi: 10.1007/s10857-010-9140-1 7. Powell, A.B., Francisco, J.M., Maher, C.A. An analytical model for studying the development of learners' mathematical ideas and reasoning using videotape data (2003) Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 22 (4), pp. 405-435. Cited 123 times. http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jmathb doi: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2003.09.002 8. Zazkis, R., Leikin, R. Advanced mathematical knowledge in teaching practice: Perceptions of secondary mathematics teachers (2010) Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12 (4), pp. 263-281. Cited 33 times. doi: 10.1080/10986061003786349 9. Wright, H. Tacit knowledge and pedagogy at UK universities: Challenges for effective management (2008) The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 6 (1), pp. 49-62. Cited 9 times. 10. Polanyi, M. (1967) The Tacit Dimension. Cited 9008 times. London: Routledge and K. Paul 11. Nonaka, I. The knowledge creating company (1991) Harvard Business Review, 69. Cited 3058 times. November-December, 96-104 12. Jarvis, J., Dickerson, C., Thomas, K., Graham, S. The action - reflection - modelling (ARM) pedagogical approach for: Teacher education: A malaysia-UK project (Open Access) (2014) Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39 (3), pp. 89-118. Cited 7 times. http://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi article=2183&context=ajte doi: 10.14221/ajte.2014v39n3.2 |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |