UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This study aimed to analyze the implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu District, and to determine the relationship between the implementation of level I science curriculum and the teachers’ understanding. A mixed method approach was used. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaire from 127 science teachers, meanwhile the qualitative data collected through interviews, classroom observations and document analysis. The quantitative data were analyzed through SPSS, while the interview data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti. The findings show there is a significant positive relationship between the teachers’ understanding and the translation of science curriculum into the lesson plan. A significant positive relationship is also found between the teachers’ understanding and the strategies used in teaching science. There is also a positive relationship between the teachers’ understanding and the assessment methods carried out in the classroom. Nevertheless, insufficient of time in completing the learning standard and insufficient apparatus have become issues and challenges due to less understanding of the content of level I science curriculum. In conclusion, there is a positive relationship between all studied aspects of teachers’ understanding towards the reformed primary science curriculum and its implementation. In implication, the study indicates that there is a need in professional development trainings for teachers who are teaching level I science in order to maximize curriculum implementation at the classroom level. |
References |
Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). Pengajian kurikulum. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Abdul Rahman, A. (1987). Curriculum innovation in Malaysia: The case of KBSR. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London Institute of Education.
Abdul Rahman, S. B. (2007). The implementation of the Contemporary Children's Literature program in Malaysian primary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Reading.
Airini, C., McNaughton, S., Langley, J., & Sauni, P. (2007). What educational reform means: Lessons from teachers, research and policy working together for student success. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(1), 31–54.
Akerson,V., Buck,G., Donnelly,L. Nargundi-Joshi, V. & Weiland, I. (2011). The importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. Journal of Educational Technology, 20, 537-549.
Allan, A.G., Boschee, F., Whitehead, B.M., & Boschee, B.F. (2016). In Curriculum Leadership: Strategies for Development and implementation (4th ed.). Washington DC. Sage.
Al-Mekhlafi, A., & Nagaratnam, R. P. (2012). From firm ground to shifting sands: Issues in adopting learner-centred ESL/EFL pedagogy. The English Teacher, 41(1), 71–89.
Altrichter, H. (2005). Curriculum implementation – limiting and facilitating factors. In P. Nentwig & D. Waddington. (Eds.), Context based learning of science Munster: Waxmann. pp. 35–62.
Aloka, P. J. O. (2012). Group polarization in decision-making: A study of selected secondary school disciplinary panels in Rongo district of Kenya. (Doctoral thesis) University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.
Aman, I., & Mustaffa, R. (2006). Classroom discourse of Malay language lesson: A critical analysis. Jurnal e-Bangi, 1(1), 1–24.
Amir Salleh (1993). Inservice training needs assessment for Malaysian secondary school teachers. Unpublished Phd Thesis, The University of Michigan.
Anderson, C. (2001). Designing systems to support learning science with understanding for all: Developing dialogues among researchers, reformers, and developers (No. available at http://www.project2061.org/events/meetings/textbook/science /anderson.htm). Washington, DC: Project 2061.
Ashley, L. D. (2012). Case study research in J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Research methods and methodologies in education London: Sage. pp.102–107.
ASLI-CPPS, PROHAM & KITA-UKM. (2012). Report on education reform and process of consultation. Retrieved January 19, 2013 from http://www.cpps.org.my/upload/EDUCATION%20REFORM%20IN%20MAL AYSIA%20REPORT%202012.pdf
Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 30, 83-90
Best, J., W., & Kahn, J., V. (2008). Research in education: Tenth Edition. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall.
Black,P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of Formative Assessment Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability.
Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP), 1(2), 1-12.
Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook on formative and summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Brain,K.,Reid,I.,&Boyes,L.C.(2006).Teachers as mediators between educational policy and practice. Educational Studies, 32(4), 411–423.
Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press.
Carless, R. D. (1998). A case study of curriculum implementation in Hong Kong. System, 26, 353–368.
Carless, R. D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639–662.
Caswell, H. L., & Campbell, D.S. (1935). Curriculum development. New York: American Book Company.
Cheserek, G. J., & Mugalavai, V. K. (2012). Challenges and reforms facing Kenyan education system in the 21st century: Integrating the principles of Vision 2030 and Constitution 2010. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational, 406.
Chisholm, L., & Leyendecker, R. (2008). Curriculum reform in post-1990s sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 195–205.
Chua, Y.P. (2012). Asas Statistik dan Penyelidikan (2nd ed.). Mc Graw Hill Education, Malaysia.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). London: Routledge.
Corbin.J and Strauss, (1990a). Grounded Theory Tesearch: Procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.
Crawford, B. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
Crump, S., & Ryan, C. (2001). Managing educational change: Issues, actions and examples. Change: Transformations in Education, 4(2), 1–14.
Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Silver, R. E. (2012). Educational reforms, cultural clashes and classroom practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 141–161. DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002). Developing constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical, principle, and activities. New York: Teachers College Press.
Dewey J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.
Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ebert, E.S., II, Ebert, C., Bentley, M. L. (2013, July 19). The educator’s field guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
Economic and Social Research Council. ‘What influences participation in science and mathematics?’ A briefing paper from the Targeted Initiative on Science and Mathematics Education (TISME). London: ESRC/TISME; 2013. tismescienceandmaths.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/TISME-ParticipationReport.pdf
Edelson, D., & Reiser, B. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners: Design challenges and strategies. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 335-354)
Esah Sulaiman. (2004). Pengenalan pedagogi. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers College Press.
Fullan, M . & Pomfret, A. (1975). Review of research on curriculum implementation. Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.
Fullan, M . & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on Curriculum and Instruction Implementation.
Gotwals, A., & Songer, N. B. (2006). Measuring students' scientific content and inquiry reasoning. In S. Barab, K. Hay & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 1, 196-202. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hanna, G. S., & Dettmer, P. A. (2004). Assessment for effective teaching: Using contextadaptive planning. Boston, MA.
Hasimah.Y., (2001). Primary science in Malaysia: The implementation of a new curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick.
Hay, J. F. Smith & Paulsen, M. (2001). Teacher preparedness in inclusive education. South African Journal of Higher Education, 21(4), 213- 218.
Holton, E. H., & Burnett, M. B. (1997). Qualitative research methods. In R. A. Swanson, & E. F, Holton (Eds.), Human resource development research handbook: Linking research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Indiana Department of education. (2010). Definition of terms. Indiana Accountability System for Academic Progress. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/asap/definitions.html.
Ishtiaq Hussein and Qaiser Sulaiman. (2016), Effect of Bloom Mastery Learning Approach on Students’ Academic Achievement in English at secondary Level. Journal of Literature Language and Linguistics, 23, 2422-8435.
Jan Hardman and Norhaslynda (2014) Teachers and the implementation of new English Curriculum in Malaysia, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(3), 260- 277
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research. A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
Kamsiah. O., Lilia. H. & Subahan. M., (2006). What Malaysian science teacher need to improve their Science Instruction: A comparison across Gender, School Location and area of Specialization. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 2(2), 59-81.
Karen, C., and Jeannette. G., (2014, March 23). Problems being resolved. Plague with difficulties from the time of its implementation three years ago, the recent review of PBS has brought some cheer to the parties concerned. Retrieved from http://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2014/03/23/being-resolved/.
Kevin W. Curry Jr., Elizabeth Wilson, Jim L. Flowers & Charlotte E. Farin., (2012). Scientific Basis vs. Contextualized Teaching and Learning: The Effect on the Achievement of Postsecondary Students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(1), 57–66.
Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 10055-1080.
Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.
Lee, M.N.N. (1992). School science curriculum reforms in Malaysia: world influences and National Context. International Journal of Science Education.
Leedy, P. & Ormrod, J. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications
Lumpe., A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J. & Beltyukova,.S. (2012). Belief about teaching science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in Professional development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 34(2), 153-166.
Makunja, G. (2016). Challenges Facing Teachers in Implementing Competence-Based Curriculum in Tanzania: The Case of Community Secondary Schools in Morogoro Municipality. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 3(5), 30-37
Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marsh, J. C., & Willis, G. (2nd ed.). (1998). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing issues. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Martin, P. W. (1999). Close encounters of a bilingual kind: Interactional practices in the primary classroom in Brunei. International Journal of Educational Development, 19, 127–140.
McMillan, J. H. (2004). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (4th ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson.
McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved July 27, 2013 from www.ascd.org
Mears, C. L. (2012). In-depth interviews. In J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), Research methods & methodologies in education (pp. 170–176). London: Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Miles, M. & Louis, K. (1990). Mustering the will and skill for change. Educational Leadership. 47(8).
Millar, R. (1987). Teaching physics as a non-specialist. Department of Education, University of York.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012a). Ministry of Education policies: Frequently asked questions. Retrieved February 29, 2016 from http://www.scribd.com/doc/105793167/Dasar-Dasar-KPM -NCM
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012b). Quick facts 2012: Malaysia educational statistics. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012c). Preliminary report: Malaysia education blueprint 2013–2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.
Minner. D. & Jacqueline. D., (2012) Inquiry into Science Instruction Observation Protocol (ISIOP). Data Collection instrument. National Science Foundation.
Mohamad Idris Abdul Hamid., (2002). Kajian keperluan guru-guru sains Sekolah Rendah dalam aspek Pengajaran Sains. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.
Montgomery, B., & Way, W. L. (1995, December 1st). Lost and found voices in the process of curriculum change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Vocational Association Convention, Denver, Colorado, USA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED397269).
Mustaffa, R., Aman, I., Teo, K. S., & Mohd Noor, N. (2011). Pedagogical practices of English language lessons in Malaysian primary schools: A discourse analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 626–639.
Mustapha, G. (2008). A reflection of the revised syllabus translated in textbooks. Journal of International Management Studies, 3(1), 162–169.
National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
Norhaslynda., Rahman. (2014). From Curriculum reform to Classroom Practice: An evaluation of English Primary Curriculum in Malaysia. A thesis presented in fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Education at University of York.
O’Donnell, K. (2005). Japanese secondary English teachers: Negotiation of educational roles in the face of curricular reform. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18(3), 300–315.
Ofsted, (2013). Maintaining Curiosity: A survey into science education in schools. Manchester: Ofsted; 2013; 7. ofsted.gov.uk/resources/maintaining-curiosity-surveyscience-education-schools
Orafi, S.M.S.,& Borg,S. (2009).Intentions and realites in implementing communicative curriculum reform. System, 37, 243–253.
Pandian, A. (2002). English language teaching in Malaysia today. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 22(2), 35–52.
Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958.
Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. AMC, 10, 12.
Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought. New York, NY: Viking: The Penguin Group.
Ryan, J., Kang, C.Y., Mitchell, I., & Erickson, G. (2009). Cross cultural research collaboration in the context of China’s basic education reform. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 29(4), 427–441.
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: forward, central and backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33.
Sandelowski M.(1994) Focus on qualitative methods: Notes on transcription. Res Nurs Health 1994;17:3
Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From solution to problem. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 425– 432.
Shihiba, S. E. S. (2011). An investigation of Libyan EFL teachers’ conceptions of the communicative learner-centred approach in relation to their implementation of an English language curriculum innovation in secondary schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Durham, Durham, UK.
Shumba, A., Mpofu, E., Seotlew. M., & Montsi, M.R. (2011). Perceived Challenges of Implementing the Guidance Subject in Botswana Primary Schools. Journal of Science, 28(1), 1-11.
Sidhu, G. K., Fook, C. Y., & Kaur, S. (2010). Instructional practices in teaching literature: Observations of ESL classrooms in Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 54–63.
Smit, B. (2005). Teachers, local knowledge, and policy implementation: A qualitative policy-practice inquiry. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 292–306.
Subahan M. M, Lilia, H., Khalijah, M.S. & Ruhizan, M. Y, (2001). IRPA Report: Nonoption physics teachers: preparation for better teaching.
Swart, E. & Pettipher, R. (2007). Understanding and Working with Change (eds), Responding to the challenge of Inclusive Education in Southern Africa. Pretoria: pp 121-139
Syed Kamaruzaman .,(2003). Teachers’ Planning and preparation for the lesson plan in the implementation of Form 4 Physical Education Curriculum for the physical fitness strand. Journal of Education Science, 1(4), 38-47
Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128148.
Teresa, W., (2007). Re-Gendering Data: Quantifying Qualitative: Paper presented at association for institutional Research. Atlanta.
Tweed, (2009), Designing Effective Science Instruction: What works in Science classroom? National Teacher Association press. p.38
Tyler, R.W. (1957). The Curriculum then and now. In proceedings of the 1956 Invitational conference on testing Problem. Princeton. NJ : Educational Testing Service.
Wang, H. (2006). An implementation study of the English as a foreign language curriculum policies in the Chinese tertiary context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s University, Belfast.
Wolfinger, N.. H. (2002). On writing fieldnotes: Collection strategies and background expectancies. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 85-95.
ASLI-CPPS, PROHAM & KITA-UKM. (2012). Report on education reform and process of consultation. Retrieved January 19, 2013 from http://www.cpps.org.my/upload/EDUCATION%20REFORM%20IN%20MALAYSIA%20REPORT%202012.pdf
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wadsworth, B. J. (2004). Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development: Foundations of constructivism. Longman Publishing.
Wang, H., & Cheng, L. (2008). The impact of curriculum innovation on the cultures of teaching. The Chinese English Foreign Language Journal, 1(1), 5–30.
Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research methods in education: An introduction (9th ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson.
Winter, E.C. (2006). Preparing new teachers for inclusive schools and classrooms. Support for learning, 21(2), 85-91.
Ye, L. (2004). Let the classroom teaching be more vital. Teachers’ Friend, 1, 49–53.
Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of learning information system on Mathematic achievement and classroom structure. Journal of Educational Science,1(4), 38-47.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Yildiz-Duban, N. (2013). Science and technology teachers’ views of primary school science and technology curriculum. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 64-74.
Zaidatol, Akmaliah Lope Pihie & Habibah Elias. (2000). Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Perdagangan, Keusahawanan dan ekonomi asas, Serdang: UPM.
Zaliza & Safarin (2014). Unemployment Among Malaysia Graduates: Graduates’ attributes, Lecturers’ Competency And Quality Of Education. International Conference on Education & Educational Psychology 2013 (ICEEPSY 2013), Social and Behavioral Sciences 112 ( 2014 ) 1056 – 1063
Zulzana Zulkarnain, Mohamed Saim dan Roslina Abd. Talib. (2012). Hubungan Antara Minat, Sikap Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Kursus CC301 – Quantity Measurement”, Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan 2012 (EduSem'12) Politeknik Port Dickson. |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |