Competency of School Principals in Managing Change in Malaysian Secondary Schools: Teachers Perspective

Tai, Mei Kin

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	H Social Sciences
Main Author :	Tai, Mei Kin
Additional Authors :	Omar Abdull Kareem Arsalan Mujahid Ghouri
Title :	Competency of School Principals in Managing Change in Malaysian Secondary Schools: Teachers Perspective

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :	2019
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The increasing demands for school reform continuously challenge the roles of school leaders as change agents in the process of school change. Today, school leadership is not task driven per se but emotionally compelling. The aim of the study was to identify the level of competency in managing change (CIMC) of school principals in Malaysian secondary schools. Analysis of the survey was performed based on the data of 901 teachers. The findings revealed that, i) school principals were rated as Quite Good in CIMC; ii) in terms of dimensions, school principals were reported Quite Good both in Technical and Non-technical Competency; iii) in terms of sub-dimensions of CIMC, the school principals were rated as Good in Goal Framing, Institutionalizing, Emotional Utilization and Emotional Regulation but Quite Good in Capacity Building, Defusing Resistance and Conflicts, Emotional Perceiving and Expressing as well as Emotional Understanding; and iv) among all the sub-dimensions of CIMC, the school principals obtained the highest mean score in Goal Framing and achieved the lowest mean score in Defusing Resistance and Conflicts. The study offers the Ministry of Education, local practitioners and relevant parties another dimension of enhancing and enlarging school principals’ capacity for change.

References

1. Balogun, J., & Hope-Hailey, V. (2004). Exploring strategic change (2nd ed.). London: Prentice Hall.

2. Beatty, B. (2000). The emotions of educational leadership: Breaking the silence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(4), 331–357. doi:10.1080/136031200750035969

3. Bennis, W., & Nanus, B. (1985). Leadership: The strategies for taking charge . New York, NY: Harper & Row.

4. Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and student achievement: What research says? Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

5. D eloitt e & Tou che. (1996). Exec ut iv e surv ey of manuf ac t urers. Ret rieved f rom http://www. dtcg.co/research

6. Dempster, N., Lovett, S., & Fluckiger, B. (2011). Strategies to developing school leadership: A select literature review. Melbourne: Australia Institute for Teaching and School Leadership.

7. Elliott, C. (1992). Leadership and change in schools. Issues in Educational Research, 2(1), 45-55.

8. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Structural Equation Models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(August), 382-388.

9. Fullan, M. (1993). Change forces probing the depths of education reform. London: The Falmer Press.

10. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

11. Fullan, M. (2010). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass

12. Goldring, E. B., Preston, C., & Huff, J. (2010). Conceptualizing and evaluating professional development for school leaders. Paper prepared for the Asian Leadership Roundtable, Institute of Education, 11-12 January, Hong Kong.

13. Hair, J. F. Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multiv ariat e data analysis (7th ed.). United States: Pearson.

14. Harris, A. (2004). Editorial - School leadership and school improvement: A simple and a complex relationship. School Leadership and Management, 24(1), 3-5.

15. Harris, A., Jones, M., & Huffman, , J. B. (2018). Teachers leading educational reform: The power of professional learning communities. London, UK: Routledge.

16. Hayes, J. (2010). The theory and practice of change management (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

17. H o e k s t r a , A . , B r e k e l m a n s , M . , B e i j a a r d , D . , & K o r t h a g e n , F . A . J . ( 2 0 0 9 ) . Experienced teachers’ informal learning: Learning activities and changes in behaviour and Cognition. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 363-373.

18. Huber, S. G. (2008). Leadership development and school development: Enhancing the leadership c a p a c i t y i n s c h o o l s . I n I n t e r n a t i o n a l H a n d b o o k o n t h e P r e p a r a t i o n an d D ev elopment o f Sc hool Leade rs, ed it ed b y J. Lu mb y, G. Crow an d P. Pashiardis, 163-175. New York: Routledge.

19. Hyland, P. K. (2007). Resistance to organizational change: The impact of followers’ disposition toward change and supervisors’ leadership style (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, Columbia.

20. I n s t i t u t A m i n u d d i n B a k i ( I A B ) . ( 2 0 1 5 ) . T r a i n i n g p r o g r a m 2 0 1 5 . G e n t i n g Highlands: Institut Aminuddin Baki.

21. I n s t i t u t A m i n u d d i n B a k i ( I A B ) . ( 2 0 1 6 ) . T r a i n i n g p r o g r a m 2 0 1 6 . G e n t i n g Highlands: Institut Aminuddin Baki.

22. I n s t i t u t A m i n u d d i n B a k i ( I A B ) . ( 2 0 1 7 ) . T r a i n i n g p r o g r a m 2 0 1 7 . G e n t i n g Highlands: Institut Aminuddin Baki.

23. Intagliata, J., Ulrich, D., & Smallwood, N. (2000). Levering leadership competencies to produce leadership brand: Creating distinctiveness by focusing on strategy and results, Human Resource Planning, 23(3), 101-125.

24. Issah, M. (2018). Change Leadership: The Role of Emotional Intelligence. SAGE Open, July-September, 1-6. doi: 10.1177/2158244018800910

25. Joyce, B., & Calhoun, E. (2010). Models of professional development: A celebration of educators. California: Thousand Oaks.

26. J u e c h t e r , W . M . , C a r o l i n e , F . , A l f o r d , R . J . ( 1 9 9 8 ) . F i v e c o n d i t i o n s f o r h i g h performance cultures. Training and Development, 52(5), 63-76.

27. Kerfoot, K. (1999). On leadership. Nursing Economics, 17(1), 34-42.

28. Kotter, J. P. (1990). A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York, NY: The Free Press.

29. Kotter, J.P. (1999). Leading change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

30. L e i t h w o o d , K . A . , S e a s h o r e , L . K . , A n d e r s o n , S . , & W a h l s t r o m , K . ( 2 0 0 4 ) . H o w leadership influences student learning: Learning from research project. US: University of Minnesota.

31. L e w i n , K . ( 1 9 5 8 ) . G r o u p d e c i s i o n s a n d s o c i a l c h a n g e . I n G . E . S w a n s o n , T . M . Newcomb & E.L. Hartley (Eds.), Readings in Social Psychology (pp. 62-73). New York, NY: Holt, Rhinehart & Winston.

32. Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., & McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From Research to results. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

33. Michaelidou, A., & Pashiardis, P. (2009). Professional development of school leaders in Cyprus: is it working? Professional Development in Education, 35(3), 399-416.

34. M i n i s t r y of E d u c at io n M a l a y s ia . (2 01 6) . An n u a l re p o rt of M a l a y s i a E d u c a t i on Blueprint 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

35. Ministry of Education Malaysia. (2017). Report of School Transformation Programme. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia.

36. Mitgang, L. (2012). The making of the principal: Five lessons in leadership training . New York, NY:The Wallace Foundation.

37. Mohamed, Z., Valcke, M., & De Wever, B. (2017). Are they ready to teach? Student teachers’ readiness for the job with reference to teacher competence frameworks. Journal of education for Teaching, 43(2), 151-170

38. Nicolaidou, M., & Petridou, A. (2011). Echoing school leaders' voices in Cyprus: a study of novice school leaders' perceptions regarding leadership professional development. P r o f e s s i o n a l D e v e l o p m e n t i n E d u c a t i o n , 3 7 ( 5 ) , 7 2 1 - 7 4 0 .

39. Nilakant, V., & Ramanarayan, S. (2006). Change management: Altering mindset in a global context. New Delhi: Response Books.

40. Northouse, P. G. (2015). Leadership: Theory and Practice, 7th eds. SAGE Publication: Los Angeles.

41. Olivier, D. F., & Huffman, J. B. (2016). Professional learning community process in the United States: Conceptualization of the process and district support for schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(2), 301-317. Ddoi: org/10.1080/02188791.2016.1148856

42. Omar, A. K., & Tai, M.K. (2018). The development of principal change leadership emotional intelligence model. International Journal of Managment in Education, 12(3), 276-313. doi: 10.1504/IJMIE.2018.092871

43. Opfer, V.D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407.

44. Oplatka, I. (2003). School change and self renewal: Some reflections from life stories of women principals. Journal of Education Change, 4(1), 25-43.

45. Pamer, J. J., & D e Waal, E. (2011) . Sc h ool ch an ge an d emot ion al in t elligen ce. Journal of Social Science, 26(3), 171-181.

46. Patti, J., Senge, P., Madrazo, C., & Stern, M. (2015). Growing school leaders who can grow learning cultures. In J.A. Durlak, C.E. Domitrovich, R.P. Weissberg & T.P. Gullotta (Eds.), Handbook of social and emotional learning: Research and Practice. New York, NY: Guilford Publications.

47. Petridou, A., Nocolaidou, M., & Karagiorgi, Y. (2017). Exploring the impact of p r o f e s s i o n a l d e v e l o p m e n t a n d p r o f e s s i o n a l p r a c t i c e o n s c h o o l l e a d e r s ' s e l f - efficacy: A quasi-experimental study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 28(1), 56-73.

48. Rosnarizah, A.H., Amin, S., & Abdul Razak, M. (2009). Innovation in educational management and leadership: High impact competency for Malaysian school leaders. Ret rieved f rom www.seameo.org/ vl/ lib rary/ d lwelcome/ project s/jasper/.../FullPaper.pdf

49. Rothwell, W.J., Hohne, C.K., & King, S.T. (2007). Human performance improvement: Building practitioner competence (2nd ed.). USA: Butterworth-Heinemann.

50. S p i l l a n e , J . P . , H a l v e r s o n , R . , & D i a m o n d , J . B . ( 2 0 0 1 ) . I n v e s t i g a t i n g S c h o o l Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28.

51. S y , T . , T r a m , S . , & O ’ H a r a A . L . ( 2 0 0 6 ) . R e l a t i o n o f e m p l o y e e a n d m a n a g e r e m o t i o n a l i n t e l l i g e n c e t o j o b s a t i s f a c t i o n a n d p e r f o r m a n c e . J o u r n a l o f Vocational Behaviour, 68, 461–473.

52. Tai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2013). Principals change leadership competencies: A study in Malaysian high performing secondary school. Journal of Education andPractice, 4 (27), 101-116.

53. ai, M . K., & Omar, A. K. (2018a ). A c omp arat ive an al ys i s of p rin cip al ch an ge leadership competencies in Malaysian high- and mediocre-performing secondary schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02188791.2018.1476319

54. Tai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2018b). Emotional intelligence of school principals in managing change: A comparison among high, mediocre and low-performing secondary schools in Malaysia. International Studies in Educational Administration, 46(3), 67-88.

55. ai, M. K., & Omar, A. K. (2018c). Headteacher change leadership competency: A study in Malaysian primary schools. Professional Development in Education. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/19415257.2018.1561494

56. Tai, M .K., Omar, A. K., & Gh ou ri, A.M . (2018). D ev elop in g a prel imi na ry mo de l onprofessional learning community in Malaysian secondary school Unpublished research report which was funded by Fundamental Research Grant Scheme [Code: 2017-0196-107-01], Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia). Sultan Idris Education University, Perak Darul Ridzuan, Malaysia.

57. Wong, C. S., & Law, S. K. (2002). Th e eff ect s of leader and follower emotional intelligence on performance and attitude: An exploratory study. Leadership Quarterly, 13, 243–274.

Y58. ukl, G.A. (2002). Leadership in organization (5t h ed .). Up per Sadd le River, N J: Prentice-Hall.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page