UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :article
Subject :L Education
Main Author :Vicneas Muniady
Additional Authors :Ahmad Zamzuri Mohamad Ali
Title :Virtual agent
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :2019
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Virtual agents are animated, life-like characters used in virtual learning environment to facilitate learning tasks. Since social relationship between the virtual agent and learner is important, the design of virtual agent appearance should be emphasised. The realism level of virtual agent may cause distress to the users, especially when the character mimics human; which is based on the uncanny valley phenomenon highlighted by Mori in 1970. Therefore, the virtual agent effectiveness in terms of promoting positive emotion is influenced by the character’s realism. Moreover, learners’ acceptance of the virtual agent depends on their emotion towards it, which is recognised through their stimulus. Hence, emotional valence and arousal is expected to affect students’ emotion in learning. Therefore, this paper proposes a conceptual framework to be the guidelines in the development of animated virtual agents to maximise students’ positive emotions in learning. The Mayer’s Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning, Mori’s Uncanny Valley phenomenon and Russell’s Circumplex Model of Affect are the basis in constructing the conceptual framework in this study.

References

1. Ahmad Zamzuri, M. A., & Mohd Najib, H. (2016). The Effects of Talking-Head with Various Realism Levels on Students’ Emotions in Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633116672057

2. Balasubramanyam, V. (2012). Animations in medical education : You can do it ! Response,

= 5(1), 18–22. http://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.97502

3. Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: controversies and emerging consensus. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 8, 10–14. doi: 10.1111/1467- 8721.00003

4. Baylor, A. L. (2002). Agent-Based Learning Environments As a Research Tool for Investigating Teaching and Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 227–248. http://doi.org/10.2190/PH2K-6P09-K8EC-KRDK

5. Baylor A.L., Kim Y. (2004) Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity, and Instructional Role. In: Lester J.C., Vicari R.M., Paraguaçu F. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3220, 592-603. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_56

6. Baylor, A. L., Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., & Plant, E. A. (2006). Interface Agents as Social Models : The Impact of Appearance on Females ’ Attitude Toward Engineering. {CHI} ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125564

7. Bian, Y., & Yang, C. (2016). Effects s of Pedagogical Agent’s Personality and Emotional Feedback Strategy on Chinese Students ’ Learning Experiences and a Performance : A Study Based on Virtual Tai Chi Training Studio. Chi ’16.

8. Chen, G. D., Lee, J. H., Wang, C. Y., Chao, P. Y., Li, L. Y., & Lee, T. Y. (2012). An empathic avatar in a computer-aided learning program to encourage and persuade learners. Educational Technology and Society, 15(2), 62–72.

9. Eisenberg, N., Sadovsky, A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2005). Associations of emotion-related regulation with language skills, emotion knowledge, and academic outcomes. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2005(109), 109-118.

10. Gholami, V., & Moghaddam, M. M. (2013). The effect of weekly quizzes on students' final achievement score. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(1), 36. Retrieved from http://www.mecs-press.org/ijmecs/ijmecs-v5-n1/IJMECS-V5-N1-5.pdf

11. Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2010). Challenging gender stereotypes using virtual pedagogical characters. In S. Goodman, S. Booth, & G. Kirkup (Eds.), Gender issues in learning and working with Information Technology: Social constructs and cultural contexts. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.

12. Hong, Z.-W., Chen, Y.-L., & Lan, C.-H. (2014). A courseware to script animated pedagogical agents in instructional material for elementary students in English education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 379–394. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.733712

13. Johnson, B. C., & Kiviniemi, M. T. (2009). The Effect of Online Chapter Quizzes on Exam Performance in an Undergraduate Social Psychology Course, 36(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802528972.

14. Katerina, T. (2011). Learning Spanish with Laura : the effects of a pedagogical agent. Educational Media International, 48(4), 335–351. http://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2011.632280

15. Kensinger, E. A., and Corkin, S. (2004). Two routes to emotionalmemory: distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 101, 3310–3115. http://doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306408101

16. Kogilathah, S., Ahmad Zamzuri, M. A., & Wee Hoe, T. (2013). Talking Head Animation as Pedagogical Agent in Language Learning : A Review on Instructional Strategy and Media. Malaysian Journal O Distance Education, 15(1), 55–71. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2db2/eb1c507bd64c5d4b3c46868f97be34768504.pdf

17. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., & Bhogal, R. S. (1997, March). The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 359-366). ACM.

18. Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

19. Mohd Najib,H. (2015).Tahap realistik karakter animasi talking-head dan kesannya terhadap emosi dan prestasi pembelajaran.(Unpublished Doctoral dissertation.) Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia.

20. Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley. In K. F. MacDorman, & N. Kageki (Trans.), IEEE robotics and automation, 19(2), 98–100 (Original work published in 1970). http://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811

21. Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2008). Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students’ attitudes and beliefs. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(6), 2741–2756. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.017

22. Rubin, D. C., & Talarico, J. M. (2009). A comparison of dimensional models of emotion: evidence from emotions, prototypical events, autobiographical memories, and words. Memory (Hove, England), 17(8), 802–8. http://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903130764

23. Russel, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-78.

24. Shiban, Y., Schelhorn, I., Jobst, V., Hornlein, A., Puppe, F., Pauli, P., & Muhlberger, A. (2015). The appearance effect: Influences of virtual agent features on performance and motivation. Computers in Human Behaviour, 49, 5–11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.077

25. Tinwell, A. (2016). Is the Uncanny Valley a Universal or Individual Response ?, (January 2015). http://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.2.03tin

26. Veletsianos. (2010). Contextual Relevant Pedagogical Agents: Visual Appearance, Stereotypes, and first imporession and thier impact on learning. Computers & Education.

27. Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behaviour and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 121-135.


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.