Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3D drawing for secondary school students

Azlan Sukamat

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	N Visual arts (General) For photography, see TR
ISSN :	2289-4640
Main Author :	Azlan Sukamat
Additional Authors :	Abdul Aziz Zalay@Zali
Title :	Preliminary studies and pilot testing to implement blended learning approach in learning 3D drawing for secondary school students

Place of Production :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Year of Publication :	2018

Abstract :

This paper presents an insight on the preliminary studies and pilot testing conducted to implement blended learning approach in learning 3D drawing for secondary school students by blending face-to-face classroom with ICT-based settings using 3D Blender Tutorial Courseware, Youtube and Whatsapp interactive group chat apps. The objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of blended learning approach on the students’ drawing skills, motivation, and learner autonomy, and also to determine the impact of students’ perspective of blended learning and teachers’ attitudes on their learning outcomes. The study was conducted by using quantitative method through performance evaluation and survey on 40 secondary school students from Malaysian Arts School, Johor and English College, Johor. It was found that there was a significant difference in the respondent’s level of 3D drawing skills, motivation and learner autonomy after using the blended learning approach. This study also revealed that the respondent’s attitude towards blended learning and perception of teacher’s attitude had a strong and significant effect on their motivation and learner autonomy but no significant effect on their 3D drawing skills. The outcome of this study can be used to determine whether blended learning approach is effective in a technical art setting particularly in teaching and learning 3D drawing for secondary schools.

References

1. Abdulrasool, S., Mishra, R., & Khalaf, H. (2010). Teachers’ and Students' Attitudes Towards Traditional and Computer Assisted Blended Teaching and Learning Processes in Mechanical Engineering Subjects Area. Proceeding of 10th IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (pp. 1436- 1441). United Kingdom: University of Huddersfield. 2. Andreas Ahrens, Jeļena Zaščerinska & Natalia Andreeva. Engineering Students’ Blended Learning in Higher Education. Proceeding of the International Scientifical Conference, Volume I. 3. Baldwin-Evans, K. (2006). Key steps to implementing a successful blended learning strategy. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(3), 156-163. doi:10.1108/00197850610659427 4. Banks, J. (2001). From boring to "Blackboarding": Building participation through VLE group work. Retrieved from http://cebe.cf.ac.uk/learning/casestudies/case_pdf/jbanks.pdf 5. Barshay, J. (2011). Blended learning for the little ones. (Cover story). Education Week, 31(9), pp.1-14. 6. Bayram Güzer & Hamit Caner. (2013). The past, present and future of blended learning: an in depth analysis of literature. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 (2014), pp. 4596 – 4603. 7. Beadle, M., & Santy, J. (2008). The early benefits of a problem-based approach to teaching social inclusion using an online virtual town. Nurse Education in Practice, 8(3), 190-196. doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2007.07.004 8. Bliuc, A. M., Goodyear, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2007). Research focus and methodological choices in studies into students' experiences of blended learning in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(4), 231-244. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.08.001 9. Bogdan, Chiliban, Damaris, Căuneac & Marius Chiliban. (2012). Facilitating learning Using Modern E- Learning Tools in Technical Drawing and Infographics Teaching. The 6th Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education, Sibiu, Romania (Oct 18-21, 2012). 10. Boyle, T., Bradley, C., Chalk, P., Jones, R., & Pickard, P. (2003). Using blended learning to improve student success rates in learning to program. Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 165-178. doi:10.1080/1358165032000153160 11. Chambers, M. (1999). The efficacy and ethics of using digital multimedia for educational purposes. In A. Tait & R. Mills (Eds.), The convergence of distance and conventional education: Patterns of flexibility for the individual learner (pp. 5-16). New York, NY: Routledge. 12. Cohen, K. E., Stage, F. K., Hammack, F. M., & Marcus, A. (2012). Persistence of master’s students in the United States: Developing and testing of a conceptual model. USA: PhD Dissertation, New York University. 13. Donnely, R. (2010). Harmonizing technology with interaction in blended problem-based learning. Computers & Education, 54(2), 350-359. 14. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J., Juge, F., Moskal, P., & Sorg, S. (2006). Blended learning enters the mainstream. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 195-208). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer. 15. Garnham, C., & Kaleta, R. (2002). Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6). Retrieved from http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm 16. Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. 17. Garrison, D.R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Journal of Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. 18. Ginns, R., & Ellis, R. (2007). Quality in blended learning: Exploring the relationships between on-line and face-to-face teaching and learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(1), 53-64. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.10.003 19. Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definitions, current trends and future directions. In C. J. Bonk, & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The Handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21).San Francisco: Pfeiffer. 20. Harris, P., Connolly, J., & Feeney, L. (2009). Blended learning: Overview and recommendations for successful implementation. Industrial and Commercial Training, 41(3), 155-163. doi:10.1108/00197850910950961 21. Haryani Haron, Wan Faezah Abbas & Nor Aini Abd Rahman (2012). The Adoption of Blended Learning among Malaysian Academicians. Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on e-Learning ICEL 2011 (pp. 175-181). Bandung, Indonesia. 22. Hofmann, J. (2014). Solutions to the Top 10 Challenges of Blended Learning. Insync Training. Retrieved from https://www.insynctraining.com/pages/SolutionstotheTop10ChallengesofBlendedLearning.pdf 23. Horn, M.B. and Staker, H. (2011). Classifying K–12. Blended learning. Innosight Institute. 24. Joanna Poon (2013). Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students' Learning Experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, Vol. 9, No. 2, June 2013. 25. Katrina Bushko (2017). How Malaysian schools are tackling blended-learning challenges. Retrieved from https://www.christenseninstitute.org/blog/malaysian-schools-tackling-blended-learning-challenges/ 26. Kenney, J. and Newcombe,E. (2011). Adopting a blended learning approach: Challenges encountered and lessons learned in an action research study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 45-57. 27. Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research & Development, 41(3), 4-16. doi:10.1007/BF02297354 28. Lim, D. H., & Morris, M. L. (2009). Learner and instructional factors influencing learning outcomes within a blended learning environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 282-293. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/12_4/24.pdf 29. López-Pérez, M., Pérez-López, M. C., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2011). Blended learning in higher education: Students’ perceptions and their relation to outcomes. Computers & Education, 56(3), 818-826. 30. Mason, R., & Rennie, F. (2006). E-learning: The key concepts. Abingdon, UK: Routledge. 31. Md.Nasir, I. (2013). Bahasa Visual. KUPAS SENI: Jurnal Seni Dan Pendidikan Seni, Vol.1(2013), 19–25. Mitchell, A., & Honore, S. (2007). Criteria for successful blended learning. Industrial and Commercial Training, 39(3), 143-149. doi:10.1108/00197850710742243 32. Mohd Saidi Yusof , Che Soh Said , Mohammad Rusdi Mohd Nasir & Adnan Rozali (2017). Application of Virtual Reality Technology in Developing Courseware Terengganu’s Malay Traditional House. KUPAS SENI: Jurnal Seni dan Pendidikan Seni, 2017 Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp76-86 33. Mugenyi Justice Kintu & Chang Zhu (2016). Student Characteristics and Learning Outcomes in a Blended Learning Environment Intervention in a Ugandan University. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, Volume 14 Issue 3 2016, (pp. 181- 195). 34. Naemah Abdul Wahab, Jamal Othman & Saiful Nizam Warris (2016). Blended Learning In Higher Education: An Overview. Volume 5 Issue 2 2016 e-Academia Journal UiTMT (http://journale- academiauitmt.edu.my/) 35. O'Toole, J. M., & Absalom, D. J. (2003). The impact of blended learning on student outcomes: Is there room on the horse for two? Journal of Educational Media, 28(2-3), 179-190. doi:10.1080/1358165032000165680 36. Owston, R., Wideman, H., Murphy, J., & Lupshenyuk, D. (2008). Blended teacher professional development: A synthesis of three program evaluations. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 201-210. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.07.003 37. Sevgi Ozkan, Refika Koseler & Baykal (2009). Evaluating Learning Management Systems: Hexagonal E- Learning Assessment Model (HELAM). European and Mediterranean Conference on Information Systems 2008 (May 25-26 2008), Al Bustan Rotana Hotel, Dubai.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page