1. Ahmad Zamzuri, M. A., & Mohd Najib, H. (2016). The Effects of Talking-Head with Various Realism Levels on Students’ Emotions in Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0735633116672057
2. Balasubramanyam, V. (2012). Animations in medical education : You can do it ! Response,
= 5(1), 18–22. http://doi.org/10.4103/0975-2870.97502
3. Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: controversies and emerging consensus. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 8, 10–14. doi: 10.1111/1467- 8721.00003
4. Baylor, A. L. (2002). Agent-Based Learning Environments As a Research Tool for Investigating Teaching and Learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 26(3), 227–248. http://doi.org/10.2190/PH2K-6P09-K8EC-KRDK
5. Baylor A.L., Kim Y. (2004) Pedagogical Agent Design: The Impact of Agent Realism, Gender, Ethnicity, and Instructional Role. In: Lester J.C., Vicari R.M., Paraguaçu F. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2004. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3220, 592-603. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_56
6. Baylor, A. L., Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., & Plant, E. A. (2006). Interface Agents as Social Models : The Impact of Appearance on Females ’ Attitude Toward Engineering. {CHI} ’06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 526–531. https://doi.org/10.1145/1125451.1125564
7. Bian, Y., & Yang, C. (2016). Effects s of Pedagogical Agent’s Personality and Emotional Feedback Strategy on Chinese Students ’ Learning Experiences and a Performance : A Study Based on Virtual Tai Chi Training Studio. Chi ’16.
8. Chen, G. D., Lee, J. H., Wang, C. Y., Chao, P. Y., Li, L. Y., & Lee, T. Y. (2012). An empathic avatar in a computer-aided learning program to encourage and persuade learners. Educational Technology and Society, 15(2), 62–72.
9. Eisenberg, N., Sadovsky, A., & Spinrad, T. L. (2005). Associations of emotion-related regulation with language skills, emotion knowledge, and academic outcomes. New directions for child and adolescent development, 2005(109), 109-118.
10. Gholami, V., & Moghaddam, M. M. (2013). The effect of weekly quizzes on students' final achievement score. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(1), 36. Retrieved from http://www.mecs-press.org/ijmecs/ijmecs-v5-n1/IJMECS-V5-N1-5.pdf
11. Gulz, A., & Haake, M. (2010). Challenging gender stereotypes using virtual pedagogical characters. In S. Goodman, S. Booth, & G. Kirkup (Eds.), Gender issues in learning and working with Information Technology: Social constructs and cultural contexts. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
12. Hong, Z.-W., Chen, Y.-L., & Lan, C.-H. (2014). A courseware to script animated pedagogical agents in instructional material for elementary students in English education. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(5), 379–394. http://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.733712
13. Johnson, B. C., & Kiviniemi, M. T. (2009). The Effect of Online Chapter Quizzes on Exam Performance in an Undergraduate Social Psychology Course, 36(1), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00986280802528972.
14. Katerina, T. (2011). Learning Spanish with Laura : the effects of a pedagogical agent. Educational Media International, 48(4), 335–351. http://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2011.632280
15. Kensinger, E. A., and Corkin, S. (2004). Two routes to emotionalmemory: distinct neural processes for valence and arousal. Proc.Natl. Acad.Sci.U.S.A. 101, 3310–3115. http://doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306408101
16. Kogilathah, S., Ahmad Zamzuri, M. A., & Wee Hoe, T. (2013). Talking Head Animation as Pedagogical Agent in Language Learning : A Review on Instructional Strategy and Media. Malaysian Journal O Distance Education, 15(1), 55–71. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/2db2/eb1c507bd64c5d4b3c46868f97be34768504.pdf
17. Lester, J. C., Converse, S. A., Kahler, S. E., Barlow, S. T., Stone, B. A., & Bhogal, R. S. (1997, March). The persona effect: affective impact of animated pedagogical agents. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 359-366). ACM.
18. Mayer, R. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd Ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Mohd Najib,H. (2015).Tahap realistik karakter animasi talking-head dan kesannya terhadap emosi dan prestasi pembelajaran.(Unpublished Doctoral dissertation.) Sultan Idris Education University, Perak, Malaysia.
20. Mori, M. (2012). The uncanny valley. In K. F. MacDorman, & N. Kageki (Trans.), IEEE robotics and automation, 19(2), 98–100 (Original work published in 1970). http://doi.org/10.1109/MRA.2012.2192811
21. Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2008). Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students’ attitudes and beliefs. Computers in Human Behaviour, 24(6), 2741–2756. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.017
22. Rubin, D. C., & Talarico, J. M. (2009). A comparison of dimensional models of emotion: evidence from emotions, prototypical events, autobiographical memories, and words. Memory (Hove, England), 17(8), 802–8. http://doi.org/10.1080/09658210903130764
23. Russel, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. J. Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161-78.
24. Shiban, Y., Schelhorn, I., Jobst, V., Hornlein, A., Puppe, F., Pauli, P., & Muhlberger, A. (2015). The appearance effect: Influences of virtual agent features on performance and motivation. Computers in Human Behaviour, 49, 5–11. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.077
25. Tinwell, A. (2016). Is the Uncanny Valley a Universal or Individual Response ?, (January 2015). http://doi.org/10.1075/is.16.2.03tin
26. Veletsianos. (2010). Contextual Relevant Pedagogical Agents: Visual Appearance, Stereotypes, and first imporession and thier impact on learning. Computers & Education.
27. Winkielman, P., Berridge, K. C., & Wilbarger, J. L. (2005). Unconscious affective reactions to masked happy versus angry faces influence consumption behaviour and judgments of value. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 121-135.