UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Nagalaxmy Markandan
Title :The implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu district (IR)
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2017
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
This study aimed to analyze the implementation of reformed primary science curriculum in Jempol and Jelebu District, and to determine the relationship between the implementation of level I science curriculum and the teachers’ understanding. A mixed method approach was used. Quantitative data were collected through questionnaire from 127 science teachers, meanwhile the qualitative data collected through interviews, classroom observations and document analysis. The quantitative data were analyzed through SPSS, while the interview data were analyzed using ATLAS.ti. The findings show there is a significant positive relationship between the teachers’ understanding and the translation of science curriculum into the lesson plan. A significant positive relationship is also found between the teachers’ understanding and the strategies used in teaching science. There is also a positive relationship between the teachers’ understanding and the assessment methods carried out in the classroom. Nevertheless, insufficient of time in completing the learning standard and insufficient apparatus have become issues and challenges due to less understanding of the content of level I science curriculum. In conclusion, there is a positive relationship between all studied aspects of teachers’ understanding towards the reformed primary science curriculum and its implementation. In implication, the study indicates that there is a need in professional development trainings for teachers who are teaching level I science in order to maximize curriculum implementation at the classroom level.

References

Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2007). Pengajian kurikulum. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi 

Malaysia.

 

Abdul Rahman, A. (1987). Curriculum innovation in Malaysia: The case of KBSR. 

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of London Institute of Education.

 

Abdul Rahman, S. B. (2007). The implementation of the Contemporary Children's 

Literature program in Malaysian primary schools. Unpublished doctoral 

dissertation, University of Reading.

 

Airini, C., McNaughton, S., Langley, J., & Sauni, P. (2007). What educational reform 

means: Lessons from teachers, research and policy working together for student 

success. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6(1), 31–54.

 

Akerson,V., Buck,G., Donnelly,L. Nargundi-Joshi, V. & Weiland, I. (2011). The 

importance of teaching and learning nature of science in the early childhood years. 

Journal of Educational Technology, 20, 537-549.

 

Allan, A.G., Boschee, F., Whitehead, B.M., & Boschee, B.F. (2016). In Curriculum 

Leadership: Strategies for Development and implementation (4th ed.). Washington 

DC. Sage.

 

Al-Mekhlafi, A., & Nagaratnam, R. P. (2012). From firm ground to shifting sands: Issues 

in adopting learner-centred ESL/EFL pedagogy. The English Teacher, 41(1), 71–89.

 

Altrichter, H. (2005). Curriculum implementation – limiting and facilitating factors. In P. 

Nentwig & D. Waddington. (Eds.), Context based learning of science Munster: 

Waxmann. pp. 35–62.

 

Aloka, P. J. O. (2012). Group polarization in decision-making: A study of selected 

secondary school disciplinary panels in Rongo district of Kenya. (Doctoral thesis) 

University of the Western Cape, Cape Town, South Africa.

 

Aman, I., & Mustaffa, R. (2006). Classroom discourse of Malay language lesson: A critical 

analysis. Jurnal e-Bangi, 1(1), 1–24.

 

Amir Salleh (1993). Inservice training needs assessment for Malaysian secondary school 

teachers. Unpublished Phd Thesis, The University of Michigan.

 

Anderson, C. (2001). Designing systems to support learning science with understanding 

for all: Developing dialogues among researchers, reformers, and developers (No. 

available at http://www.project2061.org/events/meetings/textbook/science

/anderson.htm). Washington, DC: Project 2061.

 

Ashley, L. D. (2012). Case study research in J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe & L. V. Hedges 

(Eds.), Research methods and methodologies in education London: Sage. pp.102–107.

 

ASLI-CPPS, PROHAM & KITA-UKM. (2012). Report on education reform and process 

of consultation. Retrieved January 19, 2013 from 

http://www.cpps.org.my/upload/EDUCATION%20REFORM%20IN%20MAL 

AYSIA%20REPORT%202012.pdf

 

Bantwini, B. D. (2010). How teachers perceive the new curriculum reform: Lessons from 

a school district in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. International Journal of 

Educational Development, 30, 83-90 

 

Best, J., W., & Kahn, J., V. (2008). Research in education: Tenth Edition. New Delhi: 

Prentice-Hall.

 

Black,P., & William, D. (2009). Developing the theory of Formative Assessment 

Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability. 

 

Bloom, B. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment (UCLA-CSIEP), 1(2), 

1-12.

 

Bloom, B. S. (1971). Mastery learning. In J. H. Block (Ed.), Mastery learning: Theory 

and practice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston

 

Bloom, B. S., Hastings, J. T., & Madaus, G. (1971). Handbook on formative and 

summative evaluation of student learning. New York: McGraw-Hill.

 

Brain,K.,Reid,I.,&Boyes,L.C.(2006).Teachers as mediators between educational policy 

and practice. Educational Studies, 32(4), 411–423.

 

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Belkapp Press.

 

Carless, R. D. (1998). A case study of curriculum implementation in Hong Kong. System, 

26, 353–368.

 

Carless, R. D. (2004). Issues in teachers’ reinterpretation of a task-based innovation in 

primary schools. TESOL Quarterly, 38(4), 639–662.

 

Caswell, H. L., & Campbell, D.S. (1935). Curriculum development. New York: American 

Book Company.

 

Cheserek, G. J., & Mugalavai, V. K. (2012). Challenges and reforms facing Kenyan

education system in the 21st century: Integrating the principles of Vision 2030 and 

Constitution 2010. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational, 406.

 

Chisholm, L., & Leyendecker, R. (2008). Curriculum reform in post-1990s sub-Saharan 

Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 28, 195–205.

 

Chua, Y.P. (2012). Asas Statistik dan Penyelidikan (2nd ed.). Mc Graw Hill Education, 

Malaysia.

 

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). 

London: Routledge.

 

Corbin.J and Strauss, (1990a). Grounded Theory Tesearch: Procedures, canons, and 

evaluative criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21.

 

Crawford, B. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of 

practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613-642.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating 

quantitative and qualitative research (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.

 

Crump, S., & Ryan, C. (2001). Managing educational change: Issues, actions and 

examples. Change: Transformations in Education, 4(2), 1–14.

 

Curdt-Christiansen, X. L., & Silver, R. E. (2012). Educational reforms, cultural clashes and 

classroom practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 42(2), 141–161.

DeVries, R., Zan, B., Hildebrandt, C., Edmiaston, R., & Sales, C. (2002). Developing 

constructivist early childhood curriculum: Practical, principle, and activities. New 

York: Teachers College Press.

 

Dewey J. (1938). Experience and Education. Kappa Delta Pi.

 

Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and 

mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

 

Ebert, E.S., II, Ebert, C., Bentley, M. L. (2013, July 19). The educator’s field guide. 

Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

 

Economic and Social Research Council. ‘What influences participation in science and 

mathematics?’ A briefing paper from the Targeted Initiative on Science and 

Mathematics Education (TISME). London: ESRC/TISME; 2013. tismescienceandmaths.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/TISME-ParticipationReport.pdf

 

Edelson, D., & Reiser, B. (2006). Making authentic practices accessible to learners: Design 

challenges and strategies. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge Handbook of the 

Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press. (pp. 335-354)

 

Esah Sulaiman. (2004). Pengenalan pedagogi. Johor: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York: Teachers 

College Press.

 

Fullan, M . & Pomfret, A. (1975). Review of research on curriculum implementation. 

Unpublished manuscript, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto.

 

Fullan, M . & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on Curriculum and Instruction 

Implementation. 

 

Gotwals, A., & Songer, N. B. (2006). Measuring students' scientific content and inquiry 

reasoning. In S. Barab, K. Hay & D. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the International 

Conference of the Learning Sciences, 1, 196-202. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 

Associates.

 

Hanna, G. S., & Dettmer, P. A. (2004). Assessment for effective teaching: Using contextadaptive planning. Boston, MA.

 

Hasimah.Y., (2001). Primary science in Malaysia: The implementation of a new 

curriculum. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Warwick.

 

Hay, J. F. Smith & Paulsen, M. (2001). Teacher preparedness in inclusive education. South 

African Journal of Higher Education, 21(4), 213- 218.

 

Holton, E. H., & Burnett, M. B. (1997). Qualitative research methods. In R. A. Swanson, 

& E. F, Holton (Eds.), Human resource development research handbook: Linking 

research and practice. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

 

Indiana Department of education. (2010). Definition of terms. Indiana Accountability 

System for Academic Progress. Retrieved from 

http://www.doe.in.gov/asap/definitions.html. 

 

Ishtiaq Hussein and Qaiser Sulaiman. (2016), Effect of Bloom Mastery Learning Approach 

on Students’ Academic Achievement in English at secondary Level. Journal of 

Literature Language and Linguistics, 23, 2422-8435.

 

Jan Hardman and Norhaslynda (2014) Teachers and the implementation of new English 

Curriculum in Malaysia, Language, Culture and Curriculum, 27(3), 260- 277

 

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, 

California: SAGE Publications.

 

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A.J. (2004). Mixed methods research. A research 

paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

 

Kamsiah. O., Lilia. H. & Subahan. M., (2006). What Malaysian science teacher need to 

improve their Science Instruction: A comparison across Gender, School Location 

and area of Specialization. Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology 

Education, 2(2), 59-81.

 

Karen, C., and Jeannette. G., (2014, March 23). Problems being resolved. Plague with 

difficulties from the time of its implementation three years ago, the recent review of 

PBS has brought some cheer to the parties concerned. Retrieved from 

http://www.thestar.com.my/news/education/2014/03/23/being-resolved/. 

 

Kevin W. Curry Jr., Elizabeth Wilson, Jim L. Flowers & Charlotte E. Farin., (2012). 

Scientific Basis vs. Contextualized Teaching and Learning: The Effect on the 

Achievement of Postsecondary Students. Journal of Agricultural Education, 53(1), 

57–66.

 

Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy 

of Management Review, 21(4), 10055-1080.

 

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W., (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research 

Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement.

 

Lee, M.N.N. (1992). School science curriculum reforms in Malaysia: world influences and 

National Context. International Journal of Science Education.

 

Leedy, P. & Ormrod, J. (2001). Practical research: Planning and design (7th ed.). Upper 

Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications

 

Lumpe., A., Czerniak, C., Haney, J. & Beltyukova,.S. (2012). Belief about teaching 

science: The relationship between elementary teachers’ participation in Professional 

development and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 

34(2), 153-166.

 

Makunja, G. (2016). Challenges Facing Teachers in Implementing Competence-Based 

Curriculum in Tanzania: The Case of Community Secondary Schools in Morogoro 

Municipality. International Journal of Education and Social Science, 3(5), 30-37

 

Marshall, C. & Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th ed.). Thousand 

Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Marsh, J. C., & Willis, G. (2nd ed.). (1998). Curriculum: Alternative approaches, ongoing 

issues. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

 

Martin, P. W. (1999). Close encounters of a bilingual kind: Interactional practices in the 

primary classroom in Brunei. International Journal of Educational Development, 19, 

127–140.

 

McMillan, J. H. (2004). Educational research: Fundamentals for the consumer (4th ed.). 

Boston, USA: Pearson.

 

McTighe, J., & Wiggins, G. (2012). Understanding by design framework. Alexandria: 

Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved July 27, 2013 

from www.ascd.org

 

Mears, C. L. (2012). In-depth interviews. In J. Arthur, M. Waring, R. Coe & L. V. Hedges 

(Eds.), Research methods & methodologies in education (pp. 170–176). London: 

Sage.

 

Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education: 

revised and expanded from case study research in education. San Francisco, CA: 

Wiley.

 

Miles, M. & Louis, K. (1990). Mustering the will and skill for change. Educational 

Leadership. 47(8).

 

Millar, R. (1987). Teaching physics as a non-specialist. Department of Education, 

University of York.

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012a). Ministry of Education policies: Frequently asked 

questions. Retrieved February 29, 2016 from 

http://www.scribd.com/doc/105793167/Dasar-Dasar-KPM -NCM

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012b). Quick facts 2012: Malaysia educational 

statistics. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

 

Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2012c). Preliminary report: Malaysia education 

blueprint 2013–2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

 

Minner. D. & Jacqueline. D., (2012) Inquiry into Science Instruction Observation Protocol 

(ISIOP). Data Collection instrument. National Science Foundation.

 

Mohamad Idris Abdul Hamid., (2002). Kajian keperluan guru-guru sains Sekolah Rendah 

dalam aspek Pengajaran Sains. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Fakulti 

Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya.

 

Montgomery, B., & Way, W. L. (1995, December 1st). Lost and found voices in the process

of curriculum change. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American 

Vocational Association Convention, Denver, Colorado, USA. (ERIC Document 

Reproduction Service No. ED397269).

 

Mustaffa, R., Aman, I., Teo, K. S., & Mohd Noor, N. (2011). Pedagogical practices of 

English language lessons in Malaysian primary schools: A discourse analysis. 

Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(3), 626–639.

 

Mustapha, G. (2008). A reflection of the revised syllabus translated in textbooks. Journal 

of International Management Studies, 3(1), 162–169.

 

National Research Council (NRC). (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and 

teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

 

National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education 

Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press

 

Norhaslynda., Rahman. (2014). From Curriculum reform to Classroom Practice: An 

evaluation of English Primary Curriculum in Malaysia. A thesis presented in 

fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy in Education at 

University of York. 

 

O’Donnell, K. (2005). Japanese secondary English teachers: Negotiation of educational 

roles in the face of curricular reform. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 18(3), 

300–315. 

 

Ofsted, (2013). Maintaining Curiosity: A survey into science education in schools. 

Manchester: Ofsted; 2013; 7. ofsted.gov.uk/resources/maintaining-curiosity-surveyscience-education-schools

 

Orafi, S.M.S.,& Borg,S. (2009).Intentions and realites in implementing communicative 

curriculum reform. System, 37, 243–253.

 

Pandian, A. (2002). English language teaching in Malaysia today. Asia Pacific Journal of 

Education, 22(2), 35–52.

 

Penuel, W. R., Fishman, B. J., Yamaguchi, R., & Gallagher, L. P. (2007). What makes 

professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum 

implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 44(4), 921–958. 

 

Piaget, J. (1957). Construction of reality in the child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

 

Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. AMC, 10, 12.

 

Pinker, S. (2007). The stuff of thought. New York, NY: Viking: The Penguin Group.

 

Ryan, J., Kang, C.Y., Mitchell, I., & Erickson, G. (2009). Cross cultural research 

collaboration in the context of China’s basic education reform. Asia Pacific Journal 

of Education, 29(4), 427–441.

 

Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum approaches in language teaching: forward, central and 

backward design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33.

 

Sandelowski M.(1994) Focus on qualitative methods: Notes on transcription. Res Nurs 

Health 1994;17:3 

 

Schweisfurth, M. (2011). Learner-centred education in developing country contexts: From 

solution to problem. International Journal of Educational Development, 31, 425–

432.

 

Shihiba, S. E. S. (2011). An investigation of Libyan EFL teachers’ conceptions of the 

communicative learner-centred approach in relation to their implementation of an 

English language curriculum innovation in secondary schools (Unpublished doctoral 

dissertation). University of Durham, Durham, UK.

 

Shumba, A., Mpofu, E., Seotlew. M., & Montsi, M.R. (2011). Perceived Challenges of 

Implementing the Guidance Subject in Botswana Primary Schools. Journal of 

Science, 28(1), 1-11.

 

Sidhu, G. K., Fook, C. Y., & Kaur, S. (2010). Instructional practices in teaching literature: 

Observations of ESL classrooms in Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 3(2), 54–63.

 

Smit, B. (2005). Teachers, local knowledge, and policy implementation: A qualitative 

policy-practice inquiry. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 292–306.

 

Subahan M. M, Lilia, H., Khalijah, M.S. & Ruhizan, M. Y, (2001). IRPA Report: Nonoption physics teachers: preparation for better teaching.

 

Swart, E. & Pettipher, R. (2007). Understanding and Working with Change (eds), 

Responding to the challenge of Inclusive Education in Southern Africa. Pretoria: pp

121-139

 

Syed Kamaruzaman .,(2003). Teachers’ Planning and preparation for the lesson plan in the 

implementation of Form 4 Physical Education Curriculum for the physical fitness 

strand. Journal of Education Science, 1(4), 38-47

 

Talmy, S. (2010). Qualitative interviews in applied linguistics: From research instrument 

to social practice. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 128148.

 

Teresa, W., (2007). Re-Gendering Data: Quantifying Qualitative: Paper presented at 

association for institutional Research. Atlanta. 

 

Tweed, (2009), Designing Effective Science Instruction: What works in Science 

classroom? National Teacher Association press. p.38

 

Tyler, R.W. (1957). The Curriculum then and now. In proceedings of the 1956 Invitational 

conference on testing Problem. Princeton. NJ : Educational Testing Service. 

 

Wang, H. (2006). An implementation study of the English as a foreign language curriculum 

policies in the Chinese tertiary context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Queen’s 

University, Belfast.

 

Wolfinger, N.. H. (2002). On writing fieldnotes: Collection strategies and background 

expectancies. Qualitative Research, 2(1), 85-95.

 

ASLI-CPPS, PROHAM & KITA-UKM. (2012). Report on education reform and process 

of consultation. Retrieved January 19, 2013 from 

http://www.cpps.org.my/upload/EDUCATION%20REFORM%20IN%20MALAYSIA%20REPORT%202012.pdf

 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological 

processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

 

Wadsworth, B. J. (2004). Piaget's theory of cognitive and affective development: 

Foundations of constructivism. Longman Publishing.

 

Wang, H., & Cheng, L. (2008). The impact of curriculum innovation on the cultures of 

teaching. The Chinese English Foreign Language Journal, 1(1), 5–30.

 

Wiersma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (2009). Research methods in education: An introduction (9th 

ed.). Boston, USA: Pearson.

 

Winter, E.C. (2006). Preparing new teachers for inclusive schools and classrooms. Support 

for learning, 21(2), 85-91.

 

Ye, L. (2004). Let the classroom teaching be more vital. Teachers’ Friend, 1, 49–53.

 

Ysseldyke, J., Spicuzza, R., Kosciolek, S., & Boys, C. (2003). Effects of learning 

information system on Mathematic achievement and classroom structure. Journal of 

Educational Science,1(4), 38-47.

 

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed). Thousand Oaks, 

CA: Sage.

 

Yildiz-Duban, N. (2013). Science and technology teachers’ views of primary school 

science and technology curriculum. International Journal of Education in 

Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1(1), 64-74.

 

Zaidatol, Akmaliah Lope Pihie & Habibah Elias. (2000). Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran 

Perdagangan, Keusahawanan dan ekonomi asas, Serdang: UPM.

 

Zaliza & Safarin (2014). Unemployment Among Malaysia Graduates: Graduates’

attributes, Lecturers’ Competency And Quality Of Education. International 

Conference on Education & Educational Psychology 2013 (ICEEPSY 2013), Social 

and Behavioral Sciences 112 ( 2014 ) 1056 – 1063

 

Zulzana Zulkarnain, Mohamed Saim dan Roslina Abd. Talib. (2012). Hubungan Antara 

Minat, Sikap Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Kursus CC301 – Quantity 

Measurement”, Prosiding Seminar Pendidikan 2012 (EduSem'12) Politeknik Port 

Dickson.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)